The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS).

PURPOSE: The classification of trauma patients in emergency settings is a constant challenge for physicians. However, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used in developed countries, it may be difficult to perform it in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). As a result, the ISS was calculated using an estimated methodology that has been described and validated in a high-income country previously. In addition, a simple scoring tool called the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) was developed recently. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of KTS and estimated ISS (eISS) in order to achieve a valid and efficient scoring system in our resource-limited setting. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study between December 2020 and March 2021 among the multi-trauma patients who presented at the emergency department of Imam Reza hospital, Tabriz, Iran. After obtaining informed consent, all data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, GCS, KTS, eISS, final outcome (including death, morbidity, or discharge), and length of hospital stay were collected and entered into SPSS version 27.0 and analyzed. RESULTS: 381 multi-trauma patients participated in the study. The area under the curve for prediction of mortality (AUC) for KTS was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.888-0.958) and for eISS was 0.910 (95% CI: 0.877-0.944). For the mortality, comparing the AUCs by the Delong test, the difference between areas was not statistically significant (p value = 0.356). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the prediction of mortality KTS and eISS were 28.27 and 32.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our study population, the KTS has similar accuracy in predicting the mortality of multi-trauma patients compared to the eISS.

[Risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality after conversion of osteosynthesis in patients with polytrauma]. / Opredelenie riskov posleoperatsionnykh oslozhnenii i letal'nogo iskhoda posle konversionnogo osteosinteza u patsientov s politravmoi.

OBJECTIVE: To reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality after conversion of external fixation device into various types of submerged osteosynthesis in patients with polytrauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective and prospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 351 patients with polytrauma was divided into 2 stages. At the first stage, we analyzed significant predictors of complications after conversion of osteosynthesis in the 1st group (retrospective analysis). At the second stage, we estimated the efficacy of the developed scale for assessing the risk of complications after conversion of osteosynthesis in a prospective group of patients. RESULTS: According to the complication risk assessment scale for conversion of osteosynthesis, analysis of time to surgical treatment depending on objective criteria in patients with polytrauma can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications by 14% and mortality rate by 1.7%. CONCLUSION: The complication risk assessment scale after conversion of osteosynthesis will personalize the approach to timing and methods of conversion. This measure will eliminate the «second hit¼ in damage control orthopedics and improve the results of treatment.

Modifiability of surgical timing in postinjury multiple organ failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) is the leading cause of late trauma deaths, with primarily non-modifiable risk factors. Timing of surgery as a potentially modifiable risk factor is frequently proposed, but has not been quantified. We aimed to compare mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS between MOF patients who had surgery that preceded MOF with modifiable timings versus those with non-modifiable timings. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of an ongoing 17-year prospective cohort study of ICU polytrauma patients at-risk of MOF. Among MOF patients (Denver score>3), we identified patients who had surgery that preceded MOF, determined whether the timing of these operation(s) were modifiable(M) or non-modifiable (non-M), and evaluated the change in physiological parameters as a result of surgery. RESULTS: Of 716 polytrauma patients at-risk of MOF, 205/716 (29%) developed MOF, and 161/205 (79%) had surgery during their ICU admission. Of the surgical MOF patients, 147/161 (91%) had one or more operation(s) that preceded MOF, and 65/161 (40%) of them had operation(s) with modifiable timings. There were no differences in age (mean (SD) 52 (19) vs 53 (21)years), injury severity score (median (IQR) 34 (26-41)vs34 (25-44)), admission physiological and resuscitation parameters, between M and non-M-patients. M patients had longer ICU LOS (median (IQR) 18 (12-28)versus 11 (8-16)days, p < 0.0001) than non-M-patients, without difference in mortality (14%vs16%, p = 0.7347), or hospital LOS (median (IQR) 32 (18-52)vs27 (17-47)days, p = 0.3418). M-patients had less fluids and transfusions intraoperatively. Surgery did not compromise patient physiology. CONCLUSION: Operations preceding MOF are common in polytrauma and seem to be safe in maintaining physiology. The margin for improvement from optimizing surgical timing is modest, contrary to historical assumptions.

Effect of access to the integrated treatment model for patients with multiple severe injuries in the Chinese population.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to enhance the effectiveness of an integrated treatment model for patients with severe multiple injuries in China. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 110 patients with multiple severe injuries. These patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment model they received. The first group, called the MDTM group, received the integrated treatment model, which involved a multidisciplinary team-based approach. The second group, designated the TSM group, received the traditional specialist-based treatment model. The primary outcome measure was the survival rate of patients after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the time spent on hospital emergency treatment, the length of hospital stay, the mortality rate, and family satisfaction. RESULTS: The survival rate of patients after treatment in the MDTM group (83.93%) was significantly greater than that in the TSM group (70.37%). Consequently, the mortality of patients after treatment in the MDTM group (16.07%) was significantly lower than that in the TSM group (29.63%). Furthermore, the MDTM group demonstrated significantly shorter durations of rescue efforts and shorter hospital stays. Additionally, family satisfaction was significantly greater in the MDTM group. CONCLUSION: The integrated treatment model shows potential for optimizing outcomes for patients with multiple severe injuries and generating higher levels of family satisfaction. This model holds practical applicability in the context of China and may help alleviate the strained relationship between physicians and patients.

"Blunt adrenal injury does not affect outcomes in the pediatric population with isolated abdominal injury- a National Trauma Data Bank Review®."

BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt abdominal injury (BAI) in the adult population has been estimated to be between 0.03% and 4.95%. However, the impact of BAI on the pediatric population remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of National Trauma Data Bank datasets for the years 2017-2019. We included patients under the age of 18 who experienced blunt trauma and had suffered a blunt abdominal injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity score of 2 or higher. RESULTS: Out of the 8064 pediatric patients with isolated abdominal trauma, 134 patients also suffered from BAI. We found no difference in the outcomes of patients with blunt adrenal injury in terms of mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and the number of ventilator days. Within poly-trauma patients BAI was associated with worst patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that BAI has minimal clinical impact on patient outcomes in isolation. However it is associated with worst outcomes in poly trauma patients suggesting correlation with increased trauma burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does the injury pattern drive the surgical treatment strategy in multiply injured patients with major fractures?

BACKGROUND: The timing of definitive surgery in multiple injured patients remains a topic of debate, and multiple concepts have been described. Although these included injury severity as a criterion to decide on the indications for surgery, none of them considered the influence of injury distributions. We analyzed whether injury distribution is associated with certain surgical strategies and related outcomes in a cohort of patients treated according to principles of early and safe fixation strategies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, multiple injured patients were included if they were primarily admitted to a Level I trauma center, had an Injury Severity Score of ≥16 points, and required surgical intervention for major injuries and fractures. The primary outcome measure was treatment strategy. The treatment strategy was classified according to the timing of definitive surgery after injury: early total care (ETC, <24 hours), safe definitive surgery (SDS, <48 hours), and damage control (DC, >48 hours). Statistics included univariate and multivariate analyses of mortality and the association of injury distributions and surgical tactics. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, 1,471 patients were included (mean ± SD age, 55.6 ± 20.4 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 23.1 ± 11.4). The group distribution was as follows: ETC, n = 85 (5.8%); SDS, n = 665 (45.2%); and DC, n = 721 (49.0%); mortality was 22.4% in ETC, 16.1% in SDS, and 39.7% in DC. Severe nonlethal abdominal injuries (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.5) and spinal injuries (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) were associated with ETC, while multiple extremity injuries were associated with SDS (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2). Severe traumatic brain injury was associated with DC (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). When a correction for the severity of head, abdominal, spinal, and extremity injuries, as well as differences in the values of admission pathophysiologic parameters were undertaken, the mortality was 30% lower in the SDS group when compared with the DC group (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4). CONCLUSION: Major spinal injuries and certain abdominal injuries, if identified as nonlethal, trigger definitive surgeries in the initial setting. In contrast, severe TBI was associated with delayed fracture care. Patients with major fractures and other injuries were treated by SDS (definitive care, <48 hours) when the pathophysiological response was adequate. The choice of a favorable surgical treatment appears to depend on injury patterns and physiological patient responses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Resultados del Registro Nacional de Politraumatismos español ¿Dónde estamos y a dónde nos dirigimos? / Results of the Spanish National Polytrauma Registry. Where are we and where are we heading?

Introducción: En 2017 se emprendió el Registro Nacional de Politraumatismos (RNP) a nivel estatal español, cuya finalidad residía en mejorar la calidad de la atención al paciente politraumatizado grave y evaluar el uso de recursos y estrategias de tratamiento. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar los datos recogidos en el RNP hasta la actualidad. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo a partir de los datos recogidos prospectivamente en el RNP. Se incluyen pacientes mayores de 14 años, con ISS≥15 o mecanismo de trauma penetrante, atendidos en 17 hospitales de tercer nivel de España. Resultados: Del 1/1/17 al 1/1/22 se han registrado un total de 2.069 pacientes politraumatizados. El 76,4% son varones; edad media: 45 años; ISS medio: 22,8 y mortalidad: 10,2%. El mecanismo de lesión más frecuente es el cerrado (80%) con mayor incidencia de accidentes de moto (23%). Un 12% de los pacientes sufren un traumatismo penetrante, por arma blanca en el 84%. Un 16% de los pacientes ingresa hemodinámicamente inestable en el hospital. Activando el protocolo de transfusión masiva en el 14% de los pacientes e interviniendo quirúrgicamente a un 53%. La estancia hospitalaria mediana es de 11 días. Precisando ingreso en la UCI un 73,4% (estancia media: 5 días). Conclusiones: Los pacientes politraumatizados registrados en el RNP son mayoritariamente varones de mediana edad, que sufren traumatismos cerrados y presentan una elevada incidencia de lesiones torácicas. La detección y el tratamiento dirigido de este tipo de lesiones probablemente permitirá mejorar la calidad asistencial del politraumatizado en nuestro medio. (AU)

Introduction: In 2017 the Spanish National Polytrauma Registry (SNPR) was initiated in Spain, its goal was to improve the quality of severe trauma management and evaluate the use of resources and treatment strategies. The objective of this study is to present the information obtained with the SNPR since it was initiated. Methods: Observational study with prospective data collection from the SNPR. Trauma patients included are older than 14 yeas, with ISS ≥ 15 or penetrating mechanism. In total 17 hospitals from Spain have participated. Results: From 1/1/17 to 1/1/22, 2069 trauma patients were registered. The majority were men (76.4%); mean age: 45 years; mean ISS: 22.8 and mortality: 10.2%. The most common mechanism of injury was blunt trauma (80%), being motorbike accident the most frequent (23%). Penetrating trauma is presented in 12% of patients, being stab wound the most common (84%). Sixteen percent of patients are hemodynamically unstable on hospital arrival. Massive transfusion protocol is activated in 14% of patients and 53% are operated. Median hospital stay is 11 days. There is a 73.4% of patients who need intensive care unit (ICU) admission, with a median ICU stay of 5 days. Conclusions: Trauma patients registered in the SNPR are predominantly middle-aged males who experience blunt trauma with a high incidence of thoracic injuries. Early and addressed detection of these kind of injuries would probably improve trauma quality of care in our environment. (AU)

Treatment management and outcome of polytraumatized patients in a German certified trauma center - comparing standard versus maximum care.

German hospitals are classified as basic, standard and maximum care facilities within the German trauma networks. The Municipal Hospital Dessau was upgraded in 2015 as a maximum care provider. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a change in treatment management and outcome of polytraumatized patients has occurred afterwards. The study compared polytraumatized patients, treated in the Dessau Municipal Clinic as a standard care facility (DessauStandard) from 2012-2014 vs. those treated in the Dessau Municipal Clinic as a maximum care facility (DessauMax) from 2016-2017. Data of the German Trauma Register were analysed using the chi-square test, t-test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.In DessauMax (238 patients; Ø 54 years, SD 22.3; ♂ 160, ♀ 78), the shock room time with 40.7 min (SD 21.4) was shorter than in DessauStandard (206 patients; Ø 56.1 years, SD 22.1; ♂ 133, ♀ 73 ) with 49 min (SD 25.1) (p=0.001). The transfer rate of 1.3% (n=3) to another hospital was lower in DessauMax (p=0.01). DessauStandard had 9 (4%) thromboembolic events and DessauMax 3 (1.3%) (p=0.7). Multiorgan failure was more common in DessauStandard, (16%) than in DessauMax (1.3%; p=0,001). DessauStandard showed a mortality of 13.1% (n=27), and DessauMax 9.2% (n=22) (p=0.22; OR=0.67, 95% CI, 0.37-1.23). The GOS in DessauMax (4.5, SD 1.2) was higher than in DessauStandard (4.1, SD 1.3) (p=0.002).The Dessau Municipal Clinic as a maximum care facility has achieved improved shock room time, fewer complications, lower mortality and an improved outcome.

Age-dependent thrombin generation predicts 30-day mortality and symptomatic thromboembolism after multiple trauma.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is a risk factor for death and is associated with deviations in thrombin generation. TIC prevalence and thrombin levels increase with age. We assayed in vivo and ex vivo thrombin generation in injured patients (n = 418) to specifically investigate how age impacts thrombin generation in trauma and to address the prognostic ability of thrombin generation. Biomarkers of thrombin generation were elevated in young (< 40 years) and older (≥ 40 years) trauma patients. In vivo thrombin generation was associated with Injury Severity Score (ISS) and this association was stronger in young than older patients. In vivo thrombin generation decreased faster after trauma in the young than the older patients. Across age groups, in vivo thrombin generation separated patients dying/surviving within 30 days at a level comparable to the ISS score (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.82, p > 0.76). In vivo and ex vivo thrombin generation also predicted development of thromboembolic events within the first 30 days after the trauma (AUC 0.70-0.84). In conclusion, younger trauma patients mount a stronger and more dynamic in vivo thrombin response than older patients. Across age groups, in vivo thrombin generation has a strong ability to predict death and/or thromboembolic events 30 days after injury.

Assistência de enfermagem ao paciente politraumatizado / Nursing assistance to the polytraumated patient / Asistencia de enfermería al paciente politraumado

Introdução: Politrauma é uma das maiores causas de mortalidade em pessoas adolescentes e adultos jovens, podendo levar a consequências e danos permanentes e gerar mudanças significativas na rotina pessoal, quando não ocorre o óbito. O cuidado de enfermagem é fundamental e importante a esses pacientes, a ser realizado por meio de conhecimentos específicos, visando auxiliar a qualidade assistencial. Objetivo: Descrever e destacar a importância da assistência de enfermagem a pacientes politraumatizados. Material e Método: Estudo de revisão de literatura, descritiva com abordagem qualitativa, sendo a coleta de dados realizada na base de dados BVS. Resultados: Os 8 artigos selecionados foram submetidos a Análise Temática de Conteúdo, sendo trabalhadas duas categorias temáticas: Assistência de enfermagem ao paciente politraumatizado e, Processo de enfermagem na assistência a politraumatizados. Identificou-se que o cuidado assistencial de enfermagem a esses pacientes é essencial, devendo ser prestado de maneira ágil, eficaz e segura, exigindo, portanto, treinamento e capacitação prévia do enfermeiro para identificar junto a equipe, lesões existentes, garantir a estabilização no menor tempo possível e manter a sobrevida, durante o atendimento pré-hospitalar e posteriormente no ambiente hospitalar. O processo de enfermagem inclui avaliação primária no atendimento, seguida pela secundária e as fases do processo de enfermagem devem ser asseguradas contemplando os objetivos propostos, durante todo o tratamento. Conclusão: A assistência a pacientes politraumatizados deve ser desenvolvida por meio de protocolos específicos, ordenados sequencialmente, buscando-se como medida, determinar a responsividade do indivíduo. A temática é significativa, complexa e requer novos estudos e atualizações. (AU)

