Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
J. vasc. bras ; 21: e20210087, 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1394426

RESUMO

Abstract Background From 1990 to 2015, mortality from aortic aneurysms increased 16.8% in Brazil. São Paulo is the largest city in Brazil and about 5 million people depend on the public health system there. Objectives To conduct an epidemiological analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries in the city of São Paulo. Methods Infra-renal aortic aneurysm procedures performed over a decade (from 2008 to 2017) were studied using publicly-available platforms from the Unified Health System and DATASUS. Results 2693 procedures were analyzed; 66.73% were endovascular; 78.7% of patients were male; 70.7% were aged 65 years or more; 64.02% were elective hospital admissions. There were 288 in-hospital deaths (mortality: 10.69%). In-hospital mortality was lower for endovascular surgery than for open surgery; both for elective (4.13% versus 14.42%) and urgent (9.73% versus 27.94%) (p = 0.019) admissions. The highest volume hospital (n = 635) had the lowest in-hospital mortality (3.31%). USD 24,835,604.84 was paid; an average of $ 2,318.63 for elective open, $ 3,420.10 for emergency open, $ 12,157.35 for elective endovascular and $ 12,969.12 for urgent endovascular procedures. Endovascular procedure costs were statistically higher than the values paid for open surgeries (p <0.001). Conclusions Endovascular surgeries were performed twice as often as open surgeries; they had shorter hospital stays and lower mortality.


Resumo Contexto No Brasil, a mortalidade por aneurisma de aorta aumentou 16,8% de 1990 a 2015. São Paulo é a maior cidade do Brasil, e cerca de 5 milhões de pessoas dependem do sistema público de saúde. Objetivos Análise epidemiológica das cirurgias do aneurisma de aorta abdominal na cidade de São Paulo. Métodos As cirurgias para correção do aneurisma de aorta infrarrenal realizadas no período de uma década (de 2008 a 2017) foram estudadas utilizando-se plataformas publicamente disponíveis do Sistema Único de Saúde e do Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. Resultados Foram analisados ​​2.693 procedimentos, entre os quais 66,73% eram endovasculares. Entre os pacientes, houve predominância do sexo masculino (78,7%) e daqueles com 65 anos ou mais (70,7%). Um total de 64,02% eram admissões hospitalares eletivas. Ocorreram 288 óbitos hospitalares (mortalidade: 10,69%). A mortalidade durante a internação foi menor para cirurgia endovascular do que para cirurgia aberta tanto no contexto eletivo (4,13% versus 14,42%) quanto urgente (9,73% versus 27,94%) (p = 0,019). O maior volume (n = 635) apresentou menor mortalidade intra-hospitalar (3,31%). Foi pago um total de $24.835.604,84, sendo uma média de $2.318,63 para cirurgia abertura eletiva, $3.420,10 para cirurgia abertura de emergência, $12.157,35 para cirurgia endovascular eletiva e $12.969,12 para cirurgia endovascular na urgência. Os custos dos procedimentos endovasculares foram estatisticamente superiores aos valores pagos para as cirurgias abertas (p < 0,001). Conclusões Foram realizadas duas vezes mais cirurgias endovasculares do que abertas, as quais apresentaram menor tempo de internação e menor mortalidade.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Sistema Único de Saúde , Brasil , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Tempo de Internação
2.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 72(1): 59-63, feb. 2020. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092891

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción Las fístulas aorto-entéricas (FAE) son una causa infrecuente de hemorragia digestiva. El pronóstico, generalmente ominoso, depende de una alta sospecha clínica y diagnóstico oportuno. Caso clínico Reportamos el caso de una mujer de 66 años intervenida por un aneurisma sacular aórtico abdominal (AAA) yuxtarrenal, con rotura contenida, fistulizado al duodeno. Presentó una hemorragia digestiva en el preoperatorio; sin embargo, el diagnóstico de la fístula se hizo en el intraoperatorio. La paciente fue sometida a reparación quirúrgica urgente con instalación de una prótesis aórtica bifemoral y resección duodenal. En el postoperatorio inmediato presentó una trombosis parcial de las ramas de la prótesis aórtica e isquemia de extremidades, siendo reintervenida exitosamente. Discusión La FAE es una causa potencialmente fatal de hemorragia digestiva. El diagnóstico continúa siendo un desafío debido a su presentación inespecífica y siempre debiese ser considerado frente a una hemorragia digestiva sin causa aparente. Existen varias opciones para el enfrentamiento quirúrgico que deben ser analizadas caso a caso, sin retrasar la reparación de la fístula. Es preferible la resección duodenal ante la simple duodenorrafia.


Introduction Aorto-enteric fistulae (AEF) are a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. The prognosis tends to be ominous, depending greatly in a high level of clinical suspicion and prompt diagnosis. Clinical case We report a case of a 66-year-old female with a saccular juxta-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), with a contained rupture. The patient was urgently submitted to surgical repair using an bifemoral aortic prosthesis. A duodenal partial resection was performed. During the immediate postoperative time she presented partial thrombosis of prosthesis and ischemia of lower extremities so she was reoperated successfully. Discussion AEF is a potentially fatal cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnosis is still troublesome due to its vague presentation and it should always be considered when facing gastrointestinal haemorrhage with no apparent cause. There are several surgical approaches that should be pondered case to case without delaying the repair of the defect.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Doenças da Aorta/complicações , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Fístula Intestinal/complicações , Duodenopatias/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Fístula Intestinal/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Período Perioperatório , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico
3.
Rev. cuba. angiol. cir. vasc ; 20(2)jul.-dic. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1003859

RESUMO

Introducción: la incorporación de la ecografía a los métodos diagnósticos de los aneurismas aórticos abdominales favorece su detección precoz. Objetivo: Describir las características de los pacientes a quienes se les detectó precozmente un aneurisma aórtico abdominal. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal en 243 pacientes pertenecientes al área de salud del Hospital Clinicoquirúrgico "General Freyre de Andrade", clasificados como población de riesgo (hombres > 50 años y mujeres > 60 años). El periodo de estudio: noviembre de 2016 a octubre de 2017. Resultados: Se realizó el diagnóstico de aneurisma aórtico abdominal en 2,1 por ciento (n= 5); en estos pacientes prevaleció el grupo de edad de 70 a79 años (80 por ciento) y el sexo masculino (60 por ciento). Los factores de riesgo predominantes fueron el tabaquismo, la hipertensión arterial y la enfermedad arterial periférica, todos con igual porcentaje (100 por ciento). El segmento aórtico más afectado fue el infrarrenal (100 por ciento), los diámetros aórticos predominantes fueron: transversal (3-3,9 cm), longitudinal (5-10 cm) y antero-posterior (3-3,9 cm). La proteína C reactiva estuvo incrementada (mayor de 5 mg/L) en el 100 por ciento de los casos. La claudicación intermitente fue la más frecuente. Conclusiones: A pesar de la baja prevalencia porcentual encontrada, destaca en todos los pacientes con aneurisma aórtico abdominal la presencia de factores de riesgo relevantes como es el tabaquismo, la hipertensión arterial y la enfermedad arterial periférica; incremento en la concentración de la proteína C reactiva, afectación en el segmento infrarrenal así como alto porcentaje con edades por encima de 70 años(AU)


Introduction: The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the population benefits from the incorporation of ultrasound to diagnostic methods due to the importance of their early detection. Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients who are early detected with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 243 patients belonging to the health area of "General Freyre de Andrade" Clinical- Surgical Hospital that were classified as a risk population (men > 50 years and women > 60 years). The study was conducted from November 2016 to October 2017. Results: The diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm was performed in 2.1 percent (n= 5); in these patients predominated the age group of 70 to 79 years (80 percent), male sex (60 percent) and white skin color (80 percent). The predominant risk factors were smoking habit, arterial hypertension and peripheral arterial disease; all with equal percentage (100 percent). The most affected aortic segment was the infrarenal (100 percent), the predominant aortic diameters were: transversal (3-3.9 cm), longitudinal (5-10 cm) and anterior-posterior (3-3.9 cm). The C-reactive protein increased (greater than 5 mg/L) in 100 percent of the cases. Intermittent claudication was the most frequent. Conclusions: Although the percentage prevalence of the disease was low, it was present in all the patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, risk factors that are favorable to aneurysms, high concentrations of C-reactive protein, affectation in the infrarenal aortic segment, and high percentage of ages of more than 70 years(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Proteína C-Reativa/ultraestrutura , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco
4.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(3): 327-334, Jun. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013461

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The main goal of our study was to assess the impact of vascular procedures on the activity of hemostatic and fibrinolytic pathways. Methods: We enrolled 38 patients with ≥ 45 years old undergoing surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm or peripheral artery disease under general or regional anesthesia and who were hospitalized at least one night after the procedure. Patients undergoing carotid artery surgery and those who had acute bypass graft thrombosis, cancer, renal failure defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73m2, venous thromboembolism three months prior to surgery, or acute infection were excluded from the study. We measured levels of markers of hemostasis (factor VIII, von Willebrand factor:ristocetin cofactor [vWF:CoR], antithrombin), fibrinolysis (D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator [tPA], plasmin-antiplasmin complexes), and soluble cluster of differentiation 40 ligand (sCD40L) before and 6-12h after vascular procedure. Results: Significant differences between preoperative and postoperative levels of factor VIII (158.0 vs. 103.3, P<0.001), antithrombin (92.1 vs. 74.8, P<0.001), D-dimer (938.0 vs. 2406.0, P=0.005), tPA (10.1 vs. 12.8, P=0.002), and sCD40L (9092.9 vs. 1249.6, P<0.001) were observed. There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative levels of vWF:CoR (140.6 vs. 162.8, P=0.17) and plasmin-antiplasmin complexes (749.6 vs. 863.7, P=0.21). Conclusion: Vascular surgery leads to significant alterations in hemostatic and fibrinolytic systems. However, the direction of these changes in both pathways remains unclear and seems to be different depending on the type of surgery. A study utilizing dynamic methods of coagulation and fibrinolysis assessment performed on a larger population is warranted.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Coagulação Sanguínea/fisiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Fibrinólise/fisiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Biomarcadores/sangue , Projetos Piloto , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Período Pré-Operatório
5.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(3): 279-284, Jun. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013475

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the operative mortality rate and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between young and geriatric people in a single center. Methods: Eighty-five patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent EVAR between January 2012 and September 2016 were included. Outcomes were compared between two groups: the young (aged < 65 years) and the geriatric (aged ≥ 65 years). The primary study outcome was technical success; the secondary endpoints were mortality and secondary interventions. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (3-60 months). Results: The study included 72 males and 13 females with a mean age of 71.08±8.6 years (range 49-85 years). Of the 85 patients analyzed, 18 (21.2%) were under 65 years old and 67 patients (78.8%) were over 65 years old. There was no statistically significant correlation between chronic disease and age. We found no statistically significant difference between aneurysm diameter, neck angle, neck length, or right and left iliac angles. The secondary intervention rate was 7% (six patients). The conversion to open surgery was necessary for only one patient and only three deaths were reported (3.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and reintervention rates between the age groups. The three deaths occurred only in the geriatric group and two died secondary to rupture. Kidney failure was observed in three patients in the geriatric group (4.5%). Conclusion: Our single-center experience shows that EVAR can be used safely in both young and geriatric patients.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Valores de Referência , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Fatores Etários , Resultado do Tratamento , Distribuição por Sexo , Distribuição por Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/cirurgia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade
6.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 33(3): 265-270, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-958405

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: This study aims to compare open surgical and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms in terms of their effects on quality of life, using Short Form-36 (SF-36). Methods: A total of 133 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR or open surgical repair for infra-renal abdominal aorta aneurysm between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in the study. Twenty-six (19.5%) patients died during follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Overall, 107 patients, 39 (36.4%) in the open repair group, and 68 (63.6%) in the EVAR group, completed all follow-up visits and study assessments. Quality of life assessments using SF-36 were performed before surgery and at post-operative months 1, 6, and 12. Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 29.55±19.95 months. At one month, both physical and mental domains of the quality of life assessments favored EVAR, while the two surgical approaches did not differ significantly at or after six months postoperatively. Conclusion: Despite anatomical advantages and acceptable mid-phase mortality in patients with high- or medium-risk for open surgery, EVAR did not exhibit a quality of life superiority over open surgery in terms of physical function and patient comfort at or after postoperative six months.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Qualidade de Vida , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Período Pós-Operatório , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Período Pré-Operatório , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade
7.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 32(1): 43-48, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-843462

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To evaluate our experience following the introduction of a percutaneous program for endovascular treatment of aortic diseases using Perclose Proglide® assessing efficacy, complications and identification of potential risk factors that could predict failure or major access site complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort study during a two-year period was performed. All the patients submitted to totally percutaneous endovascular repair (PEVAR) of aortic diseases and transcatheter aortic valve implantation since we started the total percutaneous approach with the preclosure technique from November 2013 to December 2015 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was major ipsilateral access complication, defined according to PEVAR trial. Results: In a cohort of 123 patients, immediate technical success was obtained in 121 (98.37%) patients, with only two (0.82%) cases in 242 vascular access sites that required intervention immediately after the procedure. Pairwise comparisons revealed increased major access complication among patients with >50% common femoral artery (CFA) calcification vs. none (P=0.004) and > 50% CFA calcification vs. < 50% CFA calcification (P=0.002). Small artery diameter (<6.5 mm) also increased major access complication compared to bigger diameters (> 6.5 mm) (P=0.027). Conclusion: The preclosure technique with two Perclose Proglide® for PEVAR is safe and effective. Complications occur more often in patients with unfavorable access site anatomy and the success rate can be improved with proper patient selection.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Artéria Femoral
8.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 31(6): 415-421, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-843453

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The endovascular repair of aortic abdominal aneurysms exposes the patients and surgical team to ionizing radiation with risk of direct tissue damage and induction of gene mutation. This study aims to describe our standard of radiation exposure in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and the factors that influence it. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients with abdominal infra-renal aortic aneurysms submitted to endovascular repair. This study evaluated the radiation doses (dose area product (DAP)), fluoroscopy durations and their relationships to the patients, aneurysms, and stent-graft characteristics. Results: This study included 127 patients with a mean age of 73 years. The mean DAP was 4.8 mGy.m2, and the fluoroscopy time was 21.8 minutes. Aortic bilateral iliac aneurysms, higher body mass index, aneurysms with diameters larger than 60 mm, necks with diameters larger than 28 mm, common iliac arteries with diameters larger than 20 mm, and neck angulations superior to 50 degrees were associated with an increased radiation dose. The number of anatomic risk factors present was associated with increased radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time, regardless of the anatomical risk factors. Conclusion: The radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is significant (mean DAP 4.8 mGy.m2) with potential hazards to the surgical team and the patients. The anatomical characteristics of the aneurysm, patient characteristics, and the procedure's technical difficulty were all related to increased radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair procedures. Approximately 40% of radiation exposure can be explained by body mass index, neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, neck diameter, and aneurysm type.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doses de Radiação , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Exposição à Radiação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Fluoroscopia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Exposição Ocupacional , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos
9.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 31(3): 232-238, May.-June 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-796122

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Abdominal aortic aneurysm has a lower incidence in the female population, but a higher complication rate. It was been hypothesized that some anatomical differences of abdominal aortic aneurysm in women could be responsible for that. We proposed to analyze our data to understand the differences in the clinical and anatomical characteristics and the outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, according to gender. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair between 2001-2013 was performed. Patients were divided according gender and evaluated regarding age, atherosclerotic risk factors, aneurysm anatomic features, endograft type, anesthesic risk classification, length of stay, reinterventions and mortality. Two statistical studies were performed, first comparing women and men (Group A) and a second one comparing women and men, adjusted by age (Group B). Results: Of the 171 patients, only 5.8% (n=10) were females. Women were older (P<0.05) and the number of women with no atherosclerotic risk factor was significantly higher. The comparison adjusted by age revealed women with statistically less smoking history, less cerebrovascular disease and ischemic heart disease. Women had a trend to more complex anatomy, with more iliac intern artery aneurysms, larger aneurysm diameter and neck angulations statistically more elevated. No other variables were statistically different between age groups, neither reintervention nor mortality rates. Conclusion: Our study showed a clear difference in the clinical characteristics of women. The female population was statistically older, and when compared with men adjusted by age, had less atherosclerotic risk factors and less target organ disease. Women showed a more complex anatomy but with the same outcomes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores Sexuais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sobrevida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Distribuição por Idade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Endoleak , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação
10.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 31(2): 132-139, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-792656

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the therapy of choice in high risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. The good results described are leading to the broadening of clinical indications to younger patients. However, reintervention rates seem higher and even with successful treatment sometimes there is growth of the aneurysm sac and rupture, meaning a failure of the therapeutic goal. This study proposes to analyse the impact of age in patients' selection and post-EVAR results. Methods: The clinical records of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, between 2001 and 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided according to age groups (<70, 70-80 and >80 years). Gender, body mass index, aneurysm anatomic features, neck characteristics, iliac morphology, surgical indication, endograft type, anesthesic risk classification, length of stay, reinterventions and mortality were analysed and compared. Results: The study included 171 patients, 161 (94.1%) men, and mean age 74.1±8.9 years. The age group under 70 had 32% of the patients. Only three characteristics were found different among age groups: 1) body mass index was higher in younger patients, with a considerable trend toward significance (P=0.06); 2) surgical indication, in the younger group, surgeon's and the patient's option were more proeminent (P<0.05); 3) erectile dysfunction was higher in elderly group (P<0.05). No other clinical and anatomical characteristics or final outcomes were found statisticaly different among age groups. Conclusion: The absence of statistically differences in mortality and reinterventions among age groups suggests that age by itself is not a relevant factor in endovascular aneurysm repair. Indeed, the three characteristics different in younger (obesity, sexual function and patient's choice) favor endovascular aneurysm repair.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores Etários , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Período Pós-Operatório , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Aneurisma Ilíaco/complicações , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Disfunção Erétil/complicações
11.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 31(2): 98-105, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-792653

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was introduced as a less aggressive treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for patients ineligible for open repair (OR). Objective: To analyze EVAR's incorporation impact in the treatment of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms in our institution. Methods: A retrospective study of the patients with diagnostic of infra-renal AAA treated between December 2001 and December 2013 was performed. The choice between EVAR and OR was based on surgeon's experience, considering patient clinical risk and aneurysm's anatomical features. Patients treated by EVAR and by OR were analyzed. In each group, patient's and aneurysm's characteristics, surgical and anesthesia times, cost, transfusion rate, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality and re-intervention rates and survival curves were evaluated. Results: The mean age, all forms of heart disease and chronic renal failure were more common in EVAR group. Blood transfusion, surgical and anesthesia times and mean hospital stay were higher for OR. Intraoperative complications rate was higher for endovascular aneurysm repair, overall during hospitalization complication rate was higher for open repair. The average cost in endovascular aneurysm repair was 1448.3€ higher. Re-interventions rates within 30 days and late re-intervention were 4.1% and 11.7% for endovascular aneurysm repair versus 13.7% and 10.6% for open repair. Conclusions: Two different groups were treated by two different techniques. The individualized treatment choice allows to achieve a mortality of 2.7%. Age ≥80 years influences survival curve in OR group and ASA ≥IV in EVAR group. We believe EVAR's incorporation improved the results of OR itself. Patients with more comorbidities were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair, decreasing those excluded from treatment. Late reinterventions were similar for both techniques.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Etários , Resultado do Tratamento , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 56(2): 101-104, Mar.-Apr. 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-780944

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Chronic periaortitis (CP) is an umbrella term used to describe a group of nosologically allied conditions that include idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (Ormond's disease), inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm, and perianeurysmal retroperitoneal fibrosis. Retroperitoneal fibrosis encompasses a range of diseases characterized by the presence of a fibro-inflammatory tissue, which usually surrounds the abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries and extends into the retroperitoneum to envelop neighboring structures-ureters. Retroperitoneal fibrosis is generally idiopathic, but can also be secondary to the use of certain drugs, malignant diseases, infections, and surgery. Here we describe a 5 years follow up (2006-2011) of 5 patients admitted to our hospital with symptoms, laboratory, imaging and pathologic finding compatible with retroperitoneal fibrosis. We review our clinical course of our patient with respect to the literature.


RESUMO Periaortite crônica (PC) é um termo genérico usado para descrever um grupo de condições nosologicamente ligadas que incluem a fibrose idiopática retroperitoneal (doença de Ormond), o aneurisma da aorta abdominal inflamatório e a fibrose retroperitoneal perianeurismática. O termo fibrose retroperitoneal engloba uma gama de doenças que se caracterizam pela presença de um tecido fibroinflamatório que geralmente envolve a aorta abdominal e as artérias ilíacas, se estende ao retroperitôneo e envolve estruturas ureterais vizinhas. A fibrose retroperitoneal geralmente é idiopática, mas pode também ser secundária ao uso de determinados fármacos, doenças malignas, infecções e cirurgia. Este estudo descreve o seguimento por cinco anos (2006-2011) de cinco pacientes internados em nosso hospital que apresentavam sintomas e achados laboratoriais, de imagem e patológicos compatíveis com a fibrose retroperitoneal. Revisou-se a evolução clínica dos pacientes, que foi comparada com os achados da literatura.


Assuntos
Humanos , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aorta Abdominal , Fibrose Retroperitoneal , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/patologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/patologia
13.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 31(1): 22-30, Jan.-Feb. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-778372

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Curva ROC , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J. vasc. bras ; 14(1): 88-93, Jan-Mar/2015. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-744464

RESUMO

Aneurysms and thromboses of the portal vein are rare pathologies of the portal system that commonly follow an asymptomatic course. The vast majority of cases are diagnosed as incidental findings during imaging studies. Symptoms of aneurysms are the result of mass effects, while thrombosis symptoms are a function of the liver's ability to form a collateral circulation network in the thrombosis. The scant experience with such cases poses a dilemma for patient management and so the vast majority of authors choose an expectant approach with rigorous patient surveillance and only intervene in symptomatic patients. We report one case of an aneurysm of the portal vein and one case of portal vein thrombosis and discuss management and observation of these patients...


O aneurisma e a trombose de veia porta são doenças raras do sistema porta, que comumente cursam sem sintomas. A grande maioria dos pacientes é diagnosticada com achados em exames de imagem. Os sintomas são atribuídos ao efeito de massa, no caso do aneurisma, e relativos à capacidade hepática de formar uma rede de circulação colateral, no caso da trombose. A escassa experiência nesses casos representa um dilema na abordagem desses pacientes e, portanto, a grande maioria dos autores opta por seguimento rigoroso e a intervenção é indicada apenas para os pacientes sintomáticos. Neste trabalho, relatamos um caso de aneurisma de veia porta e outro de trombose da veia porta, propondo o manejo e o acompanhamento desses pacientes...


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Vasculares , Fígado Gorduroso/complicações , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia , Veia Porta/patologia , Abdome , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
15.
J. vasc. bras ; 13(4): 266-271, Oct-Dec/2014. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-736020

RESUMO

Background: Endovascular repair has become established as a safe and effective method for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. One major complication of this treatment is leakage, or endoleaks, of which type 2 leaks are the most common. Objective: To conduct a brief review of the literature and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of embolization by micronavigation for treatment of type 2 endoleaks. Method: A review of medical records from patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms identified 5 patients with persistent type 2 endoleaks. These patients were submitted to embolization by micronavigation. Results: In all cases, angiographic success was achieved and control CT scans showed absence of type 2 leaks and aneurysm sacs that had reduced in size after the procedure. Conclusion: Treatment of type 2 endoleaks using embolization by micronavigation is an effective and safe method and should be considered as a treatment option for this complication after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. .


Contexto: O reparo endovascular se estabeleceu como uma modalidade segura e efetiva no tratamento do Aneurisma de Aorta Abdominal. Uma das principais complicações deste tipo de tratamento é o Vazamento ou Endoleak, sendo o do tipo 2 o mais frequente deles. Objetivo: Fazer uma breve revisão de literatura e avaliar a segurança e a efetividade da embolização por micronavegação para o tratamento do Vazamento tipo 2. Método: A revisão dos prontuários dos pacientes submetidos ao Reparo Endovascular do Aneurisma de Aorta abdominal identificou cinco pacientes que apresentavam Endoleak tipo 2 persistente. Esses pacientes foram submetidos à embolização por micronavegação. Resultado: Em todos os casos, houve sucesso angiográfico e as tomografias de controle evidenciavam ausência de Vazamento tipo 2 e diminuição do saco aneurismático, após o procedimento. Conclusão: O tratamento do Endoleak tipo II por embolização por micronavegação é um método efetivo e seguro, sendo considerado uma opção para esta complicação após o Reparo Endovascular do Aneurisma de Aorta Abdominal. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica , Endoleak/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Efetividade , Resultado do Tratamento , Endoleak/etiologia , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem
16.
J. vasc. bras ; 13(4): 276-284, Oct-Dec/2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-736016

RESUMO

Context: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a condition that is usually asymptomatic, but potentially fatal, and has a prevalence in men over 60 years old ranging from 4.3% to 8%. There are two treatment options available: open surgery (OS) and endovascular treatment (ET). Objective: To compare the results of repairs conducted using these two treatment methods from 2008 to 2013 in a tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing 119 patients treated with OS and 219 patients who underwent ET for AAA repair. Results: The ET group was older (71.3 vs. 68.2 years; p<0.001) and had a higher rate of coronary disease (44.7% vs. 27.7%; p=0.002) and a lower ejection fraction (57.6% vs. 64.3%; p<0.001); in turn, the OS group had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.0% vs. 5.9%; p=0.004) and a smaller proximal infrarenal neck (15.5 mm vs. 23.0 mm; p<0.001). However, there was no difference in ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiology) (p=0.36). The ET group had less intraoperative bleeding (171 mL vs. 729 mL; p<0.001) and required fewer blood transfusions (11.9% vs. 73.1% p<0.001), and spent shorter stays in both ICU (2.4 vs. 3.5 days; p=0.002) and hospital (5.8 vs. 10.3 days; p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was similar (OS 5.0% vs. ET 4.1%; p=0.78) and there was also no difference in postoperative complications. The average cost of ET was higher (R$34,277.76 vs. R$4,778.60; p<0.001). Conclusions: Rates of morbidity and mortality were similar, although ET was associated with less bleeding, fewer transfusions and shorter hospital stays, but was more expensive. .


Contexto: O aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) é uma condição frequentemente assintomática, porém potencialmente fatal, cuja prevalência em homens com 60 anos ou mais está entre 4,3% e 8%. Existem duas modalidades de tratamento disponíveis: cirurgia aberta (TA) e endovascular (TE). Objetivo: Comparar os resultados dessas duas modalidades de tratamento, entre 2008 e 2013, em um hospital terciário. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva comparando 119 pacientes submetidos ao TA e 219 pacientes submetidos ao TE, para correção de AAA. Resultados: O grupo submetido ao TE apresentou maior idade (71,3 vs. 68,2 anos; p<0,001) e doença coronariana (44,7% vs. 27,7%; p=0,002), além de menor fração de ejeção (57,6% vs. 64,3%; p<0,001); por sua vez, o grupo submetido ao TA exibiu mais doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (16,0% vs. 5,9%; p=0,004) e menor colo proximal infrarrenal (15,5 mm vs. 23,0 mm; p<0,001). Entretanto, não houve diferença na classificação ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) (p=0,36). O grupo de TE apresentou menor sangramento intraoperatório (171 mL vs. 729 mL; p<0,001), com menor necessidade de hemotransfusão (11,9% vs. 73,1% p<0,001), menor permanência em UTI (2,4 vs. 3,5 dias; p=0,002) e menor tempo de internação hospitalar (5,8 vs. 10,3 dias; p<0,001). A mortalidade em 30 dias foi semelhante (TA 5,0% vs. TE 4,1%; p=0,78), também não havendo diferença nas complicações pós-operatórias. O custo médio do TE foi maior (R$34.277,76 vs. R$4.778,60; p<0,001). Conclusão: As taxas de morbimortalidade foram semelhantes, sendo no TE o sangramento, a necessidade transfusional e a duração da internação hospitalar menores, porém com custo mais elevado. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Volume Sistólico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Tempo de Internação
17.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 12(4): 499-501, Oct-Dec/2014. graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-732463

RESUMO

O avanço tecnológico da cirurgia endovascular no tratamento de aneurismas de aorta vem permitindo que uma maior quantidade de pacientes, antes considerados inaptos para essa abordagem, beneficie-se dessa modalidade terapêutica. Apesar da atual disponibilidade de endopróteses com alta conformabilidade, casos com anatomia desfavorável permanecem um desafio para os cirurgiões. Descrevemos um caso anatomicamente desfavorável, resolvido com sucesso pela técnica endovascular, utilizando-se uma manobra não convencional.


The advances in endovascular surgery for treatment of aortic aneurysms have allowed a greater number of patients, who were previously considered unsuitable for the approach, to benefit from this therapeutic modality. Despite the current availability of highly comfortable endografts, cases with unfavorable anatomy remain a challenge for surgeons. We report a case with difficult anatomy that was successfully managed using an unconventional endovascular technique.


Assuntos
Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Clinics ; 69(6): 420-425, 6/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-712705

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our early experience in the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with bifurcated endografts. We report on our initial twelve-month experience using this approach. METHODS: Clinical data on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms treated at a single tertiary center in Brazil were prospectively recorded. The eligibility for endovascular treatment was evaluated by computed tomography scanning and anatomical features were determined based on the method of treatment. RESULTS: From February 2012 to January 2013 (12 months), 28 consecutive patients (mean age 67.2 years, range 45-85 years) underwent treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms at our hospital. Eighteen patients (64.3%) were suitable for and underwent endovascular treatment with bifurcated endografts (16 patients) or aortouniiliac endografts (two patients). Ten patients who were considered unsuitable for endograft repair underwent open repair. Seven patients were classified as hemodynamically unstable (Endovascular, 5; Open, 2), and 21 were classified as stable (Endovascular, 13; Open, 8). The overall 30-day mortality rate associated with endovascular treatment was 27.8% (stable, 18.7%; unstable, 40%) and the rate associated with open repair was 50% (stable, 37.5%; unstable, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the suitability of patients for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms was high and the overall results of endovascular treatment remain encouraging. Indeed, bifurcated endografts are a feasible option for treating anatomically eligible ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. .


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Rev. chil. cir ; 65(6): 515-519, dic. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-698645

RESUMO

Background: Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms is less invasive than the traditional surgical approach. Aim: To evaluate the early and mid-term results of aorto-iliac aneurysm endovascular repair. Material and Methods: Analysis of 28 patients aged 59 to 86 years (22 males), subjected to an endovas-cular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms between 2007 and 2012. Results: The follow up period of patients ranged from 1 to 65 months. A tri-modular bifurcated prosthesis was installed in 25 patients. A bi-modular bifurcated prosthesis was installed in one patient, an aorto uni iliac prosthesis was installed in one patient; in other patient, a straight endoprosthesis was installed after an abdominal visceral disconnection. In cases of associated iliac aneurysms, unilateral iliac embolization was carried out in seven patients and bilateral embolization in one patient. In one case, the sealing of the hypogastric artery was achieved leaning the prosthetic branch on the hypogastric artery ostium. One patient died 31 days after the operation due to multiple organ failure. One patient died 24 months after surgery due to a gallbladder cancer and other patient died 36 months after surgery due to a rectal cancer. The long-term follow-up showed the presence of type 2 endo-leaks in two patients. The aneurysm decreased in size in 83 percent of patients after 2 years of follow-up. In five patients, a non-progressive laminar parietal thrombosis inside the endoprosthesis, was observed in the immediate postoperative period. It was initially treated with oral anticoagulants. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms is safe and effective in patients with appropriate anatomical conditions, if a skilled surgical team is available...


Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados iniciales y en el mediano plazo de la reparación endovascular de los aneurismas del sector aorto-ilíaco. Material y Método: Revisión de una serie clínica de pacientes operados en forma consecutiva por vía endovascular en el Hospital Dr. Eduardo Pereira de Valparaíso por aneurismas del sector aorto-ilíaco desde 2007 al 2012 con seguimiento actualizado. Resultados: Se trata de 28 pacientes (22 varones), una edad promedio de 72,5 años (rango 59-86) y un seguimiento promedio de 27,4 meses (rango 1-65 meses). Los pacientes fueron seleccionados de acuerdo a la anatomía aorto-ilíaca y su estado general. A 25 pacientes se les instaló una prótesis bifurcada tri-modular, a un paciente una prótesis bifurcada con sólo dos módulos, a otro paciente una prótesis aorto uni ilíaca, y a una paciente una endoprótesis recta luego de una desconexión visceral abdominal. Un paciente fallece a los 31 días después de operado por falla orgánica múltiple y otros dos pacientes fallecen a los 24 meses a causa de un cáncer vesicular y a los 36 meses por un cáncer rectal. El seguimiento alejado evidenció ausencia de endofugas tipo 1, 3 ó 4 y una endofuga tipo 2 en dos pacientes, que no han requerido ninguna intervención. Conclusión: La reparación endovascular de los aneurismas del sector aorto-ilíaco es segura en el corto y mediano plazo, en pacientes con las condiciones anatómicas apropiadas en un centro quirúrgico adecuadamente equipado...


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Seguimentos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1170932

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) reduces morbidity and hospital stay compaired with open surgical repair. Endoleak is a common complication of the procedure. The resulting increase of pressure within the sac may expand the aneurysm with the following risk of rupture. The aim of this study was to recognize the incidence of endoleak in tomographic controls of the patients who underwent endovascular repair at our hospital as well as identify the risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: all consecutive patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair at our hospital between 2008, February until 2012, February were restrospectively enrolled in the study, excluding those who were lost at follow-up. 43 patients were included, aged 70.5 ± 6 (men: 88


). The endpoint was endoleak incidence at 1, 6, 12th months after the intervention in the control tomography, and its association with underlying risk factors: hypertension, Smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary desease and the diameter of the aneurysm. RESULTS: eleven (11


). All were infrarrenal aortic aneurysms. The anteroposterior diameter of the aneurysm (more than 60 mm) showed a trend toward statistical significance as a risk factor (30


; p:0.073). No relationship was found with gender, age, COPD, smoking or hypertension. CONCLUSION: endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair is a common complication. The size of the aneurysm might be a risk factor of the event.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Endoleak/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Argentina/epidemiologia , Endoleak/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Etários , Fatores de Risco , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA