Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 47(7): 605-616, 07/2014. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-712966

RESUMO

We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the augmentation of antidepressants (ATDs) with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) to treat patients with major depressive disorder. A retrograde study to identify relevant patient data included databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Data from 17 trials, involving 3807 participants, were identified. The remission rate (RR) and overall response rate (ORR) of adjunctive treatment with AAPs were significantly higher than placebo treatment: RR=1.90 (95%CI=1.61-2.23, z=7.74, P<0.00001) and ORR=1.68 (95%CI=1.45-1.94, z=7.07, P<0.00001). We found that the short-term (4 weeks) treatment [ORR=1.70 (95%CI=0.98-2.95, Z=1.89, P=0.06)] was significantly different from the long-term (6-12 weeks) treatment [ORR=1.68 (95%CI=1.45-1.94, z=7.07, P<0.00001)]. No significant difference in ORR was observed between groups with or without sedative drugs. The discontinuation rate due to adverse effects was higher for adjunctive treatment with AAPs: ORR=3.32 (95%CI=2.35-4.70, z=6.78, P<0.00001). These results demonstrate that the augmentation of ATDs with AAPs (olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone) was more effective than a placebo in improving response and remission rates, although associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse effects.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Método Duplo-Cego , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Dibenzotiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Dibenzotiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Quinolonas/administração & dosagem , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Risperidona/administração & dosagem , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 30(3): 265-270, set. 2008. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-493782

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Revisar sistematicamente as evidências que sustentam o uso de antipsicóticos no tratamento dos sintomas comportamentais e psicológicos em pacientes com demência, assim como rever as controvérsias e desvantagens dessa prescrição, tendo em vista, por um lado, a elevada prevalência destas manifestações no curso clínico das demências e, por outro, a maior susceptibilidade do idoso aos eventos adversos desses medicamentos. MÉTODO: Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre o uso de antipsicóticos típicos e atípicos em pacientes portadores de síndromes demenciais. As bases de dados usadas para este fim foram o PubMed/Medline, Embase e SciELO. A busca por trabalhos se limitou aos anos de 1986 a 2007, selecionando-se ensaios clínicos randomizados e metanálises da literatura. RESULTADOS: Há evidências a partir de ensaios randomizados, duplamente encobertos, controlados por placebo, de que os antipsicóticos típicos e atípicos são eficazes no tratamento dos sintomas comportamentais que ocorrem nas síndromes demenciais, especialmente os quadros psicóticos e alterações do comportamento motor. Entretanto, o uso destas medicações está associado a eventos adversos importantes. Embora os antipsicóticos atípicos estejam menos associados aos efeitos colaterais extrapiramidais, comuns entre os neurolépticos de primeira geração, podem aumentar a incidência de eventos cerebrovasculares e do risco de morte, sobretudo em pacientes vulneráveis. CONCLUSÃO: Os antipsicóticos devem ser usados com cautela nos pacientes com demência, buscando otimizar o regime de dosagem e duração do tratamento, e avaliando-se individualmente a relação risco-benefício.


OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to systematically review the supporting evidence for the use of antipsychotics in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with dementia, as well as the controversies and limitations of this prescription. We discuss the available evidence in the light of the high prevalence of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in this population, along with the greater susceptibility of elderly patients to adverse events. METHOD: Systematic literature review of the use of typical and atypical antipsychotics in patients with dementia was carried out in the databases PubMed/Medline, Embase and SciELO. The search was limited to clinical trials and meta-analysis of the literature published from 1986 to 2007. RESULTS: Evidence drawn from randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials support the use of both typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of behavioral symptoms of dementia, especially psychotic symptoms and abnormal psychomotor activity. Nevertheless, the use of these drugs in demented patients is not devoid of important adverse events. Although the induction of extrapiramidal symptoms is not as frequent or severe with atypical antipsychotics as it is with first-generation neuroleptics, the former drugs may particularly increase the risk of cerebrovascular events and death. CONCLUSION: Although effective, antipsychotic drugs must be prescribed cautiously in patients with dementia. Dose regimens, duration of treatment and a cautious assessment of risk-benefit must be established for each patient.


Assuntos
Humanos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/complicações , Demência Vascular/tratamento farmacológico , Demência/psicologia , Dibenzotiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Haloperidol/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 38(9): 1303-1311, Sept. 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-408371

RESUMO

Sildenafil citrate is a drug commonly used to manage erectile dysfunction. It is designated chemically as 1-[[3-(6,7-dihydro-1-methyl-7-oxo-3-propyl-1H -pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)-4 ethoxyphenyl] sulfonyl]-4-methylpiperazine citrate (C22H30N6O4 S). It is a highly selective inhibitor of cyclic guanine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase type 5. In late March through mid-November 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a report on 130 confirmed deaths among men (mean age, 64 years) who received prescriptions for sildenafil citrate, a period during which >6 million outpatient prescriptions (representing about 50 million tablets) were dispensed. The US FDA recently reported that significant cardiovascular events, including sudden cardiac death, have occurred in men with erectile dysfunction who were taking sildenafil citrate. These reports have raised concerns that sildenafil citrate may increase the risk of cardiovascular events, particularly fatal arrhythmias, in patients with cardiovascular disease. In the past few years, the cardiac electrophysiological effects of sildenafil citrate have been investigated extensively in both animal and clinical studies. According to extensive data available to date, sildenafil citrate has been shown to pose minimal cardiovascular risks to healthy people taking this drug. Some precautions are needed for patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, the only absolute contraindication for sildenafil citrate is the concurrent use of nitrates. This article is intended to review sildenafil citrate's cardiovascular effects, as well as current debates about its arrhythmogenic effects.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/farmacologia , Piperazinas/farmacologia , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Eletrofisiologia , Disfunção Erétil/complicações , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Contração Miocárdica/efeitos dos fármacos , Purinas , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Sulfonas , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 31(4): 342-355, July-Aug. 2005. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-412893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sildenafil among Brazilian patients with hypertension treated with combinations of anti-hypertensive drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty hypertensive men aged 30 to 81 years old under treatment with 2 or more anti-hypertensive drugs and with erectile dysfunction (ED) lasting for at least 6 months were enrolled at 7 research centers in Brazil. Patients were randomized to receive treatment with either sildenafil or placebo taken 1 hour before sexual intercourse (initial dose of 50 mg, adjusted to 25 mg or 100 mg according to efficacy and toxicity). During the following 8 weeks, patients were evaluated regarding vital signs, adverse events, therapeutic efficacy, satisfaction with treatment and use of concurrent medications. RESULTS: The primary evaluation of efficacy, which was based on responses to questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function, showed significant differences regarding treatment with sildenafil (p = 0.0002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In the assessment of global efficacy, 87 percent of the patients treated with sildenafil reported improved erections, as compared with 37 percent of patients given placebos (p < 0.0001). The other secondary evaluations supported the results favoring sildenafil. The most frequent adverse events among patients treated with sildenafil were headaches (11.4 percent), vasodilation (11.4 percent) and dyspepsia (6.5 percent). There were no significant changes in blood pressure measurements in both groups. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is efficacious and safe for the treatment of hypertensive patients with ED who receive concurrent combinations of anti-hypertensive drugs.


Assuntos
Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Quimioterapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Hipertensão/complicações , Disfunção Erétil/complicações , Satisfação do Paciente , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA