The association between men's family planning networks and contraceptive use among their female partners: an egocentric network study in Madagascar.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring women have information, support and access to family planning (FP) services will allow women to exercise their reproductive autonomy and reduce maternal mortality, which remains high in countries such as Madagascar. Research shows that women's social networks - their ties with partners, family members, friends, and providers - affect their contraceptive use. Few studies have considered the role of men's social networks on women's contraceptive use. Insofar as women's contraceptive use may be influenced by their male partners, women's contraceptive use may also be affected by their partner's social networks. Men may differ by the types of ties they rely on for information and advice about FP. It is unknown whether differences in the composition of men's FP networks matter for couples' contraceptive use. This study assessed the association between men's FP networks and couples' contraceptive use. METHODS: This egocentric network study was conducted among married/partnered men (n = 178) in rural Madagascar. Study participants listed who they relied on for FP information and advice, including health providers and social ties. They provided ties' gender, age, relationship, and perceived support of contraceptive use. The primary outcome was couples' contraceptive use, and explanatory variables included FP networks and their composition (no FP network, social-only network, provider-only network, and mixed network of social and provider ties). Analyses used generalized linear models specifying a Poisson distribution, with covariate adjustment and cluster robust standard errors. RESULTS: Men who had FP networks were 1.9 times more likely to use modern contraception as a couple compared to men with no FP network (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-2.52; p ≤ 0.001). Compared to men with no FP network, men were more likely to use modern contraception if they had a social-only network, relative risk (RR) = 2.10 (95% CI, 1.65-2.68; p ≤ 0.001); a provider-only network, RR = 1.80 (95% CI, 1.54-2.11; p ≤ 0.001); or a mixed network, RR = 2.35 (95% CI, 1.97-2.80; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Whether men have a FP network, be it provider or social ties, distinguishes if couples are using contraception. Interventions should focus on reaching men not only through providers but also through their social ties to foster communication and support for contraceptive use.

Social and provider networks and women's contraceptive use: Evidence from Madagascar.

OBJECTIVES: Women may differ by whether they rely on health providers and/or social ties for seeking information and advice about family planning. It is unknown whether these differences matter for contraceptive outcomes. This study assessed the association between women's family planning (FP) network (social and/or provider ties) and contraceptive use. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional, egocentric network study was conducted among reproductive-age women (n = 193) in rural Madagascar. Data included socio-demographics and contraceptive use. Respondents listed who they relied on for contraceptive information, advice or guidance and provided ties' gender, age, relationship, and perceived support of contraceptive use. The primary outcome was current contraceptive use. Predictors included having a FP network (0/1) and FP network composition (no network, social ties only, provider ties only, both provider and social ties), respectively. Analyses were conducted using a generalized linear model specifying a Poisson distribution, with covariate adjustment and cluster robust standard errors. RESULTS: Having a network of individuals to turn to for contraceptive information compared to having no FP network was positively associated with contraceptive use (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00-9.87). Having a social network, a provider network, or a combination of social and provider network were all positively associated with contraceptive use (aRR 4.30 [CI 1.92-9.66], aRR 4.46 [CI 2.04-9.75], aRR 4.72 [CI 1.93-11.50], respectively), compared to having no FP network. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive use was higher among women who relied on social ties, provider ties or both for contraceptive information and advice, compared to women with no FP network. These findings suggest that FP interventions should use a multicomponent approach taking into account both social and provider networks. IMPLICATIONS: It is unknown whether differences in whether women rely on social ties (friends, partner, family members) vs. providers for contraceptive information and advice affect contraceptive outcomes. Women are just as likely to use contraception whether they rely on social ties, provider ties, or both for contraceptive information and advice.