Introduction: Polytrauma is one of the major causes of mortality in adolescents and young adults, and can lead to permanent consequences and damage and generate significant changes in personal routine, when death does not occur. Nursing care is fundamental and important for these patients, to be carried out through specific knowledge, aiming to help the quality of care. Objective: To describe and highlight the importance of nursing care for polytraumatized patients. Material and Method: A descriptive literature review study with a qualitative approach, with data collection carried out in the VHL database. Results: The 8 selected articles were submitted to Thematic Content Analysis, with two thematic categories being worked on: Nursing care for the polytraumatized patient and, Nursing process in the care of polytraumatized patients. It was identified that nursing care care for these patients is essential, and must be provided in an agile, effective and safe way, therefore requiring training and prior qualification of nurses to identify existing injuries with the team, ensure stabilization in the smallest possible time and maintain survival, during pre-hospital care and later in the hospital environment. The nursing process includes primary assessment in care, followed by secondary and the phases of the nursing process must be ensured, considering the proposed objectives, throughout the treatment. Conclusion: Assistance to polytraumatized patients must be developed through specific protocols, ordered sequentially, seeking as a measure, to determine the individual's responsiveness. The theme is significant, complex and requires further studies and updates.(AU)

Introducción: El politraumatismo es una de las principales causas de mortalidad en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes, pudiendo tener secuelas y daños permanentes y generar cambios significativos en la rutina personal, cuando la muerte no se presenta. El cuidado de enfermería es fundamental e importante para estos pacientes, siendo realizado a través de conocimientos específicos, con el objetivo de ayudar y mejorar la calidad del cuidado. Objetivo: Describir y resaltar la importancia del cuidado de enfermería al paciente politraumatizado. Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo de revisión bibliográfica con abordaje cualitativo, con recolección de datos realizada en la base de datos de la BVS. Resultados: Los 8 artículos seleccionados fueron sometidos al Análisis de Contenido Temático, siendo trabajadas dos categorías temáticas: Atención de Enfermería al politraumatizado y Proceso de Enfermería en el cuidado al politraumatizado. Se identificó que el cuidado de enfermería a estos pacientes es fundamental, y debe ser brindado de forma ágil, eficaz y segura, por lo que se requiere de capacitación y calificación previa de los enfermeros para identificar las lesiones existentes con el equipo, garantizar la estabilización en los más pequeños en tanto posible...(AU)

Factors Associated With Increased Mortality in Severe Abdominopelvic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Associated injuries are thought to increase mortality in patients with severe abdominopelvic trauma. This study aimed to identify clinical factors contributing to increased mortality in patients with severe abdominopelvic trauma, with the hypothesis that a greater number of concomitant injuries would result in increased mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of patients ≥ 18 years with severe abdominopelvic trauma defined as having an abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥ 3 with pelvic fractures and/or iliac vessel injury (2015-2017). Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality based on concomitant body region injuries. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 6 h, 6 to 24 h, and after 24 h based on concomitant injuries, procedures performed, and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: A total of 185,257 patients were included in this study. Survivors had more severely injured body regions than non-survivors (4 vs. 3, P < 0.001). Among those who died within 6 h, 28.5% of patients required a thoracic procedure and 43% required laparotomy compared to 6.3% and 22.1% among those who died after 24 h (P < 0.001). Head AIS ≥ 3 was the only body region that significantly contributed to overall mortality (OR 1.26, P < 0.001) along with laparotomy (OR 3.02, P < 0.001), neurosurgical procedures (2.82, P < 0.001) and thoracic procedures (2.28, P < 0.001). Non-survivors who died in < 6 h and 6-24 h had greater pRBC requirements than those who died after 24 h (15.5 and 19.5 vs. 8 units, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased number of body regions injured does not contribute to greater mortality. Uncontrolled noncompressible torso hemorrhage rather than the burden of concomitant injuries is the major contributor to the high mortality associated with severe abdominopelvic injury.

Incidence, causes and consequences of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury as determined by Abbreviated Injury Score in the Netherlands.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. Epidemiology seems to be changing. TBIs are increasingly caused by falls amongst elderly, whilst we see less polytrauma due to road traffic accidents (RTA). Data on epidemiology is essential to target prevention strategies. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted. The Dutch National Trauma Database was used to identify all patients over 17 years old who were admitted to a hospital with moderate and severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3) in the Netherlands from January 2015 until December 2017. Subgroup analyses were done for the elderly and polytrauma patients. 12,295 patients were included in this study. The incidence of moderate and severe TBI was 30/100.000 person-years, 13% of whom died. Median age was 65 years and falls were the most common trauma mechanism, followed by RTAs. Amongst elderly, RTAs consisted mostly of bicycle accidents. Mortality rates were higher for elderly (18%) and polytrauma patients (24%). In this national database more elderly patients who most often sustained the injury due to a fall or an RTA were seen. Bicycle accidents were very frequent, suggesting prevention could be an important aspect in order to decrease morbidity and mortality.

