A rapid improvement event: progesterone prescribing in prevention of miscarriage.

A rapid improvement event (RIE) is a standard operational excellence technique that uses team-based problem solving to improve processes. In this study, a RIE was undertaken to improve progesterone prescribing rates for those with a history of miscarriage experiencing vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. This was on the basis of a recent change in guidelines regarding prescribing in these instances. NICE guidelines changed in November 2021 after Cochrane meta-analysis and the PRISM (Progesterone in Spontaneous Miscarriage) randomised control trial demonstrated a higher incidence of live births in those prescribed vaginal micronised progesterone for threatened miscarriage, when compared with those not prescribed it.A RIE involves a team approach and a standard sequence of events allowing analysis and improvement of a process. Analysis in the form of audit revealed a low progesterone prescribing rate for eligible patients in our unit. Dissection of this problem into its elements revealed a low level of staff knowledge regarding the change in guidelines and a lack of confidence in prescription of progesterone. A plan of actionable events to improve prescribing rates was devised. The updated guidance and local recommendations on appropriate micronised progesterone formulations were presented at hospital Grand Rounds with multidisciplinary attendance. Infographics were displayed in areas visible to stakeholders within the hospital and on the hospital's social media pages. The validity of these educational measures to improve the process was reaudited after 3 months.Progesterone prescribing improved by 48%. Those comfortable with prescribing as per the new guidelines improved from 43% to 78%. A RIE proved to be an effective and efficient approach to collaboration, decision-making and action.

Pregnancy outcomes following recurrent miscarriage.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent miscarriage affects 1-2% of the population, and the literature has focussed on causes, treatment, and live birth rate. AIM: This study aimed to assess the reproductive outcomes for patients who attended a specialist recurrent miscarriage clinic for investigation and treatment. METHODS: Prospective analysis of all patients who attended a recurrent miscarriage clinic from January 2014 to January 2021. RESULTS: Of the 488 patients who attended a specialist clinic, 318 had a further pregnancy with 299 included in this study. The median age was 37 years, with 55.6% having a previous live birth. The subsequent live birth rate was 75.3%, 22.0% had a further pregnancy loss, 1.7% had an ongoing pregnancy, and 1% attended another institution after the second trimester. The rate of preeclampsia was 2.2%, pregnancy-induced hypertension was 2.2%, fetal growth restriction was 5.3%, preterm birth ≤ 34 weeks was 1.8%, and preterm birth > 34 weeks < 37 weeks was 6.6%. CONCLUSION: Patients who attend a dedicated recurrent miscarriage clinic for investigation and treatment have a high live birth rate in a subsequent pregnancy. A subsequent pregnancy following recurrent pregnancy loss does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Second-trimester miscarriage: a review of postnatal investigations and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Second-trimester loss is pregnancy loss after the 12th and before the 24th completed weeks of pregnancy. This study aims to review cases of second-trimester miscarriage who attended a large maternity hospital and to examine pregnancy outcomes in this group of women. METHODS: This study is a review of cases of second-trimester miscarriage using descriptive, exploratory design, involving a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: In this study, 106 cases of second-trimester miscarriage were reviewed. The cause of the miscarriage was found in 42.5% (n = 45) of cases. The majority of women, 84.5% (n = 82) had a normal pelvic ultrasound scan and 18.3% (n = 17) of cases were diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome. In women who became pregnant again, 60.9% (n = 39) had a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing the cause of second-trimester miscarriage can be challenging, despite completing all recommended investigations. Outcomes in subsequent pregnancies are reassuring. This review highlights the need to undertake all recommended investigations to elicit the cause of second-trimester miscarriage and underpins the need for further research in this area.

A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders.

BACKGROUND: Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic process in which allele-specific gene expression is dependent on the parental inheritance. Although only a minority of human genes are imprinted, those that have been identified to date have been preferentially implicated in prenatal growth and neurodevelopment. Mutations or epimutations in imprinted genes or imprinting control centres are associated with imprinting disorders such as Angelman syndrome (AS) and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). Recently, an increased frequency of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conceptions has been reported in children with BWS and AS. However, the risk of imprinting disorders in ART children is unknown. METHODS: We undertook a survey of 2492 children born after ART in the Republic of Ireland and Central England with the aim of detecting cases (both clinically diagnosed and previously unrecognized) of BWS and AS in this cohort. The response rate to an initial questionnaire was 61%, corresponding to data for 1524 children. After evaluation of the questionnaire, 70 children were invited for a detailed clinical assessment, and 47 accepted (response rate of 67%). RESULTS: In this entire cohort, we detected one case of BWS and no cases of AS. We did not find evidence that there exists a significant group of ART children with unrecognized milder forms of AS or BWS. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous studies have suggested an increased relative risk of BWS and AS after ART, our findings suggest that the absolute risk of imprinting disorders in children conceived by ART is small (<1%). Precise risk estimates of risk are difficult to define because of the rarity of the conditions and incomplete response rates to the questionnaire and clinical examination invitations. Hence further investigations are indicated to (i) refine the absolute and relative risks of imprinting disorders after ART and (ii) ensure that changes in ART protocols are not associated with increased frequencies of epigenetic changes and imprinting disorders in children born after ART.

Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting.

It is estimated that approximately 1% of the newborn population of the British Isles are conceived following assisted reproduction technologies such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). While the long term outcome of IVF children is mostly reassuring, some concerns remain. Specifically, recent studies have suggested a possible association between assisted conception and clinical conditions of genetic origin known as genomic imprinting defects. This has arisen from several different studies observing an excess of assisted conceptions among the rare clinical disorders of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS). The numbers of such patients described in the studies to date are small but indicate a clear need for large-scale investigations to clarify the link between genomic imprinting defects and assisted conception as well as to establish the exact biological basis of any such link. In view of the strong public interest in this area of medicine, it behoves all professionals working in reproductive medicine and associated areas to be aware of these emerging data and be in a position to discuss them in as informed and responsible a manner with patients, as current data limitations permit.