Retraso del desarrollo del lenguaje en niños de 24 meses en un centro de salud en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires / Language development delay in 24-month-old children at a health care center of the City of Buenos Aires

Introducción. El retraso del desarrollo del lenguaje representa un desafío frecuente para pediatras y otros profesionales. El objetivo principal fue establecer su prevalencia en niñas y niños usuarios de un centro de salud. Población y métodos. Se evaluó el vocabulario expresivo de niñas y niños de 24 meses en un centro de salud utilizando el Inventario de Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas MacArthur-Bates, versión breve (adaptación argentina). Se investigó la asociación entre el retraso del lenguaje y las características demográficas, socioeconómicas, conductuales/emocionales y de estrés parental. En aquellos con retraso expresivo, se evaluó el vocabulario receptivo y se investigaron posibles causas subyacentes (retraso cognitivo no verbal, trastornos del espectro autista, patología del oído medio e hipoacusia). Resultados. Se observó un retraso del desarrollo del lenguaje en 16 de 138 participantes (11,6%; intervalo de confianza -IC- 95%: 6,2-17%), asociado significativamente con antecedentes familiares de retraso del lenguaje, estrés parental y comportamiento problemático. El compromiso del vocabulario receptivo se identificó en 13 de 16 casos con retraso del desarrollo del lenguaje, y 7 presentaron sospecha de trastorno del espectro autista, de retraso global del desarrollo o ambas. Se observó la patología del oído medio en 5 de 9 estudiados. Los 9 participantes a los que se realizó una audiometría no presentaron resultados patológicos de acuerdo con los criterios adoptados en el presente trabajo. Conclusiones. El retraso del desarrollo del lenguaje representa un problema prevalente en nuestra población y se asoció principalmente con problemas de comportamiento y antecedentes familiares de retraso del lenguaje.

Introduction. Language development delay is a frequent challenge for pediatricians and other health care providers. The main objective of this study was to establish its prevalence among children attending a health care center. Population and methods. The expressive vocabulary of 24-month-old children attending a health care center was assessed using the Spanish-language MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, short form (Argentine version). The association between language delay and demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral/emotional, and parental stress characteristics was analyzed. In children with expressive language delay, receptive vocabulary was assessed and possible underlying causes were studied (non-verbal cognitive delay, autistic spectrum disorders, middle ear pathology, and hearing impairment). Results. Language development delay was observed in 16 out of 138 participants (11.6%; 95% confidence interval: 6.2-17%), significantly associated with a family history of language delay, parental stress, and problem behavior. Receptive vocabulary compromise was identified in 13 out of 16 children with language development delay, and 7 were suspected of autistic spectrum disorder, overall developmental delay, or both. A middle ear pathology was observed in 5 out of 9 studied children. The 9 participants who had an audiometry did not have pathological results based on this study's criteria. Conclusions. Language development delay is a prevalent condition in our population and has been mainly associated with behavioral problems and a family history of language delay.

Masking Level Difference em escolares: análises ambientais / Masking Level Difference in schoolchildren: environmental analysis

RESUMO Objetivo Pesquisar a habilidade auditiva de atenção seletiva na população escolar e identificar valores de referência para a faixa etária de sete a dez anos por meio do teste Masking Level Difference, além de identificar se a escolaridade dos pais, bem como a renda familiar, pode influenciar os resultados do teste. Método Participaram do estudo 31 escolares que se encaixaram nos critérios de elegibilidade da pesquisa, sendo 20 do gênero feminino e 11 do gênero masculino. Realizou-se anamnese para questionamento da renda familiar e escolaridade dos pais do escolar, inspeção visual do meato acústico externo, audiometria tonal liminar, logoaudiometria, medidas de imitância acústica, teste Dicótico de Dígitos e teste Masking Level Difference. Resultados A idade média dos indivíduos foi de 8,67 anos. Não foi observada diferença entre os gêneros e entre as idades avaliadas, no desempenho do MLD. Não houve relação entre a escolaridade dos pais e a renda mensal média com o desempenho das crianças no MLD. A média do MLD foi de 7,65 dB, com desvio padrão de 2,51 dB. Conclusão O Masking Level Difference em escolares de sete a dez anos é de 7,65 dB e independe do gênero, do nível de escolaridade dos pais ou da renda mensal média da família do escolar.

ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate the auditory ability of selective attention in the school population and to identify reference values to the age group from seven to ten years old through the Masking Level Difference Test, and to identify if the parents' schooling, as well as the family income can influence the test results. Methods Thirty-one schoolchildren who match the eligibility criteria attended the study, being 20 female and 11 male. An anamnesis was conducted to question the familiar income and the schooling of the children´s parents; we also performed visual inspection of the External Acoustic Meatus, Pure Tone Audiometry, Speech Audiometry, Acoustic Immittance Measures, Dichotic Digits Test and Masking Level Difference test. Results The mean age of the individuals was 8.67 years. There were no observed differences between genders and between the evaluated ages in the MLD performance. There was no relation between the parents' schooling and the average monthly income with the performance of the children in MLD Test. The MLD mean was 7.65 dB and standard deviation of 2.51 dB. Conclusion The Masking Level Difference in schoolchildren from seven to ten years old is 7.65 dB and is independent of the gender, parents' schooling and the average monthly income of the schoolchild.

Impacto do distúrbio específico de linguagem e do tipo de escola nos diferentes subsistemas da linguagem / Impact of specific language impairment and type of school on different language subsystems

RESUMO Objetivo Este estudo teve o objetivo de explorar os efeitos do tipo de escola e do distúrbio específico de linguagem (DEL) sobre diferentes habilidades de linguagem, tanto do ponto de vista quantitativo quanto qualitativo. Método 204 crianças brasileiras de 4 a 6 anos participaram da pesquisa. As crianças foram recrutadas para formar três grupos: 1) 63 crianças em desenvolvimento típico de linguagem, estudantes de escola particular (DTPar); 2) 102 crianças em desenvolvimento típico de linguagem, estudantes de escola pública (DTPub); e 39 crianças com diagnóstico de DEL, estudantes de escola pública (DELPub). Todas as crianças foram avaliadas em provas de vocabulário expressivo, morfologia de número e compreensão morfossintática. Resultados Todos os subsistemas da linguagem foram susceptíveis tanto a questões ambientais (efeito tipo de escola) quanto orgânicas (efeito DEL). As relações entre as medidas de linguagem foram exatamente as mesmas para todos os grupos, indicando que o aumento do vocabulário ocorreu em função da idade, e se mostrou associado ao desenvolvimento das habilidades morfológicas e de compreensão morfossintática. As crianças com DEL apresentaram erros atípicos na prova de compreensão aos 4 anos, mas passaram a apresentar um padrão de erros semelhante ao do desenvolvimento típico com o aumento da idade. Conclusão O efeito tipo de escola foi marcado por diferenças quantitativas, enquanto o efeito DEL foi marcado por diferenças predominantemente quantitativas, mas também qualitativas.

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to explore quantitative and qualitative effects of type of school and specific language impairment (SLI) on different language abilities. Methods 204 Brazilian children aged from 4 to 6 years old participated in the study. Children were selected to form three groups: 1) 63 typically developing children studying in private schools (TDPri); 2) 102 typically developing children studying in state schools (TDSta); and 39 children with SLI studying in state schools (SLISta). All individuals were assessed regarding expressive vocabulary, number morphology and morphosyntactic comprehension. Results All language subsystems were vulnerable to both environmental (type of school) and biological (SLI) effects. The relationship between the three language measures was exactly the same to all groups: vocabulary growth correlated with age and with the development of morphological abilities and morphosyntactic comprehension. Children with SLI showed atypical errors in the comprehension test at the age of 4, but presented a pattern of errors that gradually resembled typical development. Conclusion The effect of type of school was marked by quantitative differences, while the effect of SLI was characterised by both quantitative and qualitative differences.

Dificultades de lenguaje en preescolares: concordancia entre el test TEPSI y la evaluación fonoaudiológica / Language difficulties in pre-scholars: concordance between TEPSI test and speech therapist evaluation

Background: Language deficits cause difficulties in the family, school and social settings, so early detection and intervention are crucial. In Primary Care, children undergo developmental screening using the TEPSI test, which includes language at 4 years-old. Objective: Establish the frequency of language delay in children at pre-school, determined by specific language tests, in order to establish their concordance with TEPSI test. Method: Children between 3 and 5 years-old, attending 2 low-income pre-school facilities from the North Metropolitan Area, were evaluated during 2006. The information was obtained in a blind and simultaneous mode through TEPSI test performed by nurses and 3 specific language tests performed by speech therapists. A performance < p10 or < 2SD in one or was more language tests was considered a deficit. The concordance and discordance between both evaluations were established. Results: From a total of 219 children, 194 (89 percent) completed the evaluation. 48 percent had a language deficit by speech evaluation and 13,9 percent by TEPSI test. The concordance between both evaluations was poor (Kappa 0,2), with a significant discordance (p < 0,0000) by Mc NemarÆs X². Conclusion: The frequency of language problems in this population is high; a poor concordance between the tests used in Primary Care and language evaluations performed by speech therapists was found. The differences could be caused by the different aspects of language being evaluated. The findings lead to reconsider the screening strategies used in Primary Care and to implement language stimulation programs directed to low-income populations at high risk for language deficits.

Introducción: Los déficit del lenguaje conllevan dificultades en el contexto familiar, escolar y social, siendo fundamental la pesquisa e intervención precoz. En la atención primaria (APS) el lenguaje se evalúa en el marco del desarrollo psicomotor (DSM), a los 4 años mediante el test de TEPSI. Objetivo: Describir la frecuencia de déficit de lenguaje en preescolares asistentes a jardín infantil según pruebas de lenguaje específicas y establecer la concordancia entre estas pruebas y el TEPSI. Metodología: Se evaluó a todos los niños entre 3 y 5 años, asistentes a dos jardines infantiles de nivel socioeconómico bajo, del área Norte de la Región Metropolitana. La información se obtuvo en forma simultánea y ciega mediante la aplicación del TEPSI por enfermeras y la evaluación del lenguaje con dos pruebas específicas aplicadas por fonoaudiólogos. Se consideró un desempeño deficitario cuando el rendimiento en una o más pruebas de lenguaje fue < p10 ó < 2DS para la edad. Se estableció la concordancia y discordancia entre ambas evaluaciones. Resultados: De un total de 219 niños, 194 (89 por ciento) completaron la evaluación con los instrumentos señalados. 48,8 por ciento presentó dificultades del lenguaje según la evaluación fonoaudiológica y 13,9 por ciento según TEPSI. La concordancia entre ambas evaluaciones fue pobre (Kappa 0,2), con una discordancia altamente significativa p < 0,0000 según X² de Mc Nemar. Conclusión: Destaca la alta frecuencia de problemas de lenguaje en la población estudiada y la pobre concordancia entre las pruebas aplicadas en APS y la evaluación fonoaudiológica. Las diferencias podrían deberse a los distintos aspectos del lenguaje considerados en las evaluaciones. Los hallazgos invitan a replantear las estrategias de pesquisa utilizadas en APS y a la implementación de programas integrales de estimulación en poblaciones desfavorecidas, consideradas de riesgo para problemas de lenguaje.