Incidence and Nature of Lower-Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Polytrauma on Thromboprophylaxis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common among the severely injured and may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE), which can be life threatening. Thromboprophylaxis may reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE); it does not guarantee complete protection. This study's primary aim was to determine the incidence and nature of lower-limb DVT in polytrauma patients taking prophylaxis. The secondary objective was to assess the incidence of DVT-related complications, including the development of PE and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients age 18 years or older who presented with polytrauma directly from the scene and were admitted into the trauma unit between March 1, 2020 and August 31, 2020. All patients underwent lower-limb ultrasound during their hospital course to diagnose DVT. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients underwent extremity Doppler ultrasound to detect DVT. Of these, 69 patients (40.8%) were considered at the highest-risk for VTE development. For VTE prophylaxis, 115 patients (68%) received pharmacologic agents, and 54 patients (32%) had intermittent pneumatic compression on admission. Three patients (1.8%) developed DVT despite prophylaxis. Four patients (2.4%) developed PE during the index presentation and were diagnosed between days 3 and 13 after injury. Early DVT was not detected in any patients with diagnosed PE. Overall, nine patients (5.33%) died, but no in-hospital deaths were related to DVT and/or PE. CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT in polytrauma patients remains low in our small series, perhaps because of the mandatory VTE risk assessment for all hospitalized patients and the early initiation of prophylaxis. Using a trauma center registry to measure DVT and PE incidence regularly is recommended to improve trauma care quality.

Comparison of base excess, lactate and pH predicting 72-h mortality of multiple trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive values of base excess (BE), lactate and pH of admission arterial blood gas for 72-h mortality in patients with multiple trauma. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis based on a publicly shared trauma dataset from the Dryad database, which provided the clinical data of 3669 multiple trauma patients with ISS > = 16. The records of BE, lactate, pH and 72-h prognosis data without missing values were selected from this dataset and 2441 individuals were enrolled in the study. Logistic regression model was performed to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) of variables. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating curve (ROC) was utilized to evaluate the predictive value of predictors for 72 h in-hospital mortality. Pairwise comparison of AUCs was performed using the Delong's test. RESULTS: The statistically significant correlations were observed between BE and lactate (r = - 0.5861, p < 0.05), lactate and pH (r = - 0.5039, p < 0.05), and BE and pH (r = - 0.7433, p < 0.05). The adjusted ORs of BE, lactate and pH for 72-h mortality with the adjustment for factors including gender, age, ISS category were 0.872 (95%CI: 0.854-0.890), 1.353 (95%CI: 1.296-1.413) and 0.007 (95%CI: 0.003-0.016), respectively. The AUCs of BE, lactate and pH were 0.693 (95%CI: 0.675-0.712), 0.715 (95%CI: 0.697-0.733), 0.670 (95%CI: 0.651-0.689), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant correlations between BE, lactate and pH of the admission blood gas, all of them are independent predictors of 72-h mortality for multiple trauma. Lactate may have the best predictive value, followed by BE, and finally pH.

Prehospital time and mortality in polytrauma patients: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The time from injury to treatment is considered as one of the major determinants for patient outcome after trauma. Previous studies already attempted to investigate the correlation between prehospital time and trauma patient outcome. However, the outcome for severely injured patients is not clear yet, as little data is available from prehospital systems with both Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). Therefore, the aim was to investigate the association between prehospital time and mortality in polytrauma patients in a Dutch level I trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using data derived from the Dutch trauma registry of the National Network for Acute Care from Amsterdam UMC location VUmc over a 2-year period. Severely injured polytrauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16), who were treated on-scene by EMS or both EMS and HEMS and transported to our level I trauma center, were included. Patient characteristics, prehospital time, comorbidity, mechanism of injury, type of injury, HEMS assistance, prehospital Glasgow Coma Score and ISS were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. The outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In total, 342 polytrauma patients were included in the analysis. The total mortality rate was 25.7% (n = 88). Similar mean prehospital times were found between the surviving and non-surviving patient groups, 45.3 min (SD 14.4) and 44.9 min (SD 13.2) respectively (p = 0.819). The confounder-adjusted analysis revealed no significant association between prehospital time and mortality (p = 0.156). CONCLUSION: This analysis found no association between prehospital time and mortality in polytrauma patients. Future research is recommended to explore factors of influence on prehospital time and mortality.

30-day and 1-year mortality after skeletal fractures: a register study of 295,713 fractures at different locations.

Background and purpose - Few studies have reported the mortality rate after skeletal fractures involving different locations, within the same population. We analyzed the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates following different fractures.Patients and methods - We included 295,713 fractures encountered in patients 16-108 years of age, registered in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) from 2012 to 2018. Mortality rates were obtained by linkage of the SFR to the Swedish Tax Agency population register. The standardized mortality ratios (SMR) at 30 days and 1 year were calculated for fractures in any location and for each of 27 fracture locations, using age- and sex-life tables from Statistics Sweden (www.scb.se).Results - The overall SMR at 30 days was 6.8 (95% CI 6.7-7.0) and at 1 year 2.2 (CI 2.2-2.2). The SMR was > 2 for 19/27 and 13/27 of the fracture locations at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. Humerus, femur, and tibial diaphysis fractures were all associated with high SMR, at both 30 days and 1 year.Interpretation - Patients sustaining a fracture had approximately a 7-fold increased mortality at 30 days and over 2-fold increased mortality at 1 year as compared with what would be expected in the general population. High mortality rates were seen for patients with axial skeletal and proximal extremity fractures, indicating frailty in these patient groups.

Nonsurvival Distributions in Pediatric Burn Patients: A Comparative Study of Two National Databases.

A contemporary, age-specific model for the distribution of burn mortality in children has not been developed for over a decade. Using data from TriNetX, a global federated health research network, and the American Burn Association's Nation Burn Repository (NBR), we investigated nonsurvival distributions for pediatric burns in the United States. Pediatric burn patients aged 0 to 20 between 2010 and 2020 were identified in TriNetX from 41 Healthcare Organizations using ICD-10 codes (T.20-T.30) and identified as lived/died. These were compared to the nonsurvival data from 90 certified burn centers in the NBR database between 2016 and 2018. The patient population was stratified by age into subgroups of 0 to 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 14, and 15 to 20 years. Overall, mortality rates for pediatric burn patients were found to be 0.62% in NBR and 0.52% in TrinetX. Boys had a higher incidence of mortality than girls in both databases (0.34% vs 0.28% NBR, P = .13; 0.31% vs 0.21% TriNetX, P < .001). Comparison of ethnic cohorts between 2010 to 2015 and 2016 to 2020 subgroups showed that nonsurvival rates of African American children increased relative to white children (TriNetX, P < .001); however, evidence was insufficient to conclude that African American children die more frequently than other ethnicities (NBR, P = .054). When analyzing subgroups in TriNetX, burned children aged 5 to 9 had significantly increased frequency of nonsurvival (P < .001). However, NBR data suggested that children aged 0 to 4 experience the highest frequency of mortality (P < .001). The nonsurvival distributions between these two large databases accurately reflect nonsurvival rates in burned children.

Inter-hospital transfer of polytrauma and severe traumatic brain injury patients: Retrospective nationwide cohort study using data from the Swiss Trauma Register.

INTRODUCTION: Polytrauma and traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are among the most vulnerable patients in trauma care and exhibit increased morbidity and mortality. Timely care is essential for their outcome. Severe TBI with initially high scores on the Glasgow Coma (GCS) scores is difficult to recognise on scene and referral to a Major Trauma Center (MTC) might be delayed. Therefore, we examined current referral practice, injury patterns and mortality in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, nationwide cohort study with Swiss Trauma Register (STR) data between 01/012015 and 31/12/2018. STR includes patients ≥16 years with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) for head >2. We performed Cox proportional hazard models with injury type as the primary outcome and mortality as the dependent variable. Secondary outcomes were inter-hospital transfer and age. RESULTS: 9,595 patients were included. Mortality was 12%. 2,800 patients suffered from isolated TBI. 69% were men. Median age was 61 years and median ISS 21. Two thirds of TBI patients had a GCS of 13-15 on admission to the Emergency Department (ED). 26% of patients were secondarily transferred to an MTC. Patients with isolated TBI and those aged ≥65 years were transferred more often. Crude analysis showed a significantly elevated hazard for death of 1.48 (95%CI 1.28-1.70) for polytrauma patients with severe TBI and a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.82 (95%CI 1.58-2.09) for isolated severe TBI, compared to polytrauma patients without TBI. Patients directly admitted to the MTC had a significantly elevated HR for death of 1.63 (95%CI 1.40-1.89), compared to those with secondary transfer. CONCLUSIONS: A high initial GCS does not exclude the presence of severe TBI and triage to an MTC should be seriously considered for elderly TBI patients.

Valproic Acid Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Hemorrhage and Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is the leading cause of death among young people. These patients have a high incidence of kidney injury, which independently increases the risk of mortality. As valproic acid (VPA) treatment has been shown to improve survival in animal models of lethal trauma, we hypothesized that it would also attenuate the degree of acute kidney injury. METHODS: We analyzed data from two separate experiments where swine were subjected to lethal insults.  Model 1: hemorrhage (50% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 72-h damage control resuscitation). Model 2: polytrauma (traumatic brain injury, 40% blood volume hemorrhage, femur fracture, rectus crush and grade V liver laceration). Animals were resuscitated with normal saline (NS) +/- VPA 150 mg/kg after a 1-h shock phase in both models (n = 5-6/group). Serum samples were analyzed for creatinine (Cr) using colorimetry on a Liasys 330 chemistry analyzer. Proteomic analysis was performed on kidney tissue sampled at the time of necropsy. RESULTS: VPA treatment significantly (P < 0.05) improved survival in both models. (Model 1: 80% vs 20%; Model 2: 83% vs. 17%). Model 1 (Hemorrhage alone): Cr increased from a baseline of 1.2 to 3.0 in NS control animals (P < 0.0001) 8 h after hemorrhage, whereas it rose only to 2.1 in VPA treated animals (P = 0.004). Model 2 (Polytrauma): Cr levels increased from baseline of 1.3 to 2.5 mg/dL (P = 0.01) in NS control animals 4 h after injury but rose to only 1.8 in VPA treated animals (P = 0.02). Proteomic analysis of kidney tissue identified metabolic pathways were most affected by VPA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of VPA (150 mg/kg) offers significant protection against acute kidney injury in swine models of polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock.

Cost-effectiveness of immediate total-body CT in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2 trial).

BACKGROUND: The effect of immediate total-body CT (iTBCT) on health economic aspects in patients with severe trauma is an underreported issue. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of iTBCT compared with conventional radiological imaging with selective CT (standard work-up (STWU)) during the initial trauma evaluation. METHODS: In this multicentre RCT, adult patients with a high suspicion of severe injury were randomized in-hospital to iTBCT or STWU. Hospital healthcare costs were determined for the first 6 months after the injury. The probability of iTBCT being cost-effective was calculated for various levels of willingness-to-pay per extra patient alive. RESULTS: A total of 928 Dutch patients with complete clinical follow-up were included. Mean costs of hospital care were €25 809 (95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated (bca) c.i. €22 617 to €29 137) for the iTBCT group and €26 155 (€23 050 to €29 344) for the STWU group, a difference per patient in favour of iTBCT of €346 (€4987 to €4328) (P = 0.876). Proportions of patients alive at 6 months were not different. The proportion of patients alive without serious morbidity was 61.6 per cent in the iTBCT group versus 66.7 per cent in the STWU group (difference -5.1 per cent; P = 0.104). The probability of iTBCT being cost-effective in keeping patients alive remained below 0.56 for the whole group, but was higher in patients with multiple trauma (0.8-0.9) and in those with traumatic brain injury (more than 0.9). CONCLUSION: Economically, from a hospital healthcare provider perspective, iTBCT should be the diagnostic strategy of first choice in patients with multiple trauma or traumatic brain injury.