Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Brazil - comparison of outcomes from different static model types
Van Bellinghen, Laure-Anne; Marijam, Alen; de Araujo, Gabriela Tannus Branco; Gomez, Jorge; Van Vlaenderen, Ilse.
Afiliação
  • Van Bellinghen, Laure-Anne; CHESS in Health. Bonheiden. BE
  • Marijam, Alen; GSK. Wavre. BE
  • de Araujo, Gabriela Tannus Branco; AxiaBio. São Paulo. BR
  • Gomez, Jorge; GSK. Victoria, Buenos Aires. AR
  • Van Vlaenderen, Ilse; CHESS in Health. Bonheiden. BE
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 22(1): 1-10, Jan.-feb. 2018. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-951627
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Influenza burden in Brazil is considerable with 4.2-6.4 million cases in 2008 and influenza-like-illness responsible for 16.9% of hospitalizations. Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination may be assessed by different types of models, with limitations due to data availability, assumptions, and modelling approach. Objective: To understand the impact of model complexity, the cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccines in Brazil was estimated using three distinct models: a 1-year decision tree population model with three age groups (FLOU); a more detailed 1-year population model with five age groups (FLORA); and a more complex lifetime multi-cohort Markov model with nine age groups (FLORENCE). Methods: Analysis 1 (impact of model structure) compared each model using the same data inputs (i.e., best available data for FLOU). Analysis 2 (impact of increasing granularity) compared each model populated with the best available data for that model. Results: Using the best data for each model, the discounted cost-utility ratio of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine was R$20,428 with FLOU, R$22,768 with FLORA (versus R$20,428 in Analysis 1), and, R$19,257 with FLORENCE (versus R$22,490 in Analysis 1) using a lifetime horizon. Conceptual differences between FLORA and FLORENCE meant the same assumption regarding increased all-cause mortality in at-risk individuals had an opposite effect on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Analysis 2 versus 1, and a proportionally higher number of vaccinated elderly in FLORENCE reduced this ratio in Analysis 2. Discussion: FLOU provided adequate cost-effectiveness estimates with data in broad age groups. FLORA increased insights (e.g., in healthy versus at-risk, paediatric, respiratory/non-respiratory complications). FLORENCE provided greater insights and precision (e.g., in elderly, costs and complications, lifetime cost-effectiveness). Conclusion: All three models predicted a cost per quality-adjusted life year gained for quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in the range of R$19,257 (FLORENCE) to R$22,768 (FLORA) with the best available data in Brazil (Appendix A).
Assuntos


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Temas: Saúde do idoso Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Vacinas contra Influenza / Vacinação / Modelos Econômicos / Influenza Humana Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. infect. dis Assunto da revista: Doenças Transmissíveis Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Argentina / Bélgica / Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: AxiaBio/BR / CHESS in Health/BE / GSK/AR / GSK/BE

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Temas: Saúde do idoso Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Vacinas contra Influenza / Vacinação / Modelos Econômicos / Influenza Humana Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. infect. dis Assunto da revista: Doenças Transmissíveis Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Argentina / Bélgica / Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: AxiaBio/BR / CHESS in Health/BE / GSK/AR / GSK/BE