Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anaphylaxis in Latin America: a report of the online Latin American survey on anaphylaxis (OLASA)
Sole, Dirceu; Ivancevich, Juan Carlos; Borges, Mario Sanchez; Coelho, Magna Adaci; Rosario, Nelson A; Ardusso, Ledit Ramón Francisco; Bernd, Luis Antônio Guerra; Latin American Anaphylaxis Working Group.
Afiliação
  • Sole, Dirceu; Federal University of São Paulo. Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Department of Pediatrics. Division of Allergy. São Paulo. BR
  • Ivancevich, Juan Carlos; Universidad del Salvador. Medical School. Immunology. Buenos Aires. AR
  • Borges, Mario Sanchez; Centro Médico-Docente La Trinidad. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department. Caracas. VE
  • Coelho, Magna Adaci; University of Montes Claros. Minas Gerais. BR
  • Rosario, Nelson A; Federal University of Paraná. Department of Pediatrics. Curitiba. BR
  • Ardusso, Ledit Ramón Francisco; National University of Rosario. Faculty of Medical Sciences. AR
  • Bernd, Luis Antônio Guerra; Federal Faculty Foundation of Medical Sciences of Porto Alegre. Division of Immunology and Immunopathology. Rio Grande do Sul. BR
Clinics ; Clinics;66(6): 943-947, 2011. tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-594359
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n =634). RESULTS: Of all patients, 68.5 percent were older than 18 years, 41.6 percent were male, and 65.4 percent experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4 percent of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent), and insect stings (14.9 percent). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0 percent) and respiratory (79.0 percent). The majority of patients (71.6 percent) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2 percent), and 43.5 percent recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3 percent received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5 percent and 70.2 percent were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9 percent of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2 percent were hospitalized. Only 5.8 percent of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7 percent returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent and insect stings (14.9 percent) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: Saude_idoso Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Inquéritos Epidemiológicos / Anafilaxia Idioma: En Revista: Clinics Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: Saude_idoso Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Inquéritos Epidemiológicos / Anafilaxia Idioma: En Revista: Clinics Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article