The impact of pre-existing venous pathology on lower limb free flap reconstruction and the role of preoperative screening: a systematic review.

Lower limb reconstruction is performed to replace like with like and achieve tissue durability. Free flaps are a method of reconstruction commonly used to manage cases of lower limb deficits. However, the failure rate is 8.5%, with venous thrombosis and congestion playing a significant role. Despite this, preoperative venous mapping of recipient site before free flap reconstruction is not routinely practiced, often resulting in pathologies remaining unidentified until the intraoperative stage. The aim of the review was to evaluate the existing literature on the topic of lower limb preoperative venous assessment, screening, and its effect on lower limb free flap survival. Five different databases were searched from their inception to August 2021. The search terms and included studies were independently reviewed by two investigators for their eligibility. Eleven articles were eligible for inclusion, with a combined patient population of 99, and 107 flaps were identified to have lower limb pathology at the donor or recipient vein. Venous pathology was detected preoperatively in 69 veins using ultrasound duplex scanning and computed tomography angiography; of them, 3 (4.34%) resulted in failure. In comparison, 38 veins were diagnosed with venous pathology intraoperatively; of them, 5 (13.85%) failed. The studies evaluated in this review demonstrated that preoperative screening for venous pathology showed a higher flap survival rate. It can therefore be inferred that developing a standardized preoperative process for identifying venous issues in lower limb free flap reconstruction may improve outcomes. This can be explored in future research, with a focus on assessing the validity and efficacy of such screening tools, and their role in the management of patients identified with venous pathology.

Gender parity at the podium in UK plastic surgery conferences.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in the proportion of female plastic surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK), all-male panels continue to prevail. This article sought to establish whether the genders of speakers at conferences hosted by leading UK plastic surgery associations, the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS), and the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS), are representative of the consultant workforce. METHODS: Data on the gender distribution of plastic surgeons in the workforce over the last decade were obtained from NHS Digital Workforce Statistics. The demographics of invited speakers were sought from conference agendas for both BAPRAS (from 2012 to 2022) and BAAPS (from 2014 to 2021) posted on their association's websites. RESULTS: The proportion of female consultants increased from 16% in 2012 to 22% in 2022. The average proportion of female speakers at BAPRAS conferences was 16% ± 9% SD that was similar to the proportion of female consultants in practice (p = 0.432). In contrast, the average proportion of female speakers at BAAPS conferences was lower than those in practice (7.88% ± 8.29% SD, p = 0.0032). At BAAPS, 43% of speakers were UK plastic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Although the podium speakers at BAPRAS were reflective of the consultant population, BAAPS had little to no representation of UK based female plastic surgeons. Therefore, the conference organisers need to intentionally ensure that representation at podium is reflective of the workforce.

Managing Small Joint Septic Arthritis of the Hand.

Background: Current guidance for the management of septic arthritis is limited to large joints and, therefore, unspecific to the small joints of the hand, which may present differently, require different diagnostic approaches, and have different complications. The aim of this article was to review current treatment trends for the management of small joint septic arthritis (SJSA) of the hand and offer guidelines for its management. Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines and a survey distributed to Fellows of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand to establish expert opinion. The review and survey were combined to present a set of specific SJSA of the hand infection guidelines. Results: All 20 included studies recommended physical drainage of infected joint fluid; subsequent lavage and early antibiotic therapy, with physiotherapist-guided joint mobilisation. Statistical analysis of the 77 responses to our survey revealed that (in order of preference) the diagnosis was made by history and examination, blood tests, joint aspiration and vital signs; and for interventions: joint elevation and intravenous antibiotics; then joint washout repeated within 48 hours, if necessary. Conclusions: Small joint infection differs from large joint infection because it is difficult to obtain joint aspirate without damaging or opening the joint. We, therefore, recommend utilising exclusion blood tests, imaging and the clinical picture to establish the diagnosis and implement early treatment and rehabilitation. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Autologous Fat Grafting for Post-mastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fat grafting has been described as a potential treatment for post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) following oncological breast surgery. The study's aim was to compare and contrast the current literature using a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the evidence. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), were searched. Data synthesis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK), with 95% confidence intervals. All randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing lipofilling for PMPS were included. A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria with five articles being used in data analysis for the mean percentage reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The primary outcome measure was the mean percentage reduction in the VAS pain score. Secondary outcomes included the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and the quality of life assessments post treatment. Overall, a total of 266 patients received fat transfer for PMPS, and 164 were in the control group. The mean percentage reduction in VAS score was 19.8 (10.82, 28.82; p < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes, including health-related quality of life, showed good outcomes post fat transfer. This involved breast softness, cosmesis, and psychosocial well-being. The results from this meta-analysis suggest that autologous fat grafting is an efficacious treatment for reducing pain caused by PMPS. The authors suggest more high-quality trials are needed to enhance the current evidence base.