Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Br J Haematol ; 189(5): 860-868, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32068255

RESUMO

Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. The originally approved dosing schedule of bortezomib results in significant toxicities that require dose interruptions and discontinuations. Consequentially, less frequent dosing has been explored to optimise bortezomib's benefit-risk profile. Here, we performed exposure-response analysis to compare the efficacy of the original bortezomib dosing regimen with less frequent dosing of bortezomib over nine 6-week treatment cycles using data from the VISTA clinical trial and the control arm of the ALCYONE clinical trial. The relationship between cumulative bortezomib dose and clinical response was evaluated with a univariate logit model. The median cumulative bortezomib dose was higher in ALCYONE versus VISTA (42·2 vs. 38·5 mg/m2 ) and ALCYONE patients stayed on treatment longer (mean: 7·2 vs. 5·8 cycles). For all endpoints and regimens, probability of clinical response correlated with cumulative bortezomib dose. Similar to results observed for VISTA, overall survival was longer in ALCYONE patients with ≥ 39·0 versus < 39·0 mg/m2 cumulative dose (hazard ratio, 0·119; P < 0·0001). Less frequent bortezomib dosing results in comparable efficacy, and a higher cumulative dose than the originally approved bortezomib dosing schedule, which may be in part be due to reduced toxicity and fewer dose reductions/interruptions.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteassoma/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Inibidores de Proteassoma/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteassoma/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Br J Haematol ; 184(2): 232-241, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203839

RESUMO

Siltuximab is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD), a rare haematological disorder associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although siltuximab induces a response in a significant proportion of iMCD patients via interleukin 6 (IL6) neutralization, it is not universally effective. To develop a predictive model of response, we performed an in-depth analysis of 38 baseline laboratory parameters in iMCD patients from the phase II siltuximab trial who met criteria for treatment response or treatment failure. Univariate analyses identified eight baseline laboratory parameters that were significantly different between responders and treatment failures: albumin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A, C reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, haemoglobin, sodium and triglycerides. Stepwise logistic regression analysis of these candidate parameters identified a top performing model that included fibrinogen, IgG, haemoglobin and CRP. Based on cross-validation of the final multivariate logistic regression model, the model accurately discriminated responders from those who failed treatment (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0·86, 95% confidence interval: 0·73-0·95). All four laboratory parameters associated with response to siltuximab have biological relationships with IL6 and acute inflammation. Our model suggests that iMCD patients with laboratory evidence of an inflammatory syndrome are the best candidates for siltuximab therapy.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/tratamento farmacológico , Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inibidores , Modelos Biológicos , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/sangue , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/patologia , Feminino , Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Interleucina-6/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
3.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 69(4): 425-430, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31181017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted based on a request from the European Medicines Agency to generate robust data on domperidone efficacy in children in the relief of symptoms of nausea and vomiting by assessing the effect of a low-dose and short treatment duration. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, children ages 6 months to 12 years with acute gastroenteritis randomly (1:1) received oral domperidone 0.25 mg/kg with oral rehydration therapy (ORT) or matching placebo thrice daily for 2 to 7 days. The proportion of patients with no vomiting episodes (primary endpoint) and patients ages ≥4 years with no nausea episodes (key secondary endpoint) within 48 hours of first treatment administration were evaluated. RESULTS: The study was terminated early following futility analysis. At early termination, 292 patients randomly received domperidone (n = 147) or placebo (n = 145). The proportion of patients with no vomiting episodes within 48-hours of first treatment administration was similar between domperidone (32.0%) and placebo groups (33.8%). Similarly, there was no significant difference in proportion of patients ages ≥4 years with no nausea episodes within 48 hours of first treatment administration between domperidone (35.7%) and placebo (38.6%). Total 13 patients (domperidone, 3.4% [5/147] vs placebo, 5.5% [8/145]) reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events. No deaths or adverse events of special interest (extrapyramidal symptoms and QT prolongation) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose of domperidone with ORT did not significantly differ from placebo in reducing vomiting and nausea episodes in pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis (AG), and the safety profile was similar between both groups.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Domperidona/uso terapêutico , Gastroenterite/complicações , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Antieméticos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Domperidona/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Náusea/complicações , Federação Russa , África do Sul , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/complicações
4.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(11): 1449-1458, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30348538

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the LYM-3002 study, the efficacy and safety of frontline bortezomib plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) were compared in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated, newly diagnosed, mantle cell lymphoma. We report the final overall survival and safety outcomes for patients in the long-term follow-up phase after the primary progression-free-survival endpoint was met. METHODS: LYM-3002 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 128 clinical centres in 28 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Adult patients with confirmed stage II-IV previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, who were ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six or eight 21-day cycles of VR-CAP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2) or R-CHOP (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [2 mg maximum], rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the sponsor; permuted blocks central randomisation was used (block size of 4), and was stratified by International Prognostic Index score and disease stage at diagnosis. The primary endpoint of this final analysis was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00722137, and is closed to new participants with follow-up completed. FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2008, and Dec 5, 2011, 487 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. 268 patients (140 in the VR-CAP group and 128 in the R-CHOP group) were included in the follow-up analysis, which included patients with data available after the primary analysis clinical cutoff date of Dec 2, 2013. After median follow-up of 82·0 months (IQR 74·1-94·2), median overall survival was significantly longer in the VR-CAP group than in the R-CHOP group (90·7 months [95% CI 71·4 to not estimable] vs 55·7 months [47·2 to 68·9]; hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·85]; p=0·001). Three new adverse events were reported since the primary analysis cutoff (one each of grade 4 lung adenocarcinoma and grade 4 gastric cancer in the VR-CAP group, and one case of grade 2 pneumonia in the R-CHOP group). 103 (42%) of 243 patients in the VR-CAP group, and 138 (57%) of 244 in the R-CHOP group died; the most common cause of death was progressive disease. INTERPRETATIONS: Compared with R-CHOP, VR-CAP was associated with significantly longer survival, and had a manageable and expected safety profile. Our results support further assessment of VR-CAP in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/tratamento farmacológico , Rituximab/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Ásia , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/mortalidade , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , América do Norte , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/efeitos adversos
5.
Adv Ther ; 38(1): 640-659, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33211297

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe the treatment patterns among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who had not received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). It further compares the safety and clinical outcomes across different frontline regimens as well as explores whether treatment duration predicts outcomes. METHODS: Patients with MM (> 45 years) who had not received ASCT were retrospectively identified from the US SEER-Medicare (Jan 2007-Dec 2016) and Optum (Jan 2007-Sep 2018) databases. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare overall survival (OS) among bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone regimen (VRd), lenalidomide + dexamethasone regimen (Rd), cyclophosphamide + bortezomib + dexamethasone regimen (CyBorD), bortezomib + dexamethasone regimen (Vd), and other bortezomib-containing therapies based on propensity score matching. To address immortal time bias, time-fixed and time-dependent Cox models were employed to estimate the association of longer frontline treatment exposure with outcomes. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation; SD) age was 71 (9.8) years; and 49.51% were women. Bortezomib and lenalidomide-based combinations were the most common treatment modalities. After matching, the HR (95% CI) of OS by frontline therapies comparing VRd with Vd was 0.76 (0.66, 0.86), CyBorD was 0.87 (0.75, 1.05), for other bortezomib-based therapies was 0.56 (0.49, 0.64), Rd was 0.83 (0.73, 0.95), and for other therapies was 0.70 (0.61, 0.80). Longer frontline treatment duration was associated with better OS for overall frontline [HR (95% CI) 0.86 (0.82, 0.90)]; Vd [0.81 (0.74, 0.89)]; CyBorD [0.79 (0.64, 0.98)] and Rd [0.86 (0.78, 0.95)]. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated that the frontline therapies prescribed to most patients who did not receive ASCT for MM in the United States were consistent with the NCCN guideline recommendations. Longer frontline treatment duration was associated with improved OS.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
6.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 59(5): 668-676, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30536675

RESUMO

Dacogen, the formulated product of the pharmaceutically active agent decitabine (5 aza-2'-deoxycytidine), is approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The current analysis was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of decitabine in pediatric patients with AML and evaluate their consistency with the PK in adult patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by pooling decitabine concentration-time data from 5 adult (AML and MDS) and 2 pediatric (AML) studies. A total of 840 concentration-time data points obtained from 71 adults and 28 pediatric subjects (1 to 16 years old) were available for analysis. A 2-compartment linear pharmacokinetic (PK) model with allometric scaling using body surface area accounting for body size adequately described the PK of decitabine. After accounting for body size, decitabine pharmacokinetics were not affected by age, sex, race, dosing regimen, renal function (creatinine clearance), bilirubin, or disease type (AML or MDS) and all PK parameters (including clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, maximum concentration, time to reach maximal concentration, and terminal half-life) were comparable between adult and pediatric patients. Simulated concentration-time profiles using the final population PK model suggested that decitabine exposure at steady state was similar in adults and pediatrics for a 20 mg/m2 decitabine dose administered as a 1-hour infusion once daily. The current analysis suggests that decitabine PK is similar in pediatric AML patients and a combined adult AML and MDS population.


Assuntos
Decitabina/farmacocinética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Simulação por Computador , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA