Prospective Pilot Study Comparing Pre- and Postsurgical CTSAQ and Neuro-QoL Questionnaire with Median Nerve High-Resolution Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Areas.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (1) to assess the utility of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorder (Neuro-QoL) questionnaire in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome by comparing the validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure Neuro-QoL to the validated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment Questionnaire (CTSAQ) before and following carpal tunnel release, (2) to compare the measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) using high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) before and after surgery, and (3) to determine a correlation between HRUS and PRO. METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome were evaluated using the CTSAQ, Neuro-QoL, and HRUS before surgery and at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty patients completed the study. Overwhelmingly, there was an improvement in symptoms and function assessed by patients on both the Neuro-QoL and the CTSAQ at 3 months after surgery. The Neuro-QoL Physical Function and Upper Extremity scores had strong correlation with the CTSAQ activity score but had low to moderate correlation with the CTSAQ symptoms score, before and after surgery. The HRUS measurements of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet demonstrated a decrease in CSA whereas no noticeable changes were observed at mid tunnel and at the outlet (hook of hamate). The correlations between the ultrasound findings and PRO measures ranged from weak to strong. CONCLUSIONS: Patients had resolution of symptoms and higher physical function following carpal tunnel release measured by both the CTSAQ and the Neuro-QoL scores. The Neuro-QoL self-assessment questionnaire, a measurement of quality of life, correlated well with the CTSAQ. Therefore, it could be used as a self-assessment outcomes tool in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. At 3 months after surgery, HRUS measurements of the median nerve CSA showed a noticeable decrease of CSA only at the inlet of carpal tunnel. This objective improvement correlated with the improvement in CTSAQ and Neuro-QoL scores. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis II.

Reachable workspace and performance of upper limb (PUL) in duchenne muscular dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION: The Kinect-based reachable workspace relative surface area (RSA) is compared with the performance of upper limb (PUL) assessment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHODS: 29 individuals with DMD (ages: 7-23; Brooke: 1-5) underwent both Kinect-based reachable workspace RSA and PUL assessments. RSAs were also collected from 24 age-matched controls. Total and quadrant RSAs were compared with the PUL total, shoulder-, middle-, and distal-dimension scores. RESULTS: The total reachable workspace RSA correlated well with the total PUL score (Spearman ρ = -0.602; P < 0.001), and with each of the PUL dimensional scores: shoulder (ρ = -0.624; P < 0.001), middle (ρ = -0.564; P = 0.001), and distal (ρ = -0.630; P < 0.001). With quadrant RSA, reachability in a particular quadrant was closely associated with respective PUL dimensional-level function (lateral-upper quadrant for shoulder-, lateral-upper/lower quadrants for middle-, and lateral-lower quadrant for distal-level function). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates concurrent validity of the reachable workspace outcome measure (RSA) with the DMD-specific upper extremity outcome measure (PUL).

Reliability Assessment of Various Sonographic Techniques for Evaluating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Objectives-The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of sonographic measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy control participants.Methods-The median nerve cross-sectional area was evaluated by sonography in 18 participants with carpal tunnel syndrome (18 upper extremities) and 9 control participants (18 upper extremities) at 2 visits 1 week apart. Two examiners, both blinded to the presence or absence of carpal tunnel syndrome, captured independent sonograms of the median nerve at the levels of the carpal tunnel inlet, pronator quadratus, and mid-forearm. The cross-sectional area was later measured by each examiner independently. Each also traced images that were captured by the other examiner.Results-Both the intra- and inter-rater reliability rates were highest for images taken at the carpal tunnel inlet (radiologist, r = 0.86; sonographer, r = 0.87; inter-rater, r = 0.95; all P < .0001), whereas they was lowest for the pronator quadratus (r = 0.49, 0.29, and 0.72, respectively; all P < .0001). At the mid-forearm, the intra-rater reliability was lower for both the radiologist and sonographer, whereas the inter-rater reliability was relatively high (r = 0.54, 0.55, and 0.81; all P < .0001). Tracing of captured images by different examiners showed high concordance for the median cross-sectional area at the carpal tunnel inlet (r = 0.96-0.98; P < .0001).Conclusions-The highest intra- and inter-rater reliability was found at the carpal tunnel inlet. The results also demonstrate that tracing of the median nerve cross-sectional area from captured images by different examiners does not contribute significantly to measurement variability.