Ivabradine Improves Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy / Ivabradina Melhora a Variabilidade da Frequência Cardíaca em Pacientes com Cardiomiopatia Dilatada Não Isquêmica

Background: Ivabradine is a novel specific heart rate (HR)-lowering agent that improves event-free survival in patients with heart failure (HF). Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of ivabradine on time domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with HF. Methods: Forty-eight patients with compensated HF of nonischemic origin were included. Ivabradine treatment was initiated according to the latest HF guidelines. For HRV analysis, 24-h Holter recording was obtained from each patient before and after 8 weeks of treatment with ivabradine. Results: The mean RR interval, standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals (SDNN), the standard deviation of 5-min mean RR intervals (SDANN), the mean of the standard deviation of all normal-to-normal RR intervals for all 5-min segments (SDNN index), the percentage of successive normal RR intervals exceeding 50 ms (pNN50), and the square root of the mean of the squares of the differences between successive normal to normal RR intervals (RMSSD) were low at baseline before treatment with ivabradine. After 8 weeks of treatment with ivabradine, the mean HR (83.6 ± 8.0 and 64.6 ± 5.8, p < 0.0001), mean RR interval (713 ± 74 and 943 ± 101 ms, p < 0.0001), SDNN (56.2 ± 15.7 and 87.9 ± 19.4 ms, p < 0.0001), SDANN (49.5 ± 14.7 and 76.4 ± 19.5 ms, p < 0.0001), SDNN index (24.7 ± 8.8 and 38.3 ± 13.1 ms, p < 0.0001), pNN50 (2.4 ± 1.6 and 3.2 ± 2.2 %, p < 0.0001), and RMSSD (13.5 ± 4.6 and 17.8 ± 5.4 ms, p < 0.0001) substantially improved, which sustained during both when awake and while asleep. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that treatment with ivabradine improves HRV in nonischemic patients with HF. .

Fundamento: A ivabradina é um novo agente redutor específico da frequência cardíaca (FC) que melhora a sobrevida livre de eventos de pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC). Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da ivabradina nos índices temporais da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca (VFC) em pacientes com IC. Métodos: Quarenta e oito pacientes com IC compensada de etiologia não-isquêmica foram incluídos no estudo. O tratamento com ivabradina foi iniciado de acordo com as recomendações mais recentes para a IC. O Holter de 24 horas foi utilizado para analisar os índices da VFC em cada paciente antes e após 8 semanas de tratamento com ivabradina. Resultados: Todos os índices da VFC, o intervalo RR médio, o desvio padrão de todos os intervalos RR normais (DPNN), o desvio padrão de intervalos RR médios de 5 minutos (DPNNM), a média do desvio padrão de todos os intervalos RR normais para todos os segmentos de 5 minutos (índice DPNN), porcentagem de intervalos RR normais sucessivos superiores a 50 milissegundos (pNN50), e a raiz quadrada da média dos quadrados das diferenças entre intervalos RR sucessivos (RMQQD) apresentaram redução no ínicio do estudo, antes do tratamento com ivabradina. Após 8 semanas de tratamento com ivabradina, as médias das FC (83,6 ± 8,0 e 64,6 ± 5,8, p < 0,0001) e todos os índices da VFC, médias dos intervalos RR (713 ± 74 e 943 ± 101 ms, p < 0,0001), DPNN (56,2 ± 15,7 e 87,9 ± 19,4 ms, p < 0,0001), DPNNM (49,5 ± 14,7 e 76,4 ± 19,5 ms, p < 0,0001), índice DPNN (24,7 ± 8,8 e 38,3 ± 13,1 ms, p < 0,0001), pNN50 (2,4 ± 1,6 e 3,2 ± 2,2%, p < 0,0001) e RMQQD (13,5 ± 4,6 e 17,8 ± 5,4 ms , p < 0,0001), foram substancialmente melhorados, e permaneceram nestas ...

Comparação do desfecho entre a cardiopatia chagásica e a miocardiopatia dilatada idiopática / Comparison of outcome between Chagas cardiomyopathy and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

FUNDAMENTO: Pouco se sabe sobre o desfecho dos pacientes com cardiopatia chagásica, em comparação aos pacientes com miocardiopatia dilatada idiopática na era contemporânea. OBJETIVO: Comparar o desfecho dos pacientes chagásicos com insuficiência cardíaca sistólica crônica decorrente da cardiopatia chagásica ao observado em pacientes com MDI na era contemporânea. MÉTODOS: Foi incluído um total de 352 pacientes (246 com cardiomiopatia chagásica e 106 com miocardiopatia dilatada idiopática), seguidos prospectivamente em nossa Instituição, de janeiro de 2000 a janeiro de 2008. Todos os pacientes receberam tratamento clínico contemporâneo padrão. RESULTADOS: Na análise multivariada com o modelo de risco proporcional de Cox, o uso da digoxina (relação de risco = 3,17; intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento, de 1,62 a 6,18; p = 0,001) necessitou de suporte inotrópico (relação de risco = 2,08; intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento, de 1,43 a 3,02; p < 0,005). A fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (relação de risco = 0,97; intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento, de 0,95 a 0,99; p < 0,005) e a etiologia da cardiopatia chagásica (relação de risco = 3,29; intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento, de 1,89 a 5,73; p < 0,005) foram associadas positivamente à mortalidade, enquanto a terapia com betabloqueadores (relação de risco = 0,39; intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento, de 0,26 a 0,56; p < 0,005) foi associada negativamente à mortalidade. A probabilidade de sobrevida para pacientes com cardiomiopatia chagásica em oito, 24 e 49 meses foi de 83 por cento, 61 por cento e 41 por cento, respectivamente. Já para pacientes com cardiomiopatia dilatada idiopática, foi de 97 por cento, 92 por cento e 82 por cento, respectivamente (p < 0,005). CONCLUSÃO: Na era atual do tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca, os pacientes com cardiomiopatia chagásica têm um desfecho pior em comparação aos pacientes com cardiomiopatia dilatada idiopática.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the outcome of patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy in comparison to that of patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy in the contemporary era. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of chagasic patients with chronic systolic heart failure secondary to Chagas cardiomyopathy with that observed in patients with IDC in the contemporary era. METHODS: A total of 352 patients (246 with Chagas cardiomyopathy, 106 with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy) prospectively followed at our Institution from January, 2000 to January, 2008 were included. All patients received standard contemporary medical therapy. RESULTS: In Cox proportional hazards model multivariate analysis, digoxin use (Hazard Ratio=3.17; 95 percent Confidence Interval 1.62 to 6.18; p=0.001), need of inotropic support (Hazard Ratio=2.08; 95 percent Confidence Interval 1.43 to 3.02; p<0.005), left ventricular ejection fraction (Hazard Ratio=0.97; 95 percent Confidence Interval 0.95 to 0.99; p<0.005), and Chagas cardiomyopathy etiology (Hazard Ratio=3.29; 95 percent Confidence Interval 1.89 to 5.73; p<0.005) were positively associated with mortality, whereas Beta-Blocker therapy (Hazard Ratio=0.39; 95 percent Confidence Interval 0.26 to 0.56; p<0.005) was negatively associated with mortality. Survival probability for patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy at 8, 24, and 49 months was 83 percent, 61 percent, and 41 percent, respectively, and for patients with Idiopathic Dilated cardiomyopathy 97 percent, 92 percent, and 82 percent, respectively (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: In the current era of heart failure therapy, patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy have a poorer outcome in comparison to patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Dilated cardiomyopathy: a clinical review of patients evaluated at a Tertiary Care Center in Puerto Rico

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes, epidemiologic baseline data and clinical characteristics of a group of patients referred to a tertiary care center in Puerto Rico with the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy.METHODS. The medical records of 91 new patients with the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy were analyzed. Data was recopilated regarding initial medical history and physical examination, basic blood chemistry, electrocardiograms, chest films and other cardiac studies including echocardiogram, radionuclear ventriculography, cardiac catheterization, contrast ventriculography and coronary angiography. After reviewing the records the etiology for dilated cardiomyopathy was identified in each patient following the World Health Organization Task Forcecriteria. RESULTS. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was identified as the most common the reviewed patient population; an idiopathic etiology was found cause of dilated cardiomyopathy, representing 37 percent of in 22 percent of the patients and valvular heart disease in 14 percent. DISCUSSION. A comparison with previously described series in the medical literature regarding this subject is presented, along with the most prominent clinical characteristics of the studied population. It is felt that the findings presented will require further study of the underlying causes and clinical course of this condition in a larger patient sample and a longer follow-up period