One-year endometrial safety evaluation of a continuous combined transdermal matrix patch delivering low-dose estradiol-norethisterone acetate in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and endometrial protection of low-dose transdermal estradiol (E2)/norethisterone acetate (NETA) patches (Estalis 25/125) in terms of post-treatment incidence of endometrial hyperplasia/cancer after 1 year of treatment in postmenopausal women with intact uteri. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either transdermal E2/NETA (delivering daily doses of E2 25 microg and NETA 125 microg; applied every 3-4 days) or oral E2/NETA (E2 1mg and NETA 0.5 mg; given daily) in this open-label study. The primary variable was the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia/cancer based on endometrial biopsies; secondary variables included vaginal bleeding/spotting patterns, patch adhesion, safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomized (507 in the transdermal group and 169 in the oral group; one did not receive study drug) and >80% completed the study. There were no cases of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in either group and the upper limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval in the transdermal group was 0.85%. Over time, both treatments were associated with a decreasing frequency of spotting/bleeding days. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in both groups, and the majority was mild-to-moderate in intensity. Breast tenderness was the most frequently reported AE (transdermal 19.9% versus oral 28.4%). AEs related to the gastrointestinal system were more frequent with oral E2/NETA, and episodes of spotting and bleeding were more frequent with transdermal E2/NETA. Local skin tolerability of the transdermal matrix system was good. CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal E2/NETA (25 and 125 microg) provided adequate endometrial protection in postmenopausal women when evaluated according to CPMP/CHMP criteria, achieved a high rate of amenorrhea, and was well tolerated.

Differential effects of the antimuscarinic agents darifenacin and oxybutynin ER on memory in older subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of darifenacin controlled-release (CR) and oxybutynin extended-release (ER) on cognitive function (particularly memory) in older subjects. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=150) >/=60 years were randomised to darifenacin, oxybutynin ER or placebo in a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 3-week study. Doses were administered according to US labels: oxybutynin ER 10mg once daily (od), increasing to 15mg od then 20mg od by week 3; darifenacin 7.5mg od in weeks 1 and 2, then 15mg od in week 3. The primary end point was accuracy on the Name-Face Association Test (delayed recall) at week 3. RESULTS: Results of the Name-Face Association Test at week 3 showed no significant difference between darifenacin and placebo on delayed recall (mean difference, -0.06, p=0.908). In contrast, oxybutynin ER resulted in memory impairment, with significantly lower scores than placebo and darifenacin (mean differences, -1.30, p=0.011 and -1.24, p=0.022, respectively) for delayed recall on the Name-Face Association Test at week 3. Additional tests of delayed recall indicated significant memory impairment with oxybutynin ER versus placebo at certain time points, whereas darifenacin was similar to placebo. No between-treatment differences were detected in self-rated memory, demonstrating that subjects were unaware of memory deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: While darifenacin had no significant effects on memory versus placebo, oxybutynin ER caused significant memory deterioration (magnitude of effect comparable to brain aging of 10 years). The results also demonstrate that subjects may not recognise/report memory deterioration.