A Proposal for a New Index to Quantify the Ratio of Near and Far Spatial Neglect Using Immersive Virtual Reality Technology: A Technical Report.

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is defined as impaired attention to sensory stimuli on one side, which can exist for near and far spaces combined or independently. Thus, quantifying both near- and far-space neglect is crucial. This study aims to propose an index to quantify the near/far spatial neglect ratio to describe the USN symptoms' characteristics in each patient using immersive virtual reality (VR) technology. An object-detecting task was performed for five USN patients in a three-dimensional VR space. The examiner recorded the positional data of the objects that were recognized by the USN patient using coordinate data. The near/far ratio (NFRatio) was calculated using the proposed equation to quantify the difference in neglect severity in near and far spaces of each patient. Among the patients, four tended to have greater far-space neglect, and one tended to have greater near-space neglect. Moreover, the near/far spatial neglect ratio was shown to vary according to height. This is the first study to propose immersive VR to quantify the near and far spatial neglect. However, further study is needed to assess its reliability and validity and describe its clinical usability. Clinical Relevance- In clinical practice USN symptoms cause neglected symptoms in 3D space so the proposed system will be of high clinical significance if 3D assessment is realized.

The influence of a vibrotactile biofeedback system on postural dynamics during single-leg standing in healthy older adults.

The effectiveness of sensory substitution technology, such as haptic-based vibrotactile biofeedback (VBF), has been verified for balance training and rehabilitation. However, whether VBF training changes postural dynamics in older people remains unknown. This study investigated the influence of VBF training on postural dynamics during single-leg standing in older adults, using detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Twenty older adults participated in this study. Measurement of postural sway comprised three phases: first measurement session as a baseline test, postural training (day 1), and second measurement session (day 2). The BF group received BF training during the balance training session, while the control group practiced single-leg stance without BF. The center of pressure (CoP) trajectory was recorded in the first measurement session (pre) and second measurement session (post) at 50 Hz. DFA revealed the presence of two linear scaling regions in the CoP, indicating the presence of fast- and slow-scale fluctuations. For the BF group, slow-scale postural dynamics revealed more anti-persistent behavior after training in the anterior-posterior direction. However, the control group showed a change toward more random dynamics after training. These different influences suggest that the BF system might improve error correction strategies during single-leg standing for older adults, while single-leg standing training without the BF system might cause the loss of controllability in single-leg standing. Further, the results of the DFA are discussed in the context of balance training using VBF.