New Insights Into the Alleged Kidney Donor Profile Index Labeling Effect on Kidney Utilization.

The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) became a driving factor in deceased donor kidney allocation on December 4, 2014, with the implementation of the kidney allocation system (KAS). On April 20, 2016, the annual recalibration of the Kidney Donor Risk Index into KDPI was incorrectly programmed in DonorNet, resulting in erroneously high KDPI values, by between 1 and 21 percentage points (e.g. actual KDPI of 70% was displayed as 86%). The error was corrected on May 19, 2016, <24 h after being recognized. During this 30-day period, the distribution of recipients largely resembled pre-KAS patterns. The observed discard rate of 22.9% was higher than the post-KAS average of 19.6% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22) but far lower than the projected rate of 31.4% (OR: 1.96) based on the usual discard rate by KDPI relationship, suggesting clinicians and patients did not rely heavily on this single number (KDPI) in kidney-utilization decisions. Still, risk-adjusted analyses suggest the elevated discard rate was most likely attributable to the erroneously high KDPIs, not a shift in donor characteristics or random chance. The rise in discard rate was sharply higher for kidneys with inflated KDPI that crossed the 85% policy threshold (OR: 1.46; p = 0.049) versus those that did not (OR: 1.06; p = 0.631).

Changes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation One Year After KAS Implementation.

After over a decade of discussion, analysis, and consensus-building, a new kidney allocation system (KAS) was implemented on December 4, 2014. Key goals included improving longevity matching between donor kidneys and recipients and broadening access for historically disadvantaged subpopulations, in particular highly sensitized patients and those with an extended duration on dialysis but delayed referral for transplantation. To evaluate the early impact of KAS, we compared Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data 1 year before versus after implementation. The distribution of transplants across many recipient characteristics has changed markedly and suggests that in many ways the new policy is achieving its goals. Transplants in which the donor and recipient age differed by more than 30 years declined by 23%. Initial, sharp increases in transplants were observed for Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody 99-100% recipients and recipients with at least 10 years on dialysis, with a subsequent tapering of transplants to these groups suggesting bolus effects. Although KAS has arguably increased fairness in allocation, the potential costs of broadening access must be considered. Kidneys are more often being shipped over long distances, leading to increased cold ischemic times. Delayed graft function rates have increased, but 6-month graft survival rates have not changed significantly.

Detection of HLA IgG antibodies by two enzyme-linked immunoassays, solubilized HLA class I and PRA-STAT. Comparison with the AHG PRA.

HLA class I-directed IgG antibodies have traditionally been detected with a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDL) technique. We have evaluated two solid-phase enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) and compared them with the CDL antihuman globulin (AHG) dithiothreitol-treated (DTT) PRA in their ability to discriminate between the presence or absence of HLA class I-directed IgG antibodies in serum from patients awaiting transplantation. The EIA were: (1) an EIA that uses solubilized HLA class I antigens (sHLA-I) isolated from a 240-member platelet donor pool, and (2) the PRA-STAT ELISA kit. For the first comparison, we used 691 serum samples from 272 patients taken before they had been transplanted. The data show a significant (P < 0.0001) linear correlation (r = 0.77 between the AHG DTT PRA and the sHLA EIA. They also demonstrate that the mean sHLA-I EIA ratio significantly increases (P < 0.01) above background levels with each stepwise increase in AHG DTT PRA level. Discordant results were 1.0% (7/691) for sHLA-I EIA+ PRA- and 6.3% (44/691) for PRA+ sHLA-I EIA-. However, a lower correlation was noted between the AHG DTT PRA and the PRA-STAT (Nextran) PRA results (n = 230; r = 0.42). The sHLA-I EIA is able to determine whether or not HLA Class I IgG antibodies are present in serum from transplant candidates and is an appropriate adjunct to the traditional CDL PRA assay, whereas the PRA-STAT is not.

HLA-DR and DQ typing by polymerase chain reaction using sequence-specific primer mixes reduces the incidence of phenotypic homozygosity (blanks) over serology.

