RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-term data on COVID-19 vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and acceptance in adults with CHD are lacking. METHODS: This is a prospective study including adults with CHD patients undergoing COVID-19 vaccination from January 2021 to June 2022. Data on adverse events, antispike IgG titre, previous or subsequent COVID-19 infection, booster doses, and patients' attitude towards vaccination were collected. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety CHD patients (36 ± 13 years, 53% male, 94% with moderate/complex defects) were prospectively included: 433 (88%) received a Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine, 31 (6%) Moderna mRNA vaccine, 23 (5%) AstraZeneca-Oxford ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, and 3 (0.6%) Janssen Vaccine; 310 (63%) received a booster dose. Median follow-up after vaccination was 1.53 [1.41-1.58] years. No major adverse event was reported. Eighty-two fully vaccinated patients contracted COVID-19 during follow-up after a median of 5.4 [4.3-6.5] months from the last dose. One patient with Ebstein's disease died from severe COVID-19. Symptoms' duration in patients who tested positive after vaccination was significantly shorter than in the group tested positive before vaccination (5.5 [3-8] versus 9 [2.2-15] days, p = 0.04). Median antispike IgG titre measured in 280 individuals (57%) at a median of 1.4 [0.7-3.3] months from the last dose was 2381 [901-8307] BAU/ml. Sixty patients (12%) also showed positive antinucleocapsid antibodies, demonstrating previous SARS-COV2 exposure. Twenty-nine percent appeared to have concerns regarding vaccine safety and 42% reported fearing potential effects of the vaccine on their cardiac disease before discussing with their CHD cardiologist. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines appear safe in the mid-term follow-up in adults with CHD with satisfactory immunogenicity and reduction of symptoms' duration in case of infection.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Seguimentos , RNA Viral , Vacinas de mRNA , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Imunoglobulina GRESUMO
To evaluate biventricular mechanics by means of echo-derived myocardial work (MW) analysis in patients with a systemic right ventricle (sRV). Comprehensive echo data were collected in all patients with a sRV who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at our tertiary centre between 2020 and 2021 including sRV function indices, global longitudinal strain (GLS) of right and left ventricle (RV/LV), biventricular MW, and atrial strain in those with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA). Fifty-six patients (37 [30.97-45.87]years, 59% male) and 49 healthy individuals matched per age and sex were included for comparison. Global work index (GWI:1106 [869.80-1293.10] Vs 314.2 [281.5-358.2]mmHg%, p < 0.0001) and global constructive work(GCW: 1542.50 [1338.9-1718.50] Vs 416.4 [365.70-464]mmHg%, p < 0.0001) were both increased for sRV compared to normal RV, reflecting exposition to a systemic afterload, with a contemporary raise in wasted work (GWW:197 [138.50-322.20] Vs 26.09 [17.80-43.48]mmHg%, p < 0.0001) and impaired efficiency (GWE:89 [83-93.54] Vs 93.67 [91.67-96] %, p < 0.0001). Conversely, sRV showed reduced MW indices in comparison to normal LV(p < 0.0001 for all). Non-systemic LV demonstrated normal GLS values (19.51 ± 3.9%), but reduced GWI (479 [368-665] Vs 2172 [1978-2386]mmHg%, p < 0.0001) and GCW (708 [490-815]mmHg% Vs 86.5 [59.25-118], p < 0.0001). Nevertherless, non-systemic LV showed also impaired efficiency (91 [88-94] Vs 95 [94-97]%, p < 0.0001). LVGLS values were related to RVGLS (R = 0.5, p = 0.00019), suggesting a consistent interventricular dependency. Atrial strain could be assessed in 16 out of 20 (80%) patients with ccTGA: both atria had reduced strain values compared to their normal counterparts. Moreover, pulmonary atrial strain during the reservoir phase was related to LVGWE (R = 0.58, p = 0.047) and inversely related to LVGLS (R = - 0.71, p = 0.0043). MW analysis is feasible in sRV and may provide additional clinical data. In our cohort MW revealed biventricular impairment, in particular for non-systemic LV, in spite of normal GLS values.
Assuntos
Ventrículos do Coração , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Disfunção Ventricular Direita , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Função Ventricular Direita , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/etiologia , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transposição das Grandes Artérias Corrigida Congenitamente , Ecocardiografia , Contração MiocárdicaRESUMO
Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a major issue during follow-up of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), leading to significant mortality. Case summary: A 37-year-old woman with transposition of great arteries and previous Mustard operation developed a drug-resistant pneumonia shortly after a pacemaker implant procedure performed at a local hospital. After referral to the ACHD centre, the patient was diagnosed with multivalvular IE with biventricular involvement by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. On admission, the patient was already in acute respiratory distress and presented both systemic and pulmonary embolization. Despite adequate treatment was promptly started, the patient developed multiorgan failure. Discussion: This case depicts a particularly aggressive of infective endocarditis forms caused with biventricular involvement and multiple embolization. Patients with congenital heart disease are at high risk of IE with adverse impact on the prognosis. Early recognition and treatment are the keys to improve prognosis. Therefore, suspicion should be high, especially following invasive procedure, which should be preferably performed at ACHD specialized centres.
