What to do with foundation therapies for heart failure for patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis.

There is a significant burden of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in the end-stage kidney disease population, driven by traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Despite its prevalence, heart failure is difficult to diagnose in the dialysis population due to overlapping clinical presentations, limitations of investigations, and the impact on the cardiorenal axis. 'Foundation therapies' are the key medications which improve patient outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and include beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. They are underutilised in the dialysis population due to the exclusion of chronic kidney disease patients from major trials and legitimate clinical concerns e.g. hyperkalaemia, intradialytic hypotension and residual kidney function preservation. A coordinated cardiorenal multidisciplinary approach can guide appropriate diagnostic considerations (biomarkers interpretation, imaging, addressing unique complications of kidney disease), optimise dialysis management (prescription length, frequency and ultrafiltration targets) and when at euvolaemia facilitate the stepwise introduction of appropriate foundation therapies.

Associations of health literacy with self-management behaviours and health outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Low health literacy is widely reported in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and has been associated with reduced disease self-management, poor health outcomes, increased mortality and poorer quality of life. However, these associations are still not well understood. METHODS: Electronic-based systematic searches were performed to identify studies examining associations between health literacy and self-management behaviours and/or health outcomes in patients with CKD. A tabular and narrative synthesis of the data was performed. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity of study designs and methods. RESULTS: Searches identified 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 41 published articles, six conference abstracts, and one thesis were included. Of the 48 studies, 11 were cohort and 37 were cross-sectional. In total there were 25,671 patients; 16,952 from cohort studies. Median study sample size was 159 (IQR 92-275). Study quality was high (5), moderate (24) and poor (19). Thirteen measures of health literacy were used. Despite the limitations of the available evidence, there appear to be consistent relationships between higher health literacy and favourable self-management behaviours for patients with CKD. Definitive relationships between health literacy and patient outcomes are far less clear and remain incompletely understood. DISCUSSION: Conclusive evidence describing a causal link between health literacy and patient outcomes remains limited, but for many outcomes, a consistent association is described. In addition to associations with mortality, hospitalisation and clinical events, there were consistent associations between health literacy and favourable self-management behaviours which could support the development of patient education aimed at improving health literacy.

Indications and considerations for kidney biopsy: an overview of clinical considerations for the non-specialist.

Around 3 million people in the UK have chronic kidney disease and 20% of hospital admissions are complicated by acute kidney injury. Decline in kidney function is not a diagnosis; it is essential to identify and treat underlying causes of acute and chronic kidney disease to either achieve recovery or slow the decline of kidney function. Thorough clinical assessment and simple investigations help determine the category of kidney injury (pre-renal, intrinsic or post-renal) and inform the need for kidney biopsy, which can provide significant information in the evaluation of suspected intrinsic kidney disease, supporting diagnosis, guiding prognosis and management, and identifying disease relapse. The procedure is invasive and not without risk, which although small has the potential to be both organ- and life-threatening. This review outlines roles of kidney biopsy for the non-specialist, with focus of its role in patients with diabetes, lupus, myeloma and in the older patient.

Evaluation of the design, conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials in the haemodialysis population: a scoping review and interview study.

BACKGROUND: Fewer trials are conducted in nephrology than any other specialty, often failing to recruit to target, resulting in unclear evidence affecting translation to clinical practice. This mixed-methods study aims to provide guidance for designing and reporting future randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the haemodialysis population. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted. Five databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for RCTs published between 2013 and 2019 involving prevalent adult haemodialysis patients. Reporting of sample size, recruitment, retention and statistical significance of primary outcome were assessed. Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals from a single centre during dialysis sessions. Interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Of 786 RCTs identified, 636 (80.9%) were parallel-group, 139 (17.7%) were crossover and 11 (1.4%) were cluster (including one stepped-wedge) design. Sample size justification was reported in 73.1%, 53.8% and 45.5% of parallel-group, crossover and cluster trials, respectively.Target recruitment was achieved by 45.5% of cluster, 53.8% of crossover and 57.7% of parallel-group trials with patient retention at 75.6%, 83.1% and 87.8%, respectively. Primary outcome reached statistical significance in 81.8% of cluster trials, 69.2% of parallel-group and 38.5% of crossover trials.Themes identified from individual interviews: perceptions of the convenience of trial participation; group allocation; perceptions of the benefits and adverse effects of taking part in clinical trials. CONCLUSION: The recruitment and reporting of RCTs involving people on haemodialysis could be improved. Involvement of all stakeholders and especially participants in the trial design process may address issues around participant burden and ultimately improve the evidence base for clinical practice.

