Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tumori ; 97(3): 290-5, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21789005

RESUMO

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To compare the antioxidant status of cervical cancer patients with healthy controls and to assess the antioxidant levels before and after radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Antioxidant levels (glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde) were measured in 35 patients with cervical cancer and 35 age-matched healthy controls. Blood samples were collected twice (before and after treatment) from cervical cancer patients and once from healthy control subjects. RESULTS: In the patient group, pre-radiotherapy glutathione and glutathione peroxidase levels were significantly lower (P <0.01 and P <0.0001, respectively) than the control group. Pre-radiotherapy levels of superoxide dismutase were significantly higher in cancer patients (P <0.01). In general, no difference was observed between pre- and post-radiotherapy antioxidant levels in cancer patients. However, when post-radiotherapy glutathione levels were analyzed, patients who did not respond to treatment had significantly higher levels than those who did respond (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of antioxidants significantly differed between the patients with cervical cancer and the controls, and no change in antioxidant levels was observed after treatment. Moreover, further studies evaluating the predictive value of glutathione levels on treatment response are warranted.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Glutationa Peroxidase/sangue , Glutationa/sangue , Malondialdeído/sangue , Superóxido Dismutase/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/sangue , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/sangue , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Comorbidade , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiossensibilizantes/administração & dosagem , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/enzimologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia
2.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 15(6): 1377-1382, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898676

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to understand the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and prognostic factors for patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 31 patients receiving adjuvant RT between the dates of September 2003-January 2013 in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Surgery was performed in 27 (87%) patients as staging laparotomy, for 4 patients as total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was 4500-5040 cGy in 25-28 fractions. In addition, 23 patients received brachytherapy following EBRT, 12 patients received adjuvant, and 1 patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS: The median age was 63 (between 30 and 78). The stage distribution of the patients was as follows: Stage I, 20 (64%); Stage II, 7 (23%), and Stage III, 4 (13%) patients. Five-year locoregional control (LRC) rate was 100%, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 65.5% and 66.2%, respectively. Stage I or II patients have a tendency for better 5-year OS and DFS rates than Stage III patients (73.1% vs. 42.9% and 72.7% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.065 and 0.051). Regarding lymph node dissection was performed or not, 5-year OS (64.7% vs. 75.0%) was not statistically different between groups (P = 0.77). Five-year OS and DFS rates were 69.2% and 61.5% for patients receiving CT (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) versus 63.7% and 68.8% for patients not receiving CT; P = 0.63 and P = 0.89, respectively. Based on the analysis of peritoneal washings, 5-year OS was 0% for patients with malignant or suspicious cytology whereas 89% for patients with benign cytology (P = 0.000). A negative correlation was observed between mitotic count of sarcomatous component and DFS time (rs = -0.812 and P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and adjuvant RT seem beneficial for excellent LRC rate. However, survival rates are low due to distant metastases. Thus, there is a great need for better systemic therapies.


Assuntos
Carcinossarcoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinossarcoma/diagnóstico , Carcinossarcoma/mortalidade , Terapia Combinada , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/mortalidade
3.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 2019 Oct; 15(5): 1377-1382
Artigo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-213540

RESUMO

Objectives: The objective of the study is to understand the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and prognostic factors for patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. Materials and Methods: The records of 31 patients receiving adjuvant RT between the dates of September 2003–January 2013 in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Surgery was performed in 27 (87%) patients as staging laparotomy, for 4 patients as total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was 4500–5040 cGy in 25–28 fractions. In addition, 23 patients received brachytherapy following EBRT, 12 patients received adjuvant, and 1 patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Results: The median age was 63 (between 30 and 78). The stage distribution of the patients was as follows: Stage I, 20 (64%); Stage II, 7 (23%), and Stage III, 4 (13%) patients. Five-year locoregional control (LRC) rate was 100%, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 65.5% and 66.2%, respectively. Stage I or II patients have a tendency for better 5-year OS and DFS rates than Stage III patients (73.1% vs. 42.9% and 72.7% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.065 and 0.051). Regarding lymph node dissection was performed or not, 5-year OS (64.7% vs. 75.0%) was not statistically different between groups (P = 0.77). Five-year OS and DFS rates were 69.2% and 61.5% for patients receiving CT (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) versus 63.7% and 68.8% for patients not receiving CT; P = 0.63 and P = 0.89, respectively. Based on the analysis of peritoneal washings, 5-year OS was 0% for patients with malignant or suspicious cytology whereas 89% for patients with benign cytology (P = 0.000). A negative correlation was observed between mitotic count of sarcomatous component and DFS time (rs = −0.812 and P = 0.05). Conclusions: Surgery and adjuvant RT seem beneficial for excellent LRC rate. However, survival rates are low due to distant metastases. Thus, there is a great need for better systemic therapies

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA