Interdisciplinary implementation of tacrolimus intravenous standard concentration in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.

Purpose Reduction in waste of intravenous (IV) tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant used to prevent graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients, was evaluated after standardizing the concentration. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study at a large academic comprehensive cancer center was performed comparing patient-specific intravenous tacrolimus doses (tacrolimus doses in 50, 100, or 250 mL of normal saline based on manufacturer's recommended concentration) to tacrolimus intravenous standard concentration (tacrolimus 1 mg in 250 mL of normal saline) continuous intravenous infusion titrated to prescribed dose. The cohort study was performed on two hematopoietic stem cell transplantation nursing units consisting of a prepilot phase during which time patient-specific intravenous tacrolimus doses were compounded and administered, followed by the pilot phase during which patients received tacrolimus intravenous standard concentration. The primary endpoint was reduction in tacrolimus intravenous bags wasted. Secondary endpoints were drug cost savings, decreased intravenous infusion line supplies, decrease in time needed to execute dose changes, reduction in infusion pump alerts, and number of patient safety events. Results Compared to the prepilot phase, there was a 64% reduction in tacrolimus intravenous bags wasted during the pilot phase ( p = 0.029), resulting in a mean monthly total cost savings of $224.31 for pilot units. Intravenous pump line use was reduced by 18% ( p = 0.067), yielding a monthly total cost savings of $84.02 for pilot units. The median time needed to execute dose changes and intravenous pump overrides was significantly reduced ( p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion This interdisciplinary quality improvement initiative led to increased efficiency, reduction in waste, and decreased intravenous pump alerts utilizing tacrolimus intravenous standard concentration.

Comparison of resting energy expenditure prediction methods with measured resting energy expenditure in obese, hospitalized adults.

BACKGROUND: Several methods are available to estimate caloric needs in hospitalized, obese patients who require specialized nutrition support; however, it is unclear which of these strategies most accurately approximates the caloric needs of this patient population. The purpose of this study was to determine which strategy most accurately predicts resting energy expenditure in this subset of patients. METHODS: Patients assessed at high nutrition risk who required specialized nutrition support and met inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this observational study. Adult patients were included if they were admitted to a medical or surgical service with a body mass index > or = 30 kg/m(2). Criteria excluding patient enrollment were pregnancy and intolerance or contraindication to indirect calorimetry procedures. Investigators calculated estimations of resting energy expenditure for each patient using variations on the following equations: Harris-Benedict, Mifflin-St. Jeor, Ireton-Jones, 21 kcal/kg body weight, and 25 kcal/kg body weight. For nonventilated patients, the MedGem handheld indirect calorimeter was used. For ventilated patients, the metabolic cart was used. The primary endpoint was to identify which estimation strategy calculated energy expenditures to within 10% of measured energy expenditures. RESULTS: The Harris-Benedict equation, using adjusted body weight with a stress factor, most frequently estimated resting energy expenditure to within 10% measured resting energy expenditure at 50% of patients. CONCLUSION: Measured energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry should be employed when developing nutrition support regimens in obese, hospitalized patients, as estimation strategies are inconsistent and lead to inaccurate predictions of energy expenditure in this patient population.

US practitioner opinions and prescribing practices regarding corticosteroid therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine opinions and practices of US critical care practitioners (USCCPs) toward corticosteroid therapy in adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, electronic survey of USCCP members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine was conducted between March 18 and July 31, 2009. RESULTS: A total of 542 USCCPs responded to the survey. The majority (83%) do not commonly use corticosteroids in adult patients with severe sepsis; however, up to 81% report use of corticosteroids for septic shock. Twenty-eight percent believe that corticosteroids reduce mortality in septic shock, whereas 27% do not and 45% are unsure. The decision to initiate therapy is based, more often, on a patient's clinical status (65%) vs serum cortisol analysis (35%). Hydrocortisone is the most common corticosteroid prescribed (93%), with a median dosage of 200 mg/d and administration via intermittent intravenous injection. The Corticosteroid Therapy of Septic Shock trial had a large impact on survey respondents, with 62% reporting a practice change. Among the 19% of practitioners who do not prescribe corticosteroids, the most common reason was lack of proven survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids are commonly used by USCCPs in adult patients with septic shock; however, criteria used to initiate therapy and opinions regarding their impact vary.

Use of bivalirudin to prevent thrombosis following orthotopic liver transplantation in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated syndrome that may arise in a time-dependent manner following heparin therapy, placing patients at significant risk for thromboembolic events. Therapy includes anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor and avoidance of heparin. We report a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented for orthotopic liver transplant and required postoperative anticoagulation with bivalirudin. During the post-transplant graft function improvement, we observed a significant dose-effect alteration manifested by an increased bivalirudin dose requirement as factor V activity increased. This observation is an important consideration in the attempt to maintain an optimal balance between effective anticoagulation and a reduced risk of postoperative bleeding.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a renal transplant recipient.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is an immunologically mediated reduction in platelets that increases the risk of arterial or venous thrombosis. It has been reported in up to 5% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin. Unlike other thrombocytopenic coagulopathies, HIT is associated with a high risk of thromboembolic events if not treated with an appropriate anticoagulant alternative. Diagnosis is dependent on assessment of platelet reduction, identification of previous heparin exposure, detection of thrombotic complications and evaluation of laboratory assays. HIT has been well described in surgical patient populations; however, the abdominal organ transplant population is an exception. HIT should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with thrombocytopenia after transplantation in order to prevent or treat thrombotic complications that can pose a risk to patient or graft survival.