Differential effects of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular disease in females: A narrative review and call to action.

OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking continues to be a major driver in the incidence and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). As females become an increasingly larger fraction of those who smoke it is imperative that the sex-specific effects of smoking be further explored and acted upon. METHODS: This narrative review describes current evidence on the differential effects of smoking on CVD in females and the need to improve treatment. RESULTS: Evidence to date suggests that smoking has disproportionately negative effects on the cardiovascular (CV) system in females, especially in those who are younger. Usually, the onset of CVD is later in females than males, but smoking decreases or eliminates this gap. Females are also more likely to develop types of CVD closely tied to smoking, such as ST-elevated myocardial infarctions, with even higher rates among those who are younger. Possible mechanisms for these worse outcomes in females include a complex interplay between nicotine, other products of combusted cigarettes, and hormones. Sex differences also exist in treatment for smoking. In females, Varenicline appears more effective than either Bupropion or nicotine replacement therapy while in males, all three therapies show similar efficacy. Disparities in smoking are also apparent in secondary prevention settings. Females and males are entering secondary prevention with equal rates of smoking, with potentially higher levels of exposure to the byproducts of smoking in females. CONCLUSIONS: These disproportionately negative outcomes for females who smoke require additional research and these persisting rates of smoking suggest a need for female-specific approaches for treating smoking.

Updates on Non-Statin LDL-Lowering Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is ample evidence of the benefits and safety of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering therapies in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. While statins remain the first-line agent for LDL reduction, several new therapies are now available. This narrative review provides an overview of currently available non-statin LDL-lowering agents, specifically mechanisms of action and data on efficacy and safety. It also discusses recommendations on their use in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid have proven safe and efficacious in reducing cardiovascular events in large randomized controlled trials. Inclisiran is a promising agent that suppresses PCSK9 mRNA translation and is currently under investigation in a large clinical outcomes randomized controlled trial assessing its effect on clinical outcomes. Expert consensus advocates for lower LDL targets in higher risk patients and escalation to or a combination of non-statin therapies as needed to achieve these goals.

Differential Incidence of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Comparing Intravenous and Intraarterial Contrast Administration.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) remains a significant concern in diagnostic and invasive procedures, particularly in the context of iodinated contrast material administration. The traditional definition of CA-AKI, based on serum creatinine elevation following contrast exposure, may not accurately capture its multifactorial nature. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have provided new insights into the differential incidence of CA-AKI between intravenous and intraarterial contrast administration, emphasizing the importance of tailored preventative strategies for high-risk procedures. This higher risk may arise from two proposed mechanisms: one implicating free radical formation leading to cytotoxicity and apoptosis in renal cells and another suggesting that contrast media alter renal hemodynamics, particularly in the outer medulla, by constricting the vasa recta and reducing medullary flow. Advances in technology and patient care, including contemporary use of low-osmolar contrast agents and hydration protocols, mitigate CA-AKI risk. Diagnostic and invasive procedures should not be avoided solely due to concerns about renal dysfunction if the patient is likely to benefit clinically.