Relationship between age and blastocyst chromosomal ploidy analyzed by noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between human blastocyst chromosomal ploidy established by niPGT-A and increasing age. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter study carried out by ten assisted reproduction centers after their embryologists acquired training and validated their results with the previous use of niPGT-A. A total of 94 couples with indication for niPGT-A due to increase maternal age, male factor, repeated implantation failures, recurrent abortion or because they requested niPGT-A were included in this study. The couples had no karyotype abnormalities. After ICSI, the embryos were cultured until blastocyst stage using one or two step culture systems, single or sequential media respectively, at 37°C in an atmosphere of 6-7% CO2 and 5-20% O2 incubators. On day 3, we re-evaluated cleavage embryos to complete cumulus cells removal. The embryos were then cultured in individual well, with 20µl of medium under oil until they reached blastocyst stage. The blastocysts were vitrified and stored in liquid nitrogen. After that, the spent blastocyst culture medium (20µl) was transferred to a PCR tube and sent for analysis in the genetic laboratory, where it was stored at -80°C until sequencing. A total of 243 samples of spent blastocyst culture medium were collected on the 5th/6th day. Cell-free DNA secreted on culture medium was amplified using NICS Sample Preparation Kit (Yikon Genomics), based on the MALBAC technology. After whole genome amplification, the DNA was measured using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer and subjected to next generation sequencing (NGS) using Illumina MiSeq® platform. The data were analyzed using the ChromGo® software (Yikon Genomics). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 38±4.08 years with an interval of 20-44 years. The euploid was diagnosed in 36.4% (80/220) of cases, aneuploidy in 31.3% (69/220), and mosaicism in 32.3% (71/220; with ≥60% aneuploidy) of blastocysts. Mosaic values ranged from 29.8% to 33.8% in different age groups. Individually, the most frequent chromosomal abnormality was XXY (Klinefelter Syndrome) occurring in 18 cases, followed by chromosome 21 (trisomy/monosomy) in 8 cases. The niPGT-A data showed a ≥60% incidence of aneuploid cells in all cases of chromosomal mosaicism (n=71). CONCLUSION: A high degree of mosaicism with aneuploidy cells was detected, and some hypotheses were suggested for this data (niPGT-A sensitivity in detecting the self-correction of chromosomal abnormalities phenomenon). However, it did not vary remarkably with age. On the other hand, euploidy levels had a negative correlation with age and aneuploidy levels had a positive relationship. This is the first report in the literature to relate chromosomal ploidy in blastocysts using niPGT-A and increasing patient age.

Oral dydrogesterone vs. vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support in women undergoing embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify, appraise, and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral dydrogesterone to vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support (LPS) in women offered fresh or frozen embryo transfers following in vitro fertilization. METHODS: Two independent authors screened the literature for papers based on titles and abstracts, then selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Dydrogesterone and progesterone were compared based on risk ratios (RR) and the precision of the estimates was assessed through the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: An electronic search performed on June 7, 2017 retrieved 376 records, nine of which were papers deemed eligible and included in this systematic review and quantitative analysis. Good quality evidence indicates that oral dydrogesterone provided at least similar results than vaginal progesterone capsules on live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.08, 95%CI=0.92-1.26, I2=29%, 8 RCTs, 3,386 women) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.27; I2=43%; 9 RCTs; 4,061 women). Additionally, moderate quality evidence suggests there is no relevant difference on miscarriage rates (RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.68-1.26, I2=6%, 8 RCTs, 988 clinical pregnancies; the quality of the evidence was downgraded because of imprecision). CONCLUSIONS: Good quality evidence from RCTs suggest that oral dydrogesterone provides at least similar reproductive outcomes than vaginal progesterone capsules when used for LPS in women undergoing embryo transfers. Dydrogesterone is a reasonable option and the choice of either of the medications should be based on cost and side effects.