The cardiovascular determinants of physical function in patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are often sedentary and decreased functional capacity associates with mortality. The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and physical function has not been fully explored. Understanding the relationships between prognostically relevant measures of CVD and physical function may offer insight into how exercise interventions might target specific elements of CVD. 130 patients on haemodialysis (mean age 57 ± 15 years, 73% male, dialysis vintage 1.3 years (0.5, 3.4), recruited to the CYCLE-HD trial (ISRCTN11299707), underwent cardiovascular phenotyping with cardiac MRI (left ventricular (LV) structure and function, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and native T1 mapping) and cardiac biomarker assessment. Participants completed the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and sit-to-stand 60 (STS60) as field-tests of physical function. Linear regression models identified CV determinants of physical function measures, adjusted for age, gender, BMI, diabetes, ethnicity and systolic blood pressure. Troponin I, PWV and global native T1 were univariate determinants of ISWT and STS60 performance. NT pro-BNP was a univariate determinant of ISWT performance. In multivariate models, NT pro-BNP and global native T1 were independent determinants of ISWT and STS60 performance. LV ejection fraction was an independent determinant of ISWT distance. However, age and diabetes had the strongest relationships with physical function. In conclusion, NT pro-BNP, global native T1 and LV ejection fraction were independent CV determinants of physical function. However, age and diabetes had the greatest independent influence. Targeting diabetic care may ameliorate deconditioning in these patients and a multimorbidity approach should be considered when developing exercise interventions.

A pilot randomised controlled trial of a structured, home-based exercise programme on cardiovascular structure and function in kidney transplant recipients: the ECSERT study design and methods.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). CVD risk scores underestimate risk in this population as CVD is driven by clustering of traditional and non-traditional risk factors, which lead to prognostic pathological changes in cardiovascular structure and function. While exercise may mitigate CVD in this population, evidence is limited, and physical activity levels and patient activation towards exercise and self-management are low. This pilot study will assess the feasibility of delivering a structured, home-based exercise intervention in a population of KTRs at increased cardiometabolic risk and evaluate the putative effects on cardiovascular structural and functional changes, cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, patient activation, healthcare utilisation and engagement with the prescribed exercise programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifty KTRs will be randomised 1:1 to: (1) the intervention; a 12week, home-based combined resistance and aerobic exercise intervention; or (2) the control; usual care. Intervention participants will have one introductory session for instruction and practice of the recommended exercises prior to receiving an exercise diary, dumbbells, resistance bands and access to instructional videos. The study will evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, randomisation, retention, assessment procedures and the intervention implementation. Outcomes, to be assessed prior to randomisation and postintervention, include: cardiac structure and function with stress perfusion cardiac MRI, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical function, blood biomarkers of cardiometabolic health, quality of life and patient activation. These data will be used to inform the power calculations for future definitive trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was reviewed and given favourable opinion by the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 19/EM/0209; 14 October 2019). Results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and will be disseminated to the patient and public community via social media, newsletter articles and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04123951.

The reproducibility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measures of aortic stiffness and their relationship to cardiac structure in prevalent haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is one of the earliest signs of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with chronic kidney disease and an independent predictor of mortality. It is thought to drive left ventricular (LV) remodelling, an established biomarker for mortality. The relationship between direct and indirect measures of aortic stiffness and LV remodelling is not defined in dialysis patients, nor are the reproducibility of methods used to assess aortic stiffness using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS: Using 3T CMR, we report the results of (i) the interstudy, interobserver and intra-observer reproducibility of ascending aortic distensibility (AAD), descending aortic distensibility (DAD) and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) in 10 haemodialysis (HD) patients and (ii) the relationship between AAD, DAD and aPWV and LV mass index (LVMi) and LV remodelling in 70 HD patients. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-observer variability of AAD, DAD and aPWV were excellent [intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.9 for all]. Interstudy reproducibility of AAD was excellent {ICC 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.99]}, but poor for DAD and aPWV [ICC 0.51 (-0.13-0.85) and 0.51 (-0.31-0.89)]. AAD, DAD and aPWV associated with LVMi on univariate analysis (ß = -0.244, P = 0.04; ß =-0.315, P < 0.001 and ß = 0.242, P = 0.04, respectively). Only systolic blood pressure, serum phosphate and a history of CVD remained independent determinants of LVMi on multivariable linear regression. CONCLUSIONS: AAD is the most reproducible CMR-derived measure of aortic stiffness in HD patients. CMR-derived measures of aortic stiffness were not independent determinants of LVMi in HD patients. Whether one should target blood pressure over aortic stiffness to mitigate cardiovascular risk still needs determination.

The importance of accurate measurement of aortic stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A key driver in this pathology is increased aortic stiffness, which is a strong, independent predictor of CV mortality in this population. Aortic stiffening is a potentially modifiable biomarker of CV dysfunction and in risk stratification for patients with CKD and ESRD. Previous work has suggested that therapeutic modification of aortic stiffness may ameliorate CV mortality. Nevertheless, future clinical implementation relies on the ability to accurately and reliably quantify stiffness in renal disease. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an indirect measure of stiffness and is the accepted standard for non-invasive assessment of aortic stiffness. It has typically been measured using techniques such as applanation tonometry, which is easy to use but hindered by issues such as the inability to visualize the aorta. Advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging now allow direct measurement of stiffness, using aortic distensibility, in addition to PWV. These techniques allow measurement of aortic stiffness locally and are obtainable as part of a comprehensive, multiparametric CV assessment. The evidence cannot yet provide a definitive answer regarding which technique or parameter can be considered superior. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of non-invasive methods that have been used to assess aortic stiffness, the key studies that have assessed aortic stiffness in patients with renal disease and why these tools should be standardized for use in clinical trial work.