Tratamiento Quirúrgico de la estenosis bulbomembranosa secundaria a fractura pelviana: resultados funcionales / Bulbomenbranous Urethral Stricture After Pelvic Fracture: Surgical Managment and Functional Outcomes

Objetivos: La incidencia de lesión uretral bulboprostática secundaria a fractura pelviana es del 5-10%. Una uretroplastia exitosa garantiza el comienzo de la rehabilitación de los pacientes. Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el manejo quirúrgico de la estenosis uretral secundaria a fractura pelviana y resultados funcionales: tasa de éxito, reestenosis, disfunción eréctil e incontinencia urinaria. Evaluamos si existe asociación entre la falta de erecciones postrauma y la reestenosis. Materiales y métodos: Cincuenta y tres pacientes fueron operados durante el período comprendido entre 2001 y 2015. Todos fueron estudiados con cistoscopia flexible, cistouretrografía retrógrada y miccional. La técnica quirúrgica empleada fue la resección y anastomosis primaria. Se utilizó siempre la sistemática del abordaje perineal progresivo para lograr una anastomosis sin tensión. Interrogamos sobre la calidad de las erecciones posterior al trauma y después de la cirugía, y su estado de continencia urinaria. Se realizó un análisis estadístico donde se evaluó si la falta de erecciones era un factor de riesgo para recaída. Resultados: La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 34,5 (r=17-67) años. La longitud promedio de la estenosis fue de 2,28 cm, siendo la uretra bulbomembranosa la más afectada (89%). La tasa de éxito fue del 86% (46/53), que asciende al 94% (50/53) al asociar un procedimiento endoscópico. Un solo paciente refirió disfunción eréctil postcirugía (1/19; 5,3%). Dos (3,7%) pacientes evolucionaron con incontinencia de orina de esfuerzo. No se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el grupo de pacientes con erecciones y aquellos sin erecciones en cuanto a la posibilidad de reestenosis. Conclusiones: La anastomosis bulbomembranosa por vía perineal es el tratamiento de elección de la estenosis uretral postfractura pelviana. Los índices de incontinencia de orina y disfunción eréctil no aumentan significativamente luego de la uretroplastia. En nuestra experiencia, la falta de erecciones preoperatoria no predice mayor índice de recaídas(AU)

Objectives: Bulboprostatic urethral stricture after pelvic fracture occurs in about 5-10%. A successful urethroplasty guarantees the beginning of patient recovery. We present our experience in the surgical management of posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture and functional outcomes (success and failure rates, erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence). The association between the lack of erections post-trauma and the incidence of restenosis was also evaluated. Materials and methods: 53 patients were operated between 2001- 2015. Preop workout included a flexible cystoscopy and a combination of retrograde and voiding cystourethrogram to define the site and length of urethral stricture. Resection and primary anastomosis was the technique always employed. In all cases the progressive perineal approach was followed in order to achieve a tension free anastomosis. Erectile function and urinary continence were evaluated before and after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate if lack of erections was a failure predictor. Results: Median age was 34.5 (r=17-67) years. Median urethral stricture length was 2.28 cm. Bulbomembranous junction was the most affected portion (89%). Success rate was 86% (46/53) ascending to 94% (50/53) when an endoscopic procedure was associated. One patient referred erectile dysfunction after surgery (1/19; 5.3%). Two patients (3.7%) developed stress urinary incontinence. The restenosis rate did not show statiscally differences between the erectile dysfunction and non-erectile dysfunction group. Conclusions: Perineal bulbomembranous anastomosis is the elected procedure for urethral stricture after pelvic fracture. Incidence of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are not significantly elevated after urethroplasty. In our experience, lack of erections before surgery does not predict a higher rate of restenosis(AU)

Comprehensive analysis of etiology on the prognosis of urethral strictures

INTRODUCTION: Urethral strictures remain a reconstructive dilemma, due to high incidence of recurrence and less than satisfactory outcomes. Even experienced surgeons following strict surgical principles have not achieved optimal results, leading us to think whether the etiology of strictures dictate the outcome . We evaluated this "cause-effect" relationship highlighting the significance of the etiology on the overall prognosis of urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 302 males with urethral strictures were assessed (both retrospectively and prospectively) over a period of ten years. The preoperative evaluation was performed by retrograde urethrogram, urethrosonogram, and uroflowmetry and categorized, based on etiology: a) as post traumatic, b) post infective, c) iatrogenic or d) unknown. Traumatic strictures were subjected to pelvic X-ray and sub-categorized into grades A, B and C, following the TILE classification. Patients were operated; with tunica albuginea urethroplasty for anterior strictures and U shape prostato-bulbar anastomosis for posterior strictures. RESULTS: Traumatic strictures accounted for 54 percent of cases. 127 of the 302 patients were treated using Tunica Albuginea Urethroplasty, while U shaped Prostatobulbar Anastomosis was performed on others. Post traumatic strictures had best outcome whereas post infective strictures had the worse outcome. Among strictures following pelvic fractures, TILE grades A and B had a better post operative course as compared to TILE C. Overall complication rate was 13.24 percent. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that etiology of urethral strictures may play a vital role for the overall prognosis of urethral strictures.