RESUMO
AIM: To analyze left ventricular (LV) mechanics through advanced echocardiography, including speckle tracking analysis and myocardial work (MW) in a cohort of adults with repaired aortic coarctation (CoA). METHODS: Data on standard echocardiography, LV speckle-tracking and MW analysis were collected in CoA patients > 18 years with no significant recoartation or valvular disease and normal LV ejection fraction at the time of the exam. MW indices were calculated using the blood pressure measured in the right arm. A group of healthy subjects with comparable sex, age and body surface area was included for comparison. RESULTS: Eighty-nine CoA patients and 70 healthy subjects were included. Patients had higher systolic blood pressure (p < 0.0001), LV mass index (p < 0.0001), left atrial volume index (p = 0.005) and E/E' ratio (p = 0.001). Despite similar LV ejection fraction, speckle tracking analysis revealed lower global longitudinal strain (GLS: - 18.3[17-19] vs - 20.7[19-22]%, p < 0.0001) and increased peak systolic dispersion (PSD: 45[40-54] vs 37.5[32-43] ms, p < 0.0001) in CoA patients. Global work index (GWI) and global constructive work were similar to healthy controls (p = 0.6 and 0.5, respectively), whereas CoA patients showed significant increased wasted work (GWW: 125[90-185] vs 89.5[64-127]mmHg%, p < 0.0001) and a mild but significant reduction in global work efficiency (GWE: 93%[92-95] vs 95%[94-97], p < 0.0001). Moreover, when stratifying for GLS values, MW analysis showed increased GWW and PSD with impaired GWE in 54(61%) patients with normal GLS compared to healthy individuals. Spearman's linear method illustrated an inverse relation between GWE and PSD (r: - 0.53, p < 0.0001), while GCW was associated with peak (r: 0.2, p = 0.01) and mean gradient across the descending aorta (r: 0.3, p = 0.004) and with systolic blood pressure (r: 0.48, p < 0.0001). PSD was the sole univariate predictor of GWE on linear regression analysis (ß: - 0.1 [- 0.16 to - 0.07], p < 0.0001), whereas female sex, SBP and gradients across the descending aorta were independently associated with higher GCW values. When CoA patients were divided based on the history of redo CoA repair and arterial hypertension, no significant differences in MW indices were found. CONCLUSIONS: MW is a novel echocardiographic tool, which provides additional information on LV performance in CoA patients over GLS allowing a more comprehensive understanding of LV dysfunction mechanisms in a setting of increased afterload.
Assuntos
Coartação Aórtica , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Coartação Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Coartação Aórtica/cirurgia , Coartação Aórtica/complicações , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Volume Sistólico/fisiologiaRESUMO
Background: The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand better how different echocardiographic modalities are used and accessed in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories: 112 centers (49%) in the northern, 43 centers (19%) in the central, and 73 (32%) in the southern regions. During the month of observation, we collected 101,050 transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations performed in all centers. As concern other modalities there were performed 5497 transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations in 161/228 centers (71%); 4057 stress echocardiography (SE) examinations in 179/228 centers (79%); and examinations with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in 151/228 centers (66%). We did not find significant regional variations between the different modalities. The usage of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was significantly higher in the northern (84%) versus central (49%) and southern (45%) centers (P < 0.001). Lung ultrasound (LUS) was performed in 154 centers (66%), without difference between cardiology and noncardiology centers. The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was evaluated mainly using the qualitative method in 223 centers (94%), occasionally with the Simpson method in 193 centers (85%), and with selective use of the three-dimensional (3D) method in only 23 centers (10%). 3D TTE was present in 137 centers (70%), and 3D TEE in all centers where TEE was done (71%). The assessment of LV diastolic function was done routinely in 80% of the centers. Right ventricular function was evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in all centers, using tricuspid valve annular systolic velocity by tissue Doppler imaging in 53% of the centers, and using fractional area change in 33% of the centers. When we divided into cardiology (179, 78%) and noncardiology (49, 22%) centers, we found significant differences in the SE (93% vs. 26%, P < 0.001), TEE (85% vs. 18%), UCA (67% vs. 43%, P < 0001), and STE (87% vs. 20%, P < 0.001). The incidence of LUS evaluation was similar between the cardiology and noncardiology centers (69% vs. 61%, P = NS). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that digital infrastructures and advanced echocardiography modalities, such as 3D and STE, are widely available in Italy with a notable diffuse uptake of LUS in the core TTE examination, a suboptimal diffusion of PACS recording, and conservative use of UCA, 3D, and strain. There are significant differences between northern and central-southern regions and echocardiographic laboratories that pertain to the cardiac unit. This inhomogeneous distribution of technology represents one of the main issues that must be solved to standardize the practice of echocardiography.
RESUMO
Background: The Italian Society of Echography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand the volumes of activity, modalities and stressors used during stress echocardiography (SE) in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved through an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories, and SE examinations were performed in 179 centers (80.6%): 87 centers (47.5%) were in the northern regions of Italy, 33 centers (18.4%) were in the central regions, and 61 (34.1%) in the southern regions. We annotated a total of 4057 SE. We divided the SE centers into three groups, according to the numbers of SE performed: <10 SE (low-volume activity, 40 centers), between 10 and 39 SE (moderate volume activity, 102 centers) and ≥40 SE (high volume activity, 37 centers). Dipyridamole was used in 139 centers (77.6%); exercise in 120 centers (67.0%); dobutamine in 153 centers (85.4%); pacing in 37 centers (21.1%); and adenosine in 7 centers (4.0%). We found a significant difference between the stressors used and volume of activity of the centers, with a progressive increase in the prevalence of number of stressors from low to high volume activity (P = 0.033). The traditional evaluation of regional wall motion of the left ventricle was performed in all centers, with combined assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in 90 centers (50.3%): there was a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: the incidence of analysis of CFVR was significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (32.5%, 41.0% and 73.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). The lung ultrasound (LUS) was assessed in 67 centers (37.4%). Furthermore for LUS, we found a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (25.0%, 35.3% and 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that SE was significantly widespread and practiced throughout Italy. In addition to the traditional indication to coronary artery disease based on regional wall motion analysis, other indications are emerging with an increase in the use of LUS and CFVR, especially in high-volume centers.