Is routine omentectomy of grossly normal omentum helpful in surgery for ovarian cancer? A look at the tumor microenvironment and its clinical implications.

Ovarian cancer is uncommon in relation to other women's cancer, however, it is associated with a disproportionate number of deaths due to women's cancer. According to the National Institute of Health, only 1.2% of new cancer diagnoses in the United States are attributed to ovarian cancer, yet it is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women and is responsible for 2.3% of all female cancer deaths. Ovarian cancer deaths are largely due to widely metastatic and chemoresistant disease that often presents at a late stage. The omentum is one of the most common sites for ovarian cancer metastasis. Recent research findings have highlighted the specific tumor microenvironment of the omentum and how it can be manipulated to prevent ovarian cancer proliferation, metastasis and chemoresistance. Debulking surgery has been the mainstay in the treatment for ovarian cancer. Total omentectomy is classically described as essential to this procedure. This article explores the known benefits of total omentectomy in the surgical treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer as well as the potential benefit contained within the omental tumor microenvironment when the omentum is macroscopically free of disease at the time of initial surgery.

Epigenetic Therapy Augments Classic Chemotherapy in Suppressing the Growth of 3D High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Spheroids over an Extended Period of Time.

Recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is clinically very challenging and prematurely shortens patients' lives. Recurrent ovarian cancer is characterized by high tumor heterogeneity; therefore, it is susceptible to epigenetic therapy in classic 2D tissue culture and rodent models. Unfortunately, this success has not translated well into clinical trials. Utilizing a 3D spheroid model over a period of weeks, we were able to compare the efficacy of classic chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy on recurrent ovarian cancer cells. Unexpectedly, in our model, a single dose of paclitaxel alone caused the exponential growth of recurrent high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer over a period of weeks. In contrast, this effect is not only opposite under treatment with panobinostat, but panobinostat reverses the repopulation of cancer cells following paclitaxel treatment. In our model, we also demonstrate differences in the drug-treatment sensitivity of classic chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy. Moreover, 3D-derived ovarian cancer cells demonstrate induced proliferation, migration, invasion, cancer colony formation and chemoresistance properties after just a single exposure to classic chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence demonstrating a critical contrast between short and prolonged post-treatment outcomes following classic chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy in recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer in 3D culture.

Treatment With Mifepristone Allows a Patient With End-stage Pancreatic Cancer in Hospice on a Morphine Drip to Restore a Decent Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that a unique immunomodulatory protein, known as the progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF), is utilized by a large variety of cancers to escape immune surveillance. Mifepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist/modulator, anecdotally, has been found to increase both length and quality of life in many different types of advanced cancers. CASE REPORT: Though there was one previous case of pancreatic cancer that showed a significant reduction in pain for the one month she took mifepristone before changing to an experimental drug, the case presented here provided much greater evidence that this drug can markedly improve both length and quality of life, in at least some patients, with very advanced pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION: It is hoped that this case report will influence others to prescribe mifepristone off-label and hopefully substantiate this finding of marked palliative benefit in the majority of a larger series of patients.

Paclitaxel poliglumex and carboplatin as first-line therapy in ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer: a phase I and feasibility trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX) in combination with carboplatin in patients with chemotherapy-naive ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer, and to assess the feasibility of administering multiple cycles of this regimen. METHODS: The first 11 patients were treated in a standard 3 + 3 dose-seeking design, with carboplatin held constant at area under the curve (AUC) of 6 and PPX at 225, 175 or 135 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetics of PPX and carboplatin were evaluated during this dose-seeking component of the trial. MTD was defined by acute dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in the first cycle. Twenty additional evaluable patients were treated at the estimated MTD to assess the feasibility of this regimen over >or=4cycles. RESULTS: PPX at 225 mg/m(2) resulted in DLT in 2/3 patients, and was de-escalated first to 175 mg/m(2) and then to 135 mg/m(2). PPX slowly hydrolyzed to paclitaxel and did not alter the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin. DLT within the first 4-cycles were observed in 3 patients (15%) treated at the MTD: neutropenia > 2weeks (2), febrile neutropenia (1). Nineteen patients (95%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Sixteen patients (80%) had at least one episode of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Three patients (15%) had grade 2 and one had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Complete response by CA-125 was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of PPX of 135 mg/m(2) with carboplatin (AUC = 6) in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer was feasible for multiple cycles, but hematologic toxicity was greater compared with standard carboplatin and 3-hour paclitaxel.