Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(2): 351-355, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-782872

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the long term outcomes of temporary urethral stent placement for the treatment of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients who underwent temporary polymer coated urethral stent placement due to recurrent bulbar urethral stricture between 2010 and 2014 were enrolled in the study. The long term outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.3±6.4 (44–81). The overall clinical success was achieved in 18 (64.2%) of the 28 patients at a median (range) follow-up of 29 (7–46) months. No patient reported discomfort at the stent site. Stone formation was observed at the urethral stent implantation area only in one patient. Stenosis occurred in the distal end of the stents in two patients and took place in bulbar urethra in seven patients after removed the stents. The mean maximum urine flow rates were 6.24±2.81mL/sec and 19.12±4.31mL/sec before and at 3 months after the procedure, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, the success rate of temporary urethral stent placement has remained at 64.2% at a median follow-up of 29 months. Therefore, our outcomes have not achieved desired success rate for the standard treatment of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Stents , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Estreitamento Uretral/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Remoção de Dispositivo , Dilatação/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(1): 91-100, jan-feb/2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-742871

RESUMO

Objective To review the technique and outcome of perineal urethrostomy or urethral perineostomy and to identify factors related to the procedure failure. Material and methods We studied 17 patients who underwent perineal urethrostomy between 2009-2013 in a single hospital. Success was defined as no need for additional surgical treatment or urethral dilatation. We reviewed the clinical data related to age, weight, previous urethral surgery, diabetes, hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, lichen sclerosus and other causes and studied their association with the procedure failure (univariate analysis). We completed the analysis with a multivariate test based on binary regression. Results The average follow-up was 39.41 months. From all the causes, we found Lichen Sclerosus in 35%, idiopathic etiology in 29% and prior hypospadia repair in 18%. Postoperative failure occurred in 3 patients, with a final success of 82.4%. The binary regression model showed as independent risk factors ischemic cardiopathy (OR: 2.34), and the presence of Lichen Sclerosis (OR: 3.21). Conclusions The success rate with the perineal urethrostomy technique shows it to be a valid option above all when we preserve the urethral blood supply and plate. Lichen sclerosus and ischemic vascular problems are risk factors to re-stenosis. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Períneo/cirurgia , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Estomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Análise de Regressão , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Variância , Seguimentos , Falha de Tratamento , Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/complicações , Balanite Xerótica Obliterante/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA