Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 36(3): 420-423, May-June 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1288239

RESUMO

Abstract In the growing era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, it is crucial to develop minimally invasive surgical techniques. These methods enable easier recovery from surgical trauma, especially in elderly and frail patients. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is frequently performed via upper hemisternotomy. We describe MIAVR via right anterior thoracotomy, which is associated with less trauma, rapid mobilization, lower blood transfusion rates, and lower risk of postoperative wound infections. As minimally invasive procedures tend to take longer operative times, we suggest using rapid-deployment valve prostheses to overcome this limitation. This description focuses on the technical aspects and preoperative assessment.


Assuntos
Humanos , Idoso , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Toracotomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 35(2): 141-144, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1101481

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To test the German Aortic Valve (GAV) score at our university hospital in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: A total of 224 patients who underwent isolated conventional AVR between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Patients with concomitant procedures and transcatheter aortic valve implantation were excluded. Patients' data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients' risk scores were calculated according to criteria described by GAV score. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUC]) were also calculated. The calibration of the model was tested by the Hosmer-Lemeshow method. Results: The mortality rate was 8.04% (18 patients). The patients' mean age was 58.2±19.3 years and 25% of them were female (56 patients). Mean GAV score was 1.73±5.86 (min: 0.0; max: 3.53). The GAV score showed excellent discriminative capacity (AUC 0.925, 95% confidence interval 0.882-0.956; P<0.001). The cutoff "1.8" turned out to be the best discriminatory point with the best combination of sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (75.7%) to predict operative death. Hosmer-Lemeshow method revealed a P-value of 0.687, confirming a good calibration of the model. Conclusion: The GAV score applies to our population with high predictive accuracy.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Valva Aórtica , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Brasil , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA