RESUMO
Background: The optimal treatment regimen for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) remains unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of (VKAs) versus direct apixaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CA-VTE. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy and safety of apixaban and LMWH in patients with CA-VTE. Major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and bleeding-related mortality were among outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results: The analysis included 12 011 patients from 3 RCTs and 2 observational studies. Compared to LMWH, apixaban significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.54, 0.83); P=0.0003, I2=0%] without significantly changing the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding [RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.64, 0.1.45); P=0.85, I2=57%]. Patients on apixaban had a noticeably reduced the risk of recurrence of PE than those taking LMWH, according to a meta-analysis [RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.32, 0.99); P=0.05, I2=0%]. There was no discernible difference between apixaban and LMWH in bleeding-related mortality events [RR 0.20 (95% CI 0.01, 4.18); P=0.30, I2=NA%], and recurrence of DVT [RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.22, 1.59); P=0.23, I2=32%]. Conclusion: Due to its lower risk of severe bleeding and reduced PE recurrence, apixaban may be a preferable treatment option for CA-VTE, but additional research is required to validate these conclusions and evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety.
RESUMO
Background: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have shown a significant occurrence of thromboembolism and a heightened risk of death. It remains unclear whether factor Xa inhibitors are superior to enoxaparin in this context. Hence, there is a need for a direct comparison to assess the preventive effects and safety of factor Xa inhibitors versus enoxaparin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective studies that compared the effectiveness or safety of factor Xa inhibitors and enoxaparin in preventing thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Embolic incidence, incidence of bleeding, and all-cause mortality were among the outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95 percent CIs. Results: The analysis included six RCTs and two retrospective studies containing 4048 patients. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction among patients on factor Xa inhibitors compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the embolic incidence [risk ratio (RR) 0.64 (95%, CI 0.42, 0.98); P=0.04, I2=12%]. Upon subgroup analysis by type of study design, no significant reductions were noted in patients on factor Xa inhibitors in RCTs (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.33-1.17; P=0.14) or observational studies (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.23-1.26; P=0.15) when compared with enoxaparin Factor Xa inhibitors were not significantly associated with incidence of bleeding [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.36, 1.61); P=0.47, I2=0%] or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.48-1.36; P=0.43). Consistent results were obtained upon subgroup analysis by the type of study design. Conclusion: Factor Xa inhibitors are more effective than enoxaparin in preventing thromboembolism among patients with COVID-19 who are not acutely ill and are hospitalized. Additional rigorous RCTs comparing factor Xa inhibitors with enoxaparin are warranted.
RESUMO
Background: The clinical effectiveness of hypertonic saline (HS) in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) can be compromised by adverse effects. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) in mitigating these negative occurrences. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out using three electronic databases: Medline, Cochrane Central, and Embase. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the efficacy of hypertonic saline (HS) with and without hyaluronic acid (HA) in treating cystic fibrosis. Primary outcomes include the incidence of cough, throat irritation, unpleasant taste, and changes in FEV1. Our findings suggest that adding HA to HS significantly reduces adverse effects and enhances patient tolerability, marking a potential improvement in cystic fibrosis therapy. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were used to present evaluations. The quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (CRBT). The quality of the observational study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: From the 1960 articles retrieved from the initial search, five relevant studies (n=236 patients) were included in the final analysis. Compared with patients only on HS, patients with HS and HA were significantly less likely to experience cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and unpleasant smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09). In addition, patients with HS with HA had significantly less forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79--2.15, P=0.52), compared to patients only on HS. Patients on HA + HS had significantly lower rates of cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and bad smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09) when compared to patients on HS alone. Furthermore, compared to patients solely on HS, patients with HS plus HA exhibited a substantially lower forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79 to -2.15, P=0.52) as well. Conclusion: For CF patients who need ongoing HS therapy and have a history of poor therapy tolerance, adding HA is beneficial.
RESUMO
Background This study aimed to investigate the incidence and subtype of thyroid cancer in multinodular goitre (MNG) patients who underwent total thyroidectomy. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Khyber Teaching Hospital, screening 207 MNG patients who received complete thyroidectomies between July and December 2022. The senior consultant diagnosed thyroid cancer based on a complete history, physical examination, and laboratory and radiological studies. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology was performed by a senior consultant radiologist. Bethesda categories for all lesions were recorded. All patients underwent thyroidectomy, and the diagnosis of thyroid cancer was confirmed on histopathology. Results A total of 207 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 45.55 ± 8.75 years. Out of 207 patients, 24 (11.59%) were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Out of 62 male patients, 15 (7.25%) had thyroid cancer. Out of 145 female patients, only nine had cancer (p < 0.001). Nine patients with thyroid cancer had a body mass index (BMI) below 18, compared to only five patients with a BMI of more than 30 kg/m2. The difference in age distribution was not significant in our study (p = 0.102). Conclusion In conclusion, our study sheds light on the frequency and potential risk factors associated with thyroid cancer in patients with multinodular goiter. Our findings reveal that papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most commonly observed form of thyroid cancer in this patient population, with around 12 percent of patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Notably, our study highlights that male patients and those with a lower BMI may have a greater risk of developing thyroid cancer in the context of multinodular goiter. The findings of this study have important implications for the care and follow-up of MNG patients who receive total thyroidectomy. Further research is needed to investigate the type and prognosis of thyroid cancer in patients with MNG.