Option for the radial versus femoral access in coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: a risk-treatment paradox / Opção para o acesso radial versus femoral na intervenção coronária em síndromes coronárias agudas: um paradoxo de tratamento de risco

Background: In coronary procedures, although the radial approach protects patients from hemorrhagic complications, it is technically more complex than the femoral approach. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that the radial approach is the procedure of choice in ACS patients due to the high risk of bleeding; and to identify independent predictors of the choice for radial access. Methods: Patients admitted for ACS who underwent invasive coronary procedure were included. We registered the type of access (femoral or radial) chosen by the physician for the first angiography; the investigators did not interfere with this choosing process. Student's t-test was used for comparisons between the CRUSADE and ACUITY scores. Predictors of radial access were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was defined by p < 0,05.Results: Radial access was chosen in 67% of 347 consecutive patients. Patients who underwent radial approach had lower risk of bleeding determined by CRUSADE (30 ± 14 vs. 37 ± 15; p < 0.001) as compared with femoral access. In multivariate analysis, four variables were identified as independent predictors negatively associated with radial access ­ age (OR = 0.98; 95%CI = 0.96 ­ 0.99), creatinine (OR = 0.54; 95%CI = 0.3 ­ 0.98), signs of left ventricular failure (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22 ­ 0.92) and previous CABG (OR = 0.022; 95%CI = 0.003 ­ 0.166). Conclusion: The propensity to choose radial over femoral access in coronary intervention was not primarily influenced by patients' bleeding risk. Predictors of this decision, identified in the study, indicated less complex patients, suggesting that the difficulty in performing the technique was a stronger determinant than its potential antihemorrhagic effect

Acurácia dos escores GRACE e TIMI na predição da gravidade angiográfica da síndrome coronariana aguda / Accuracy of the GRACE and TIMI scores in predicting the angiographic severity of acute coronary syndrome

FUNDAMENTO: A acurácia dos escores GRACE e TIMI em predizer a extensão da doença coronariana em pacientes com síndromes coronarianas agudas sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (SCA) não está estabelecida. OBJETIVO: Testar a hipótese de que os escores de risco GRACE e TIMI predizem satisfatoriamente a extensão da doença coronariana, em pacientes com SCA submetidos a coronariografia. MÉTODOS: Indivíduos admitidos com critérios objetivos de SCA e que realizaram coronariografia durante o internamento foram consecutivamente analisados. A doença coronariana angiográfica foi descrita de três formas: quantificação da extensão da doença coronariana pelo escore de Gensini; presença de qualquer obstrução coronariana (> 70% ou > 50% quando tronco de coronária esquerda); presença de doença severa (triarterial ou tronco de coronária esquerda). RESULTADOS: Em 112 pacientes avaliados, observou-se correlação positiva do escore de Gensini com os escores GRACE (p = 0,017) e TIMI (p = 0,02), porém essa associação foi de fraca magnitude (r = 0,23 e r = 0,27; respectivamente). O escore GRACE não foi capaz de predizer doença coronariana obstrutiva (área abaixo da curva ROC = 0,57; 95%IC = 0,46 - 0,69), nem doença coronariana severa (ROC = 0,59; 95%IC = 0,48 -0,70). O Escore TIMI se mostrou modesto preditor em relação à presença de doença coronariana (ROC = 0,65; 95%IC = 0,55 - 0,76) e presença de doença severa (ROC = 0,66; 95%IC = 0,56 - 0,76). CONCLUSÃO: (1) Existe associação positiva entre o valor dos escores TIMI ou GRACE e a extensão da doença coronária em pacientes com SCA; (2) No entanto, o grau dessa associação não é suficiente para que esses escores sejam preditores acurados dos resultados da coronariografia.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of the GRACE and TIMI scores in predicting coronary disease extension in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To assess the hypothesis that the GRACE and TIMI risk scores satisfactorily predict coronary disease extension in patients withnon-ST-elevation ACS undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: Individuals meeting the objective criteria for ACS and undergoing coronary angiography during hospitalization were consecutively assessed. Angiographic coronary disease was described as follows: quantification of coronary disease extension by using Gensini score; presence of any coronary artery obstruction (> 70% or > 50% when affecting left main coronary artery); and presence of severe disease (three-vessel disease or affecting the left main coronary artery). RESULTS: Of 112 patients assessed, a positive correlation of the Gensini score was observed with the GRACE (p = 0.017) and TIMI (p = 0.02) scores, but that association was weak (r = 0.23 and r = 0.27; respectively). The GRACE score could predict neither obstructive coronary disease (area under the ROC curve = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.46 - 0.69), nor severe coronary disease (ROC = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.48 - 0.70). The TIMI score proved to be a modest predictor of coronary disease (ROC = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.76) and of severe coronary disease (ROC = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.56 - 0.76). CONCLUSION: (1) There is a positive association between the values of the TIMI or GRACE scores and the extension of coronary artery disease in patients with ACS; (2) however, the degree of that association is not sufficient to make those scores accurate predictors of coronary angiography results.

Análise de causalidade da relação entre sangramento e letalidade de Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas / Causality analysis of the relationship between bleeding and lethality in Acute Coronary Syndromes

FUNDAMENTO: Eventos hemorrágicos em Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas (SCA) apresentam associação independente com óbito em registros multicêntricos internacionais. No entanto, essa associação não foi testada em nosso meio e a verdadeira relação causal entre sangramento e óbito não está plenamente demonstrada. OBJETIVO: Testar as hipóteses de que: (1) sangramento maior é preditor independente de óbito hospitalar em SCA; (2) a relação entre esses dois desfechos é causal. MÉTODOS: Incluídos pacientes com critérios pré-definidos de angina instável, infarto sem supradesnivelamento do ST ou infarto com supradesnivelamento do ST. Sangramento maior durante o internamento foi definido de acordo com os tipos 3 ou 5 da Classificação Universal de Sangramento. Regressão logística e análise da sequência de eventos foram utilizadas para avaliar a associação entre sangramento e óbito. RESULTADOS: Dentre 455 pacientes estudados, 29 desenvolveram sangramento maior (6,4%; 95%IC = 4,3-9,0%). Esses indivíduos apresentaram mortalidade hospitalar de 21%, comparados a 5,6% nos pacientes sem sangramento (RR = 4,0; 95%IC = 1,8-9,1; P = 0,001). Após ajuste para escore de propensão, sangramento maior permaneceu preditor de óbito hospitalar (OR = 3,34; 95%IC = 1,2-9,5; P = 0,02). Houve 6 óbitos dentre 29 pacientes que sangraram. No entanto, análise detalhada da sequência de eventos demonstrou relação causal em apenas um caso. CONCLUSÃO: (1) Sangramento maior é preditor independente de óbito hospitalar em SCA; (2) O papel do sangramento como marcador de risco predomina sobre seu papel de fator de risco para óbito. Essa conclusão deve ser vista como geradora de hipótese a ser confirmada por estudos de maior tamanho amostral. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic events in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) have been independently associated with death in international multicenter registries. However, that association has not been tested in Brazil and the true causal relationship between bleeding and death has not been completely shown. OBJECTIVE: To test the following hypotheses: (1) major bleeding is an independent predictor of in-hospital death in ACS; (2) the relationship between those two endpoints is causal. METHODS: This study included patients meeting predefined criteria of unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Major bleeding during hospitalization was defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (types 3 or 5). Logistic regression and analysis of the sequence of events were used to assess the association between bleeding and death. RESULTS: Of the 455 patients studied, 29 experienced major bleeding (6.4%; 95% CI = 4.3-9.0%). They had in-hospital mortality of 21%, as compared with 5.6% of those not experiencing bleeding (RR = 4.0; 95% CI = 1.8-9.1; P = 0.001). After adjusting for the propensity score, major bleeding remained as a predictor of in-hospital death (OR = 3.34; 95% CI = 1.2-9.5; P = 0.02). Of the 29 patients who experienced bleeding, six died. However, the detailed analysis of the sequence of events showed causal relationship only in one case. CONCLUSION: (1) Major bleeding is an independent predictor of in-hospital death in ACS; (2) the role of bleeding as a risk marker overcomes that as a risk factor for death. This conclusion should be seen as a hypothesis generator to be confirmed by larger-sample studies. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).