Factors associated with 90-day reintervention following lower extremity revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) represents a high-volume, high-cost burden on the health care system. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has developed the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced program, in which a single payment is provided for all services administered in a postsurgical 90-day episode of care. Factors associated with 30- and 90-day reinterventions after PAD interventions would represent useful data for both payors and stake holders. METHODS: We conducted a national cohort study of adults 65 years and older in the Vascular Quality Initiative and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked dataset who underwent an open, endovascular, or hybrid revascularization procedure for PAD between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Procedures for acute limb ischemia and aneurysms were excluded. The primary outcome was 90-day reintervention. Reintervention at 30 days was a secondary outcome. Covariates of interest included demographics, comorbidities, and patient- and facility-level characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the association between patient- and facility-level characteristics and the risk of 30- and 90-day reinterventions. RESULTS: Among 42,429 patients (71.3% endovascular, 23.3% open, and 5.4% hybrid), median age was 74 years (interquartile range, 69-80 years), 57.9% were male, and 84.3% were White. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was the operative indication in 40.4% of the procedures. Overall, 42.8% were completed in the outpatient setting (40.3% outpatient, 2.5% office-based lab). Over 70% of procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia were completed as inpatient, whereas 60% of the claudication interventions were done as outpatient. The 90-day reintervention rate was 14.5%, and the 30-day reintervention rate was 5.5%. Compared with inpatient procedures, PAD interventions completed in the outpatient or office-based lab setting had significantly higher 90- and 30-day reintervention rates (reference, inpatient; outpatient 90-day reintervention: hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.60; outpatient 30-day reintervention: HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.62-2.24; office-based lab 90-day reintervention: HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.82-2.41; office-based lab 30-day reintervention: HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 3.17-3.94). Open and hybrid approaches demonstrated lower risk of reintervention compared with endovascular procedures at 30 and 90 days and, compared with aortoiliac disease, all other anatomic segments of disease were associated with higher 90-day reintervention, but no difference was noted at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although outpatient PAD interventions may be convenient for patients and providers, the outpatient setting is associated with a significant risk of subsequent reintervention. Additional work is needed to understand how to improve the longevity of outpatient PAD interventions.

Prosthetic fitting and mortality after major lower extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that ambulation after major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is low and mortality after LEA is high. Successful prosthetic fitting after LEA has a significant quality of life benefit; however, it is unclear if there are benefits in post-LEA mortality. Our objective was to examine a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent LEA and determine if there is an association between fitting for a prosthetic and mortality. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent LEA between 2015 and 2022 at two academic health care systems in a large metropolitan city. The exposure of interest was prosthetic fitting after LEA. The primary outcomes were mortality within 1 and 3 years of follow-up. Ambulation after LEA was defined as being ambulatory with or without an assistive device. Patients with prior LEA were excluded. Extended Cox models with time-dependent exposure were used to evaluate the association between prosthetic fitting and mortality at 1 and 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Among 702 patients who underwent LEA, the mean (SD) age was 64.3 (12.6) years and 329 (46.6%) were fitted for prosthetic. The study population was mostly male (n = 488, 69.5%), predominantly non-Hispanic Black (n = 410, 58.4%), and nearly one-fifth were non-ambulatory before LEA (n = 139 [19.8%]). Of note, 14.3% of all subjects who were nonambulatory at some point after LEA, and 28.5% of patients not ambulatory preoperatively were eventually ambulatory after LEA. The rate of death among those fitted for a prosthetic was 12.0/100 person-years at 1 year and 5.8/100 person-years at 3 years of follow-up; among those not fitted for a prosthetic, the rate of death was 55.7/100 person-years and 50.7/100 person-years at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. After adjusting for several sociodemographic data points, comorbidities, pre- or post- coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic timeframe, and procedural factors, prosthetic fitting is associated with decreased likelihood of mortality within 1 year of follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.40) as well as within 3 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic fitting is associated with improved survival, and preoperative functional status does not always predict postoperative functional status. Characterizing patient, surgical, and rehabilitation factors associated with receipt of prosthetic after LEA may improve long-term survival in these patients. Process measures employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, such as prosthetic department evaluation of all amputees, may represent a best practice.

Female patients have fewer limb amputations compared to male patients in the BEST-CLI trial.

OBJECTIVE: Female patients are less likely to be diagnosed with and treated for peripheral artery disease. When treated, there are also reported sex disparities in short- and long-term outcomes. We designed this study to compare outcomes after open and endovascular revascularization in the Best Endovascular vs best Surgical Therapy in patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial between females and males, and to examine outcomes of each revascularization type in an all-female cohort. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 of the BEST-CLI Trial, patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing open surgical bypass (with or without adequate conduit) and endovascular therapy were stratified by sex. In addition, in a female-only cohort, we evaluated differences in outcomes between treatment arm (combined all bypasses from cohorts 1 and 2 and compared with all endovascular treatment in cohorts 1 and 2). Outcomes included major amputation, reintervention, major adverse limb event (MALE, a composite of major amputation and reintervention), all-cause death, and composite outcome of MALE or all-cause death. Univariable and adjusted Cox regressions were used to assess outcome between males and females. Similar methods were used to assess differences in outcomes between treatment arm in females. RESULTS: Among 1830 patients, females were significantly underrepresented, comprising only 28% (n = 519) of the BEST-CLI cohort. Overall, the characteristics of females enrolled in the trial had some differences compared with males: females were more likely to have rest pain alone (72% vs 60%; P < .0001) and when presenting with an ischemic wound, were less likely to have a wound infection (38% vs 47%; P = .01). Females were less likely to have an adequate single-segment greater saphenous vein (SSGSV) available (82% vs 89%; P = .01). Controlled for baseline clinical factors, at 1 year, females had significantly lower rates of major limb amputation compared with males (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; P = .023), which drove better amputation- and MALE-free survival rates. All-cause death at 1 year was not statistically different between sexes (11.8% vs 11.2%; P = .286). In the all-female cohort, results paralleled the overall trial; open surgical bypass (with any conduit) had significantly better outcomes compared with endovascular therapy. Specifically, among females undergoing endovascular therapy, the rate of major reintervention was particularly high compared with females undergoing open surgical bypass (24.8% vs 10.5%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being underrepresented in BEST-CLI, the primary results of the trial, namely, improved MALE-free survival with open surgical bypass with SSGSV, were mirrored in the all-female subset. Female patients enrolled in BEST-CLI had better amputation-free survival at 1 year compared with male patients. These findings suggest that in treating female patients with CLTI considered appropriate for both open and endovascular revascularization, surgical bypass with optimal conduit is the preferred treatment option and can potentially ameliorate poor limb preservation outcomes associated with sex.

Evaluating Receipt of Optimal Medical Therapy Among Structurally Disadvantaged Groups Undergoing Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with decreased major amputation and mortality. OMT has several components, including antiplatelet and high-intensity statin therapy, blood pressure control, etc. While there are disparities in receipt of OMT among PAD patients, it is unknown if patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods, measured by the area deprivation index (ADI), are less likely to be on OMT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients that underwent major lower extremity amputation between 2015 and 2019 at 2 large academic healthcare systems. Primary exposure was high ADI, defined as ADI ≥60th percentile, and secondary exposure was non-Hispanic Black (NHB) race. For each analysis, the primary outcome of interest was receipt of OMT, defined here as at least one antiplatelet agent and a high-intensity statin. The exposure outcome relationship was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 354 patients with median age of 66 (interquartile range [IQR] 58-74), 267 (75.4%) were male, 219 (61.9%) identified as NHB and 116 (32.8%) as non-Hispanic White (NHW). Overall, 91 (25.7%) patients were on OMT at time of amputation despite 57.3% of the cohort being established with a vascular surgeon. Compared to those with low ADI, the category high ADI had a higher proportion of NHB patients (48.1% vs 70.3%, P = 0.001) and patients were more often hospitalized at the University-affiliated facilities (47.4% vs 63.0%, P = 0.004). High ADI was not associated with receipt of OMT prior to major amputation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.24). In secondary analysis, NHB race was not associated with receipt of OMT. Stratification by facility type (Veterans Affairs and University-affiliated facilities) also showed no association between high ADI or race and receipt of OMT. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood economic well-being is not associated with receipt of OMT prior to major amputation. While the absence of socioeconomic disparities is notable, the proportion of patients on OMT is suboptimal. Care processes should be critically evaluated and quality measures potentially created to improve the rate of receipt of OMT among patients at risk for amputation.

