Soporte ventilatorio no invasivo como puente hacia el trasplante pulmonar: reporte de un caso / Bridging to lung transplant using noninvasive ventilatory support: a case report

El soporte ventilatorio no invasivo es una herramienta que ha demostrado mejorar la sobrevida de pacientes con falla muscular de la bomba respiratoria y el manejo de enfermedades pulmonares crónicas, incluso la ventilación no invasiva nocturna ha servido de puente hacia el trasplante pulmonar. Se presenta el caso de una adolescente de 14 años con enfermedad pulmonar crónica hipoxémica severa y falla ventilatoria secundaria, que requirió ventilación prolongada y traqueostomía en espera de trasplante pulmonar. Luego de reevaluar indemnidad de la vía aérea fue decanulada a soporte ventilatorio no invasivo, con uso alternado de mascarilla nasal nocturna y pieza bucal diurna, permitiendo descanso muscular respiratorio eficiente, y mejoría de flujo de tos con técnicas de apilamiento de aire. Este plan permitió una decanulación segura y realizar soporte continuo ventilatorio no invasivo con un programa de rehabilitación cardiorrespiratorio. Generalmente, el soporte ventilatorio no invasivo se utiliza en trastornos primarios de la bomba respiratoria. En este caso, se indicó para enfermedad pulmonar crónica hipoxémica, mostrando claros beneficios con oxigenación adecuada, buen rendimiento cardiovascular con mejor tolerancia al ejercicio y entrenamiento en el escenario de preparación al trasplante pulmonar.

Noninvasive Ventilatory Support has demonstrated to improve survival of patients with ventilatory pump muscle failure and nocturnal noninvasive ventilation is useful in chronic lung disease, even bridging to lung transplant. We present a 14 years old girl with severe hypoxemic chronic lung disease and secondary ventilatory failure, who required continuous long-term ventilation and underwent a tracheostomy waiting for lung transplant. After reevaluated the airway patency the patient was decannulated to Noninvasive Ventilation Support, alternating nocturnal nasal mask with diurnal mouth piece in order to provide efficient respiratory muscle rest, made air stacking and improved cough flow. This plan allows safe decannulation to continuous Noninvasive Ventilatory Support tailoring a rehabilitation cardiorespiratory program. Usually, Noninvasive Ventilation Support is prescribed for primary respiratory pump muscles failure, but in this case, it was applied for a hypoxemic chronic lung disease. Clear benefits were observed leading to appropriate oxygenation, good cardiovascular performance with better tolerance to exercise for training in the preparatory scenario of a lung transplant.

Intraocular lens explantation or exchange: indications, postoperative interventions, and outcomes / Remoção ou troca de lentes intraoculares: indicações, intervenções pós-operatórias e resultados

ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze the indications for explantation or exchange of intraocular lenses (IOLs), which were originally implanted for the correction of aphakia during cataract extraction. Methods: All cases that involved intraocular lens explantation or exchange in one institution between January 2008 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: In total, 93 eyes of 93 patients were analyzed. The median time interval between implantation and explantation of the anterior chamber intraocular lenses (AC IOL) and posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOL) was 83.40 ± 83.14 months (range: 1-276 months) and 55.14 ± 39.25 months (range: 1-168 months), respectively. Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (17 eyes, 38.6%) and persistent iritis (12 eyes, 27.8%) in the AC IOL group and dislocation or decentration (30 eyes, 61.2%) and incorrect IOL power (nine eyes, 18.4%) in the PC IOL group were the most common indications for explantation of IOLs. The mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 1.30 preoperatively to 0.62 postoperatively in the PC IOL group (p<0.001) but did not improve significantly in the AC IOL group (p=0.186). Conclusions: The primary indication for IOL explantation or exchange was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in the AC IOL group and was dislocation or decentration in the PC IOL group. PC IOL explantation or exchange is safe and improves visual acuity. .

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar as indicações para a remoção ou troca de lentes intraoculares (IOL), que foram originalmente implantadas para a correção de afacia após a extração da catarata. Método: Todos os casos que envolveram remoção ou troca de lentes intraoculares em uma única instituição, entre janeiro de 2008 e dezembro 2014 foram analisados retrospectivamente. Resultados: No total, foram analisados 93 olhos de 93 pacientes. O intervalo de tempo médio entre o implante e a remoção das LIOs de câmara anterior (AC IOL) e de câmara posterior (PC IOL) foi 83,40 ± 83,14 meses (variando de 1 a 276 meses) e 55,14 ± 39,25 meses (variando de 1 a 168 meses), respectivamente. Ceratopatia bolhosa pseudofácica (17 olhos, 38,6%) e irite persistente (12 olhos, 27,8%) no grupo AC IOL, e deslocamento ou descentralização (30 olhos, 61,2%) e poder incorreto da IOL (nove olhos, 18,4%), no grupo PC IOL, foram as indicações mais comuns para a remoção das IOLs. A média logMAR da melhor acuidade visual corrigida (BCVA) melhorou significativamente a partir de 1,30 no pré-operatório para 0,62 no pós-operatório no grupo PC IOL (p<0,001), mas não melhorou significativamente no grupo AC IOL (p=0,186). Conclusões: A principal indicação para remoção ou troca de lentes intraoculares foi a ceratopatia bolhosa pesudofácica no grupo AC IOL e deslocamento ou descentralização no grupo PC IOL. A remoção ou troca de PC IOLs é segura e melhora a acuidade visual. .

Early removal of nasogastric tube is beneficial for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion

PURPOSE: Examine the beneficial effect of early nasogastric tube (NGT) removal in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 43 consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion and were randomized into 2 groups. In the intervention group (n = 22), the NGT was removed 12 hours after the operation. Comparatively, in the control group (n = 21), the NGT remained in place until the appearance of the first flatus. The appearance of ileus, patient ambulation, time to regular diet, and hospital discharge of the two patient groups were assessed. Patient discomfort due to the NGT was also recorded. RESULTS: The 2 groups showed statistical homogeneity of their baseline characteristics. Two patients (9.09 percent) from the intervention and 3 patients (14.3 percent) from the control group developed postoperative ileus and were treated conservatively. No significant differences in intraoperative, postoperative, bowel outcomes or other complications were found between the two groups. All patients preferred the NGT to be removed first in comparison to their other co-existing drains. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized, prospective study, to our knowledge, to assess early NGT removal after radical cystectomy. We advocate early removal, independently of the selected type of urinary diversion, since it is not correlated with ileus and is advantageous in terms of patient comfort and earlier ambulation.