Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Rifampicin in Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Brain Extracellular Fluid in South African Children with Tuberculous Meningitis.

Limited knowledge is available on the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in children with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and its penetration into brain tissue, which is the site of infection. In this analysis, we characterize the distribution of rifampicin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lumbar (LCSF) and ventricular (VCSF), and brain extracellular fluid (ECF). Children with TBM were included in this pharmacokinetic analysis. Sparse plasma, LCSF, and VCSF samples were collected opportunistically, as clinically indicated. Brain ECF was sampled using microdialysis (MD). Rifampicin was quantified with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in all samples, and 25-desacetyl rifampicin in the plasma samples. The data were interpreted with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, with the CSF and brain ECF modeled as "effect compartments." Data were available from 61 children, with median (min-max) age of 2 (0.3 to 10) years and weight of 11.0 (4.8 to 49.0) kg. A one-compartment model for parent and metabolite with first-order absorption and elimination via saturable hepatic clearance described the data well. Allometric scaling, maturation, and auto-induction of clearance were included. The pseudopartition coefficient between plasma and LCSF/VCSF was ~5%, while the value for ECF was only ~0.5%, possibly reflecting low recovery of rifampicin using MD. The equilibration half-life between plasma and LCSF/VCSF was ~4 h and between plasma and ECF ~2 h. Our study confirms previous reports showing that rifampicin concentrations in the LCSF are lower than in plasma and provides novel knowledge about rifampicin in the VCSF and the brain tissue. Despite MD being semiquantitative because the relative recovery cannot be quantified, our study presents a proof-of-concept that rifampicin reaches the brain tissue and that MD is an attractive technique to study site-of-disease pharmacokinetics in TBM.

Optimizing dosing of the cycloserine pro-drug terizidone in children with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

There are no pharmacokinetic data in children on terizidone, a pro-drug of cycloserine and a World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended group B drug for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment. We collected pharmacokinetic data in children <15 years routinely receiving 15-20 mg/kg of daily terizidone for RR-TB treatment. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of cycloserine assuming a 2-to-1 molecular ratio between terizidone and cycloserine. We included 107 children with median (interquartile range) age and weight of 3.33 (1.55, 5.07) years and 13.0 (10.1, 17.0) kg, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of cycloserine was described with a one-compartment model with first-order elimination and parallel transit compartment absorption. Allometric scaling using fat-free mass best accounted for the effect of body size, and clearance displayed maturation with age. The clearance in a typical 13 kg child was estimated at 0.474 L/h. The mean absorption transit time when capsules were opened and administered as powder was significantly faster compared to when capsules were swallowed whole (10.1 vs 72.6 min) but with no effect on bioavailability. Lower bioavailability (-16%) was observed in children with weight-for-age z-score below -2. Compared to adults given 500 mg daily terizidone, 2022 WHO-recommended pediatric doses result in lower exposures in weight bands 3-10 kg and 36-46 kg. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model in children for cycloserine dosed as terizidone and characterized the effects of body size, age, formulation manipulation, and underweight-for-age. With current terizidone dosing, pediatric cycloserine exposures are lower than adult values for several weight groups. New optimized dosing is suggested for prospective evaluation.

Linezolid toxicity in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is recommended for treating drug-resistant TB. Adverse events are a concern to prescribers but have not been systematically studied at the standard dose, and the relationship between linezolid exposure and clinical toxicity is not completely elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study to describe the incidence and determinants of linezolid toxicity, and to determine a drug exposure threshold for toxicity, among patients with rifampicin-resistant TB in South Africa. Linezolid exposures were estimated from a population pharmacokinetic model. Mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse toxicity outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one participants, 63% HIV positive, were enrolled and followed for a median of 86 weeks. Linezolid was permanently discontinued for toxicity in 32 (21%) participants. Grade 3 or 4 linezolid-associated adverse events occurred in 21 (14%) participants. Mean haemoglobin concentrations increased with time on treatment (0.03 g/dL per week; 95% CI 0.02-0.03). Linezolid trough concentration, male sex and age (but not HIV positivity) were independently associated with a decrease in haemoglobin >2 g/dL. Trough linezolid concentration of 2.5 mg/L or higher resulted in optimal model performance to describe changing haemoglobin and treatment-emergent anaemia (adjusted OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-6.8). SNPs 2706A > G and 3010G > A in mitochondrial DNA were not associated with linezolid toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent discontinuation of linezolid was common, but linezolid-containing therapy was associated with average improvement in toxicity measures. HIV co-infection was not independently associated with linezolid toxicity. Linezolid trough concentration of 2.5 mg/L should be evaluated as a target for therapeutic drug monitoring.