Exploring how military culture shapes veterans' perception of aortic aneurysm repair: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Veterans represent a distinct cultural group whose perceptions of illness and treatment are influenced by military culture. The study explores how prior military service shapes Veterans' assumptions and behaviors in the setting of aneurysm repair surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted content and thematic analysis of a case series of 10 transcripts from telephone interviews with older (76.7 ± 4.3 years) African American and White male Veterans now residing in the Southern U.S. who underwent open or endovascular aneurysm surgery at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers or university affiliates between 2004 and2019. RESULTS: Throughout the continuum of care, Veterans described deferring to authority and not questioning provider's decisions ["I just can't make a judgment on that, because I'm not a doctor"]. Veterans valued commitment and articulated pride in keeping logistically challenging surveillance appointments [I always took them very seriously. . . If I'm scheduled for something by the doctor, I always make it."]. The routine structure of VA care aligned with Veterans military experiences, facilitating compliance with doctor's orders. However, procedural deviations in VA care were disconcerting for patients ["They haven't reached out to me in at least three years, since my surgery; I was being seen once a year and then all of a sudden, they just quit."]. While Veterans praised VA care, they exhibited sensitivity to signs of untoward treatment from clinical and support staff "…my surgeon, he never talked to me before, nor after, no anytime…I thought that maybe that wasn't right". CONCLUSIONS: Military culture embodies rank, order, and respect, and remains a source of strength and stability for Veterans in their medical care late in life. Cultural competency about how military service has shaped Veterans' expectations can enhance providers' awareness of patients' military mindsets and inform surgeons' efforts to engage Veterans in shared decision making.

An Overview of Telehealth in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Telehealth enables the remote delivery of health care through telecommunication technologies and has substantially affected the evolving medical landscape. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the utilization of telehealth as health care professionals were forced to limit face-to-face in-person visits. It has been shown that information delivery, diagnosis, disease monitoring, and follow-up care can be conducted remotely, resulting in considerable changes specific to cardiovascular disease management. Despite increasing telehealth utilization, several factors such as technological infrastructure, reimbursement, and limited patient digital literacy can hinder the adoption of remote care. This scientific statement reviews definitions pertinent to telehealth discussions, summarizes the effect of telehealth utilization on cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease care, and identifies obstacles to the adoption of telehealth that need to be addressed to improve health care accessibility and equity.

Advancing Peripheral Artery Disease Quality of Care and Outcomes Through Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is chronic in nature, and individualized chronic disease management is a central focus of care. To accommodate this reality, tools to measure the impact and quality of the PAD care delivered are necessary. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and instruments to measure them, that is, PRO measures, have been well studied in the research and clinical trial context, but a shift toward integrating them into clinical practice has yet to take place. A framework to use PRO measures as indicators of the quality of PAD care delivered, that is, PRO performance measures (PRO-PMs), is provided in this scientific statement. Measurement goals to consider by PAD clinical phenotypes are provided, as well as an overview of potential benefits of adopting PRO-PMs in the clinical practice of PAD care, including reducing unwanted variability and promoting health equity. A central discussion with considerations for risk adjustment of PRO-PMs, individualized PAD care, and the need for patient engagement strategies is offered. Furthermore, necessary conditions in terms of required competencies and training to handle PRO-PM data are discussed because the interpretation and handling of these data come with great responsibility and consequences for designing care that adopts a broader framework of risk that goes beyond the inclusion of biomedical variables. To conclude, health system perspectives and an agenda to reach the next steps in the implementation of PRO-PMs in PAD care are offered.

Association between readmission care fragmentation and outcomes after interventions for peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral artery disease is complicated by the frequent need for readmission. However, it is unclear if readmission to a nonindex LER facility (ie, a facility different from the one where the LER was performed) compared with the index LER facility is associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: This was a national cohort study of older adults who underwent open, endovascular, or hybrid LER for peripheral artery disease (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018) in the Vascular Quality Initiative who were readmitted within 90 days of their vascular procedure. This dataset was linked to Medicare claims and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality and the secondary outcome was major amputation at 90 days after LER. The primary exposure was the location of the first readmission after LER (categorized as occurring at the index LER facility vs a nonindex LER facility). Generalized estimating equations logistic regression models were used to assess the association between readmission location and 90-day mortality and amputation. RESULTS: Among 42,429 patients who underwent LER, 33.0% were readmitted within 90 days. Of those who were readmitted, 27.3% were readmitted to a nonindex LER facility, and 42.2% of all readmissions were associated with procedure-related complications. Compared with patients readmitted to the index LER facility, those readmitted to a nonindex facility had a lower proportion of procedure-related reasons for readmission (21.5% vs 50.1%; P < .001). Most of the patients readmitted to a nonindex LER facility lived further than 31 miles from the index LER facility (39.2% vs 19.6%; P < .001) and were readmitted to a facility with a total bed size of <250 (60.1% vs 11.9%; P < .001). Readmission to a nonindex LER facility was not associated with 90-day mortality or 90-day amputation. However, readmission for a procedure-related complication was associated with major amputation (90-day amputation: adjusted odds ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.89-3.82). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after LER for a procedure-related complication is associated with subsequent amputation. This finding suggests that quality improvement efforts should focus on understanding various types of procedure-related failure after LER and its role in limb salvage.

Arteriovenous fistula aneurysmorrhaphy is associated with improved patency and decreased vascular access abandonment.

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) can become aneurysmal over time due to repeated cannulation and/or outflow steno-occlusive disease. The optimal surgical management of aneurysmal AVFs (aneurysmorrhaphy vs interposition graft) has remained unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review in which current procedural terminology codes were used to screen for patients who had undergone surgical treatment of aneurysmal AVFs between 2016 and 2021 at a single hospital system. The patients were included after a review of the operative reports. The cases were divided by surgical procedure (aneurysmorrhaphy vs interposition graft placement). The patients who had undergone primary AVF ligation or other types of repair were excluded. The primary outcomes were primary assisted and secondary patency, and the secondary outcome was dialysis access abandonment. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to test the association between the type of AVF aneurysm repair and the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, 6951 patients had undergone 16,190 dialysis access procedures. Of these procedures, 381 (2.4%) were related to surgical treatment of an aneurysmal AVF. We excluded 58 primary AVF ligation cases and 20 cases involving other types of repair, leaving 303 cases for analysis. These were divided into two groups: aneurysmorrhaphy (n = 123; 41%) and interposition graft (n = 180; 59%). No differences were found between the groups in male gender (68% vs 63%), hypertension (98% vs 98%), or central stenosis (14% vs 22%). The patients who had undergone aneurysmorrhaphy were younger (median age, 54 years vs 59 years); had had a lower rate of diabetes (41% vs 59%), coronary artery disease (41% vs 58%), and congestive heart failure (41% vs 55%); and were less likely to have undergone upper arm access (72% vs 92%). The median follow-up was 11.1 months (interquartile range, 3.6-25.2 months). No differences were found in the incidence of 30-day wound complications (1% vs 3%) or surgical site infections (4% vs 6%). On multivariable Cox regression, interposition graft placement was associated with the loss of primary assisted patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-4.95), loss of secondary patency (aHR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.21-7.94), and abandonment of dialysis access (aHR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.61-5.87; P < .05 for all) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: AVF aneurysmorrhaphy was associated with improved primary assisted and secondary patency and decreased abandonment of dialysis access. We suggest using aneurysmorrhaphy when AVF aneurysms are indicated for repair. However, individual factors such as patient comorbidities, AVF anatomy, remaining dialysis access options, and patient preference should be considered when planning the surgical approach.

Patient-level and external factors in the use of drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents in femoropopliteal endovascular interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) have been rapidly adopted for femoropopliteal endovascular interventions due to their favorable patency rates. It is unclear whether choice of using drug coated devices versus bare metal stents (BMS) or plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) as primary treatment in femoropopliteal disease is mostly associated with patient-level factors, safety concerns, or by operator preferences. This study sought to evaluate factors associated with their use in a contemporary dataset. METHODS: All femoropopliteal lesions treated with endovascular interventions between 2016 and 2019 from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry were included. For each procedure, a primary treatment was identified based on the following hierarchy: DES > DCB > BMS > POBA. A hierarchical logistic regression model predicting DCB or DES use included patient-level characteristics, key events (period after Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement change, January 2018 [vs before] and period after Katsanos meta-analysis December 2018 [vs before]), and random effects for site and operator. Operator-level variability for DCB and DES use was summarized with an adjusted median odds ratio (MOR). RESULTS: A total of 57,753 femoropopliteal endovascular procedures were included. Poor functional status (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.94), prior anticoagulant use (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97), higher Rutherford classification (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88), chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98), and the period after the Katsanos meta-analysis publication (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.29-0.32) were associated with a lower odds of DCB or DES use; whereas female sex (OR, 1.12; 95% CI,1.08-1.17), prior lesion treatment (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22), diabetes (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12), Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus class B (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.24) and C (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), and the period after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement change (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14) were associated with a higher odds of DCB or DES use. Significant variability in use was found across operators (adjusted MOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.55-2.85) and centers (adjusted MOR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.50-3.27). CONCLUSIONS: DCB or DES use in femoropopliteal disease demonstrates wide variability across operators and is linked strongly with external factors, followed by anatomic lesion characteristics and a history of previous interventions. Future work needs to focus on tailoring DCB or DES use to patient and lesion characteristics and to develop appropriate use guidelines integrating these factors.

Short-Term Concerns Primarily Determine Patient Preference for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair may be performed through open or endovascular approaches, but the factors influencing a patient's repair-type preference are not well characterized. Here we performed a qualitative analysis to better understand factors influencing patient preference within the Preference for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of AAA Trial. METHODS: Open-ended responses regarding primary (n = 21) and secondary (n = 47) factors influencing patient preference underwent qualitative analysis using the constant comparative method with iterative reviews. Codes were used to generate themes and themes grouped into categories, with each step conducted via consensus agreement between three researchers. Relative prevalence of themes were compared to ascertain trends in patient preference. RESULTS: Patient responses regarding both primary and secondary factors fell into four categories: Short-term concerns, long-term concerns, advice & experience, and other. Patients most frequently described short-term concerns (23) as their primary influence, with themes including post-op complications, hospitalization & recovery, and intraoperative concerns. Long-term concerns were more prevalent (20) as secondary factors, which included themes such as survival, and chronic management. The average age of patients voicing only long-term concerns as a primary factor was 11 years younger than those listing only short-term concerns. CONCLUSION: Short-term concerns relating to the procedure and recovery are more often the primary factor influencing patient preference, while long term concerns play a more secondary role. Long-term concerns are more often a primary factor in younger patients. Vascular surgeons should consider this information in shared decision making to reach an optimal outcome.

The Impact of Work Status and Age in Choosing Type of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated decision aid to enable better alignment between patient preference and their ultimate repair. We sought to determine the key factors influencing the decision-making of veterans for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: A total of 235 veterans in the PROVE-AAA trial were asked their information sources regarding repairs, employment status, and preferred intervention. Answers were coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis to generate nonoverlapping themes, then stratified by employment status. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (17.8% of enrollees) provided their source of information for OSR prior to using a decision aid. 81% of retired veterans were greater than 70 y old, while 58% of nonretired veterans were greater than 70 (P = 0.003). The most common information source was from a vascular surgeon/professional or unspecified MD/other health professionals (51.4%), while sources from outside this group made up the remaining 48.5%. The most preferred procedure was EVAR. However, nonretired individuals were more likely to prefer OSR. These data on information source and preferred procedure were similar in patients who provided their source for EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans in the PROVE-AAA study were more likely to be retired and more likely to rely on information from an unspecified MD/other health professionals for EVAR. Although both retired and nonretired veterans preferred EVAR the most, nonretired veterans were more likely to prefer OSR despite being younger.

Moving forward: Recommendations to overcome existing structural racism.

A critical need exists to address structural racism within academic and community medicine and surgery and determine methods that will serve to repair its long-standing effects and alleviate the associated negative consequences. Because of our broad skillset and the populations we serve, vascular surgeons are uniquely positioned to identify and address the effects of structural racism in our places of work and for the populations we treat. Our goal is to discuss the effects of racism on healthcare outcomes and provide recommendations on how to combat these through equitable practices such as the diversification of the vascular surgery workforce, inclusivity as partners and leaders, and the promotion of improved outcomes among our most vulnerable patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. It is imperative that we stand for antiracism within our field through our societies, journals, clinical trials, training programs, clinical practice groups, and leadership.

Quality-of-life assessment as an outcomes measure in critical limb ischemia.

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a diagnosis plagued by significant comorbidity and high mortality rates. Overall survival remains poor in this population regardless of the procedure-related success as demonstrated by freedom from amputation, intervention, and patency. The literature has traditionally focused on physician-centered and lesion-centered outcomes with regards to limb salvage procedures, but there remains a relative paucity of studies of CLI patients describing patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life (QoL), independent living, and ambulation status. Review of the available literature indicates patients do not always experience significant gains in their QoL after limb salvage interventions, despite reasonable graft patency, amputation-free survival, and limb salvage rates. Further research is required using QoL tools in a measurable and clinically relevant fashion to guide optimal quality care that maximizes patient-centered outcomes.

Distal Radial Artery Embolization: An Alternative Approach towards Access Preservation and Limb Salvage in Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulae Complicated by Steal Syndrome.

The incidence of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae complicated by ischemic steal syndrome is low; however, its sequelae can be quite devastating. Traditional management includes open ligation of the distal radial artery. This series details 4 cases of successful embolization of the distal radial artery for flow interruption to treat ischemic steal syndrome and salvage functional dialysis access. For radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae complicated by steal syndrome, distal radial artery endovascular coil embolization is a valuable treatment strategy.