Safety, immunogenicity & effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant global morbidity and mortality. As the vaccination was rolled out with prioritization on healthcare workers (HCWs), it was desirable to generate evidence on effectiveness of vaccine in prevailing real-life situation for policy planning. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: This prospective observational study was undertaken on the safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of the ChAdOx1 nCoV- 19 coronavirus vaccine (Recombinant) during the national vaccine roll out in January-March 2021, in a tertiary care hospital, New Delhi, India. RESULTS: The vaccine was found to be safe, with local pain, fever and headache as the most common adverse events of milder nature which generally lasted for two days. The adverse events following vaccination were lower in the second dose as compared to the first dose. The vaccine was immunogenic, with seropositivity, which was 51 per cent before vaccination, increasing to 77 per cent after single dose and 98 per cent after two doses. Subgroup analysis indicated that those with the past history of COVID-19 attained seropositivity of 98 per cent even with single dose. The incidence of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR positive COVID-19 was significantly lower among vaccinated (11.7%) as compared to unvaccinated (22.2%). Seven cases of moderate COVID-19 needing hospitalization were seen in the unvaccinated and only one such in the vaccinated group. The difference was significant between the fully vaccinated (10.8%) and the partially vaccinated (12.7%). The hazard of COVID-19 infection was higher among male, age >50 yr and clinical role in the hospital. After adjustment for these factors, the hazard of COVID-19 infection among unvaccinated was 2.09 as compared to fully vaccinated. Vaccine effectiveness was 52.2 per cent in HCWs. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus vaccine (Recombinant) was safe, immunogenic as well as showed effectiveness against the COVID-19 disease (CTRI/2021/01/030582).

Seroprevalence of Covid-19 infection among healthcare workers: A study from a tertiary care hospital in the National Capital Region of India.

Background Seroprevalence studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can provide information on the target populations for vaccination. We aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence among healthcare workers (HCWs) at our tertiary care institution and to identify parameters that may affect it. Method We assessed seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by the chemiluminescence immunoassay test among 3258 HCW in our hospital and evaluated as per gender, age, their previous Covid-19 diagnosis, role in hospital and type/risk of exposure. Results Of 3258 participants, 46.2% (95% CI 44.4%- 47.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (i.e. IgG ≥15 AU/ml). Higher seroprevalence was seen in non-clinical HCWs (50.2%) than in clinical HCWs (41.4%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, people with a history of Covid-19 were found to have significantly higher antibody levels (p=0.0001). Among the HCWs, doctors and nurses had lower relative risk (RR) of acquiring Covid-19 infection (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.76-0.89) compared to non-clinical HCWs. Conclusion Seroprevalence in HCWs at our hospital was 46.2%. Clinical HCWs had lower seroprevalence compared to non-clinical HCWs. Previous history of Covid-19 almost doubled the seropositivity, particularly in those with current infection.

Evaluation of T and B cell immunophenotyping and antibody response post Covid-19 vaccination.

PURPOSE: To evaluate T and B cell subsets and IgG antibodies in response to SARS-CoV-2 post COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: A total of 50 healthy adults (18-60 years) receiving anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (COVISHIELD) were recruited for the study. Blood samples were collected from participants at 3 time points; just before vaccination (Visit 0, V0), just before booster dose (Visit 1, V1) and 6th month after 1st dose (Visit 2, V2). Peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation was done and evaluated for T and B cell subsets by Flow cytometry. Quantitative determination of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was done by Chemiluminescence immunoassay in all samples. Final data for all three visits was available for 37 participants who remained healthy. Ethics approval was obtained from Medanta Institution of Ethics Committee vide MICR No. 1290/2021 dated 24th May 2021. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 34.6 â€‹± â€‹5.7 years (Range: 24-45 years). Highly significant improvement in SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels was observed after each visit {Mean IgG: (V0 v/s. V1: 133.8 â€‹± â€‹339.2AU/ml v/s. 434.5 â€‹± â€‹519.2AU/ml; p-value â€‹= â€‹0.003) and V0 v/s. V2: 133.8 â€‹± â€‹339.2AU/ml v/s. 420.9 â€‹± â€‹394.2AU/ml; p-value â€‹= â€‹0.002) Between visits 0 and 1, the mean value for CD4 Naïve T cells showed significant increase, while CD4 central memory (CM) T cells showed significant decrease. Between visits 0 and 2 the mean values for CD4 Naïve T cells, CD8 Naïve T cells and Pre germinal centre (Pre GC) B cells showed significant increase. During the same period the mean values for CD4CM, CD8 effector memory (EM) and CD8 CM T cells showed significant decrease. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that both, humoral and cellular immunity, play an important role in maintaining immunity against COVID-19 infection, following COVISHIELD vaccination. Moreover, in subjects with normalisation of antibody levels post vaccination, persistence of T cell subsets may still offer some immunity.

Seroprevalence of Covid-19 infection among healthcare workers: A study from a tertiary care hospital in the National Capital Region of India

BACKGROUND Seroprevalence studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can provide information on the target populations for vaccination. We aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence among healthcare workers (HCWs) at our tertiary care institution and to identify parameters that may affect it. METHOD We assessed seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by the chemiluminescence immunoassay test among 3258 HCW in our hospital and evaluated as per gender, age, their previous Covid-19 diagnosis, role in hospital and type/risk of exposure. RESULTS Of 3258 participants, 46.2% (95% CI 44.4%– 47.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (i.e. IgG ?15 AU/ml). Higher seroprevalence was seen in non-clinical HCWs (50.2%) than in clinical HCWs (41.4%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, people with a history of Covid-19 were found to have significantly higher antibody levels (p=0.0001). Among the HCWs, doctors and nurses had lower relative risk (RR) of acquiring Covid-19 infection (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.76–0.89) compared to non-clinical HCWs. CONCLUSION Seroprevalence in HCWs at our hospital was 46.2%. Clinical HCWs had lower seroprevalence compared to non-clinical HCWs. Previous history of Covid-19 almost doubled the seropositivity, particularly in those with current infection.

Safety, immunogenicity & effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital

Background & objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant global morbidity and mortality. As the vaccination was rolled out with prioritization on healthcare workers (HCWs), it was desirable to generate evidence on effectiveness of vaccine in prevailing real-life situation for policy planning. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This prospective observational study was undertaken on the safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of the ChAdOx1 nCoV- 19 coronavirus vaccine (Recombinant) during the national vaccine roll out in January-March 2021, in a tertiary care hospital, New Delhi, India. Results: The vaccine was found to be safe, with local pain, fever and headache as the most common adverse events of milder nature which generally lasted for two days. The adverse events following vaccination were lower in the second dose as compared to the first dose. The vaccine was immunogenic, with seropositivity, which was 51 per cent before vaccination, increasing to 77 per cent after single dose and 98 per cent after two doses. Subgroup analysis indicated that those with the past history of COVID-19 attained seropositivity of 98 per cent even with single dose. The incidence of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR positive COVID-19 was significantly lower among vaccinated (11.7%) as compared to unvaccinated (22.2%). Seven cases of moderate COVID-19 needing hospitalization were seen in the unvaccinated and only one such in the vaccinated group. The difference was significant between the fully vaccinated (10.8%) and the partially vaccinated (12.7%). The hazard of COVID-19 infection was higher among male, age >50 yr and clinical role in the hospital. After adjustment for these factors, the hazard of COVID-19 infection among unvaccinated was 2.09 as compared to fully vaccinated. Vaccine effectiveness was 52.2 per cent in HCWs. Interpretation & conclusions: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus vaccine (Recombinant) was safe, immunogenic as well as showed effectiveness against the COVID-19 disease (CTRI/2021/01/030582).

PARTAKE survey of public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research in India.

BACKGROUND: A public that is an informed partner in clinical research is important for ethical, methodological, and operational reasons. There are indications that the public is unaware or misinformed, and not sufficiently engaged in clinical research but studies on the topic are lacking. PARTAKE - Public Awareness of Research for Therapeutic Advancements through Knowledge and Empowerment is a program aimed at increasing public awareness and partnership in clinical research. The PARTAKE Survey is a component of the program. OBJECTIVE: To study public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research. METHODS: A 40-item questionnaire combining multiple-choice and open-ended questions was administered to 175 English- or Hindi-speaking individuals in 8 public locations representing various socioeconomic strata in New Delhi, India. RESULTS: Interviewees were 18-84 old (mean: 39.6, SD ± 16.6), 23.6% female, 68.6% employed, 7.3% illiterate, 26.3% had heard of research, 2.9% had participated and 58.9% expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. The following perceptions were reported (% true/% false/% not aware): 'research benefits society' (94.1%/3.5%/2.3%), 'the government protects against unethical clinical research' (56.7%/26.3%/16.9%), 'research hospitals provide better care' (67.2%/8.7%/23.9%), 'confidentiality is adequately protected' (54.1%/12.3%/33.5%), 'participation in research is voluntary' (85.3%/5.8%/8.7%); 'participants treated like 'guinea pigs'' (20.7%/53.2%/26.0%), and 'compensation for participation is adequate' (24.7%/12.9%/62.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the Indian public is aware of some key features of clinical research (e.g., purpose, value, voluntary nature of participation), and supports clinical research in general but is unaware of other key features (e.g., compensation, confidentiality, protection of human participants) and exhibits some distrust in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials. Larger, cross-cultural surveys are required to inform educational programs addressing these issues.