Because of the inherent difficulties in allele assignment with HLA-DR serological typing, in 1993 our organ procurement organization-based HLA laboratory replaced serology with the molecular method of polymerase chain reaction using sequence-specific primer mixes (PCR-SSP) to type for DR and DQ at a resolution level equivalent to that of serologically defined antigens. In this study, we compared the incidence of DR blanks, where allocative homozygosity occurred, and graft outcome during our serology epoch (1987-1993) with that of our molecular epoch (1993-1996). The incidence of DR blanks by PCR-SSP (17.0%; 138/1101) was significantly lower (P<0.005) than in the serology epoch (21.5%; 569/2647). Although DQ is not a component of the allocation algorithm, the incidence of blanks in the molecular era (21.9%; 196/895) was 46% lower (P<0.001) than in the serology epoch (40.8%; 931/2277). Graft survival in 163 cadaveric renal transplant recipients for whom molecular DR allocation occurred (patient and donor were molecularly typed) showed that PCR-SSP typing had no significant effect on 2.5-year graft survival for patients mismatched for 0 (97%), 1 (90%), or 2 (94%) HLA-DR antigens (P=0.4; log-rank). In conclusion, molecular typing lowered the rate of DR and DQ blanks, but molecular matching for HLA DR and DQ did not influence graft outcome at 2.5 years.

Long-term graft survival is improved in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow cytometric crossmatching.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric renal retransplantation is associated with a higher risk of early graft failure than primary grafts. A large proportion of those graft losses is likely attributable to donor-directed HLA class I antibodies, detectable by flow cytometry cross-matching but not by conventional crossmatching techniques. METHODS: Long-term graft survival in a group of 106 recipients of consecutive cadaveric renal regrafts between 1990 and 1997, in whom a negative flow T-cell IgG crossmatch was required for transplantation, was compared with two other groups of cadaveric transplant recipients. The first group consisted of 174 cadaveric regrafts transplanted between 1985 and 1995 using only a negative anti-human globulin (AHG) T-cell IgG crossmatch. The second group was primary cadaveric transplants done concurrently with the flow group (1990 to 1997) using only the AHG T-cell IgG crossmatch. RESULTS: The long-term (7 year) graft survival rate of flow crossmatch-selected regraft recipients (68%; n= 106) was significantly improved over that of regraft recipients who were selected for transplantation by only the AHG crossmatch technique (45%; n=174; log-rank=0.001; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Graft outcome for the flow cross-matched regraft recipients was not significantly different from that of primary cadaveric patients (72%; n=889; log-rank=0.2; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Finally, a positive B-cell IgG flow cytometric crossmatch had no influence on long-term regraft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the flow T-cell IgG cross-match as the exclusion criterion for cadaveric renal retransplantation yields an improved long-term graft outcome over that obtained when only the AHG cross-match is used and has improved survival of regraft recipients to the level of our primary cadaveric renal transplant population.

Cold ischemia time: an independent predictor of increased HLA class I antibody production after rejection of a primary cadaveric renal allograft.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric kidneys experiencing longer cold ischemia time (CIT) are associated with higher levels of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and early graft loss. One mechanism to explain these results is that ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury makes the allograft more immunogenic by upregulating molecules involved in the immune response (e.g., HLA Class I/II). METHODS: We evaluated the influence of CIT on the production of HLA Class I antibody level, measured by an antihuman globulin panel reactive antibody (AHG PRA) level, in 90 unsensitized recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants (from a total of 1442 between 1985 and 1997) who rejected their kidneys. RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, a CIT of 15 hr or more (vs. < 15 hr) independently increased the risk of the AHG Class I PRA level being > or = 20% after unsensitized patients rejected their first kidneys (relative risk=3.57; 95% confidence interval=1.26 to 10.14; P=0.01), despite the same degree of Class I/II mismatch between the two CIT groups. The overall mean peak PRA level after primary kidney rejection was significantly lower for the CIT < 15 hr group (25.9%+/-33.9; n=24) compared with the CIT > or = 15 hr group (46.3%+/-36.5; n=66) (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Longer CIT induces a humorally more immunogenic kidney.

Influence of the Rh (D) blood group system on graft survival in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Rh (D) blood group system has not traditionally been considered to be a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier in transplantation since conflicting results of its clinical importance have been reported. METHODS: We analyzed 786 consecutive primary cadaveric renal transplants performed by transplant centers in our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) between 1990 and 1997. We also analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on 26,469 kidney transplants done from April 1994 to June 1996. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that Rh identity between the recipient and donor was significantly related to better graft outcome (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.61; P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis of the UNOS data revealed that the Rh -/- group may have a positive influence on graft survival with a risk ratio of 0.43 (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis of primary cadaveric renal allografts performed within the Midwest Organ Bank OPO indicates that Rh (D) is a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier that influences 7-year graft survival.

Transplantation rate of the blood group B waiting list is increased by using A2 and A2B kidneys.

BACKGROUND: We have increased the transplantation rate for blood group B cadaveric waiting list candidates by transplanting them with A2 and A2B kidneys. METHODS: Since 1991, five of the seven renal transplant programs in our organ procurement organization service area have preferentially transplanted blood group A2 and A2B cadaveric kidneys to B blood group waiting list candidates with histories of low anti-A isoagglutinin titers. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1997, these five centers performed transplantations on 71 patients from the B cadaveric waiting list. Of those 71 patients, 29% (21 of 71) underwent transplantation with either A2 (n=18) or A2B (n=3) cadaveric kidneys. In 1997 alone, 48% (11 of 23) of the B patient transplant recipients received A2 or A2B kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of A2 and A2B kidneys into B waiting list patients has successfully increased access of B patients to kidneys. Such an allocation algorithm implemented nationally may similarly increase the transplantation rate of B waiting list candidates.

Ten-year experience in transplantation of A2 kidneys into B and O recipients.

BACKGROUND: This article summarizes our 10-year multicenter experience with transplantation of 50 blood group A2 and A2B kidneys into B and O patients. METHODS: Since 1986, we have transplanted kidneys from 46 cadaver donors and 4 living donors who were blood group A2 (47 donors) or A2B (3 donors) into 19 B and 31 O patients. In 1991, we began allocating these kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients who were selected based on a history of low (< or =4) anti-A IgG isoagglutinin titers. Immunosuppression was no different from that used in ABO-compatible grafts. RESULTS: The 1-month function rate before thus selecting the patients was 68% (19/28), but is now 94% (17/18). Two-year cadaver-donor graft survival with this selection method is 94%, compared with 88% for 640 concurrent and consecutive ABO-compatible transplants (log-rank, 0.15). All four living-related transplants are still functioning, with a mean follow-up of 71 months. Since we began allocating A2 kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients, the percentage of the B patients who received A2 or A2B kidneys has increased from 29% (8/28) to 55% (10/18). CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of A2 or A2B kidneys into B and O patients is clinically equivalent to that of ABO-compatible transplantation when recipients are selected by low pretransplant anti-A titer histories. This approach increases access of blood group B recipients to kidneys.

Role of surgical and percutaneous drainage in the treatment of abdominal abscesses.

Reviewing our experience with 32 surgically and 13 percutaneously drained abdominal abscesses, we propose the following criteria for computed tomography (CT)-assisted percutaneous drainage: (1) the absence of more than two abscess cavities or loculations; (2) drainage route not traversing bowel, uncontaminated organs, or uncontaminated peritoneal or pleural spaces; (3) the absence of a source of continuous contamination; and (4) the absence of fungi as causative organisms. Of nine abscesses that met these criteria, seven were successfully drained percutaneously. In all abscesses that did not meet the criteria, percutaneous drainage resulted in complications. Of the 32 surgical patients, six would have been candidates for percutaneous drainage according to these criteria. Two of those patients experienced technical complications that might have been prevented by the use of percutaneous drainage. Surgical intervention is the preferred treatment in the majority of patients; however, in properly selected patients, CT-assisted percutaneous drainage is highly successful and can prevent unnecessary morbidity and mortality.

Improved graft survival in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow crossmatching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of flow cytometry cross-matching on graft survival in patients undergoing cadaveric renal retransplantation compared with our conventional antihuman globulin cytotoxic crossmatch. DESIGN: In 1990, 6 of 7 transplantation centers in 1 organ procurement organization service area began performing cadaveric renal retransplantation only if the flow T-cell IgG crossmatch was negative. During that period, 1 center continued to use only the antihuman globulin T-cell IgG crossmatch. Prior to 1990, all centers used only the antihuman globulin T-cell IgG crossmatch as their crossmatch selection criterion for retransplantation. Regraft survival was compared between those centers by crossmatch selection criteria. PATIENTS: Patient selection and immunosuppression decisions were made at the transplantation center. SETTING: All flow cytometry crossmatches for all 7 centers participating in the evaluation were performed at the Histocompatibility Laboratory of the Midwest Organ Bank Inc, Westwood, Kan. RESULTS: Graft survival is significantly better (P = .03 [logrank test]) in regrafts when the flow crossmatch is used to select patients for transplantation. CONCLUSION: Flow crossmatching improves graft survival in cadaveric renal retransplantation by identifying a subset of patients with donor-directed HLA class I antibodies that are not detectable by our conventional antihuman globulin crossmatch.