RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate that change of IPI values after sedation of patients undergoing cataract surgery under sedation. METHODS: We included 50 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing cataract surgery under sedation by phacoemulsification method in this prospective observational study. IPI, SpO2, ETCO2, respiratory rate (RR), peripheral pulse rate (PR), hemodynamic data and BIS values and perioperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Compared to baseline values, RR value at 5th min, RR, PR, IPI values at 10th min and RR, PR values at 15th min were significantly low and heart rate value at 15th min and arterial pressure, bispectral index (BIS) values at 5th min, 10th min, 15th min, 20th min, 25th min and 30th min were lower than baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: IPI monitoring will provide guidance during sedation of patients with comorbid diseases undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method.
Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/métodos , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Hipóxia/diagnóstico , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Taxa Respiratória/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/metabolismo , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipoventilação/diagnóstico , Hipoventilação/fisiopatologia , Hipóxia/etiologia , Hipóxia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oximetria , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The risk of emergence agitation (EA) is high in patients undergoing nasal surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of EA in adults undergoing septoplasty and the effect of ketamine on EA. METHODS: In this randomized study, a total of 102 ASA I-II patients who underwent septoplasty between July 2018 and April 2019 were divided into two groups: ketamine (Group-K, n=52) and saline (Group-S, n=50). After anesthesia induction, Group-K was intravenously administered 20mL of saline containing 1mgkg-1 ketamine, whereas Group-S was administered 20mL of saline. Sedation and agitation scores at emergence from anesthesia, incidence of cough, emergence time, and response to verbal stimuli time were recorded. The sedation/agitation and pain levels were recorded for 30minutes in the recovery unit. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the incidence of EA (Group-K: 15.4%, Group-S: 24%). The incidence of cough during emergence was higher in Group-S than in Group-K, but the response time to verbal stimuli and emergence time were shorter in Group-S. The sedation and agitation scores were similar after surgery. Pain scores were higher in Group-S at the time of admission to the recovery unit and were similar between groups in the other time points. CONCLUSION: Administration of 1mgkg-1 ketamine after anesthesia induction does not affect the incidence of EA in patients undergoing septoplasty, but it prolongs the emergence and response time to verbal stimuli and reduces the incidence of cough.
Assuntos
Delírio do Despertar , Ketamina , Adulto , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Geral , Delírio do Despertar/epidemiologia , Delírio do Despertar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Agitação Psicomotora/epidemiologia , Agitação Psicomotora/etiologia , Agitação Psicomotora/prevenção & controle , SevofluranoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare lateral and midline epidural anaesthesia using a levobupivacaine-fentanyl combination in patients undergoing unilateral lower extremity operation for anaesthetic effects and postoperative complications. METHODS: The study included 40 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II group patients. At the L4-5 space, an epidural catheter was placed in patients in Group 1 by directing the tip of the needle at a 45-degree angle to the operation side and in Group 2 with the needle tip in the cephalad direction. Patients in both groups were administered a combination of 10 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine and 50 µg fentanyl via the epidural catheter. Sensorial and motor block levels during the perioperative and postoperative periods and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: The maximum level of sensory block on the operated side was found to be at the T10 (T8-T10) level in both groups, while the level of sensory block on the non-operated side was at the L2 (L3-T10) level in Group 1, and at the T10 (T8-T10) level in Group 2 (p=0.000). The motor block was more intense on the non-operated side in Group 2 than in Group 1. The postoperative motor block ended earlier in Group 1. The incidence of complication development was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: With a shorter lasting and lower level sensorial and motor block, lateral epidural anaesthesia may be a more advantageous method than midline epidural anaesthesia.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: I-gel is a new supraglottic airway device without an inflatable cuff. We aimed to compare I-gel and the classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) regarding the ease of use and clinical performance in Turkish population. METHODS: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I-gel and Group LMA. Insertion time and success in first attempt were recorded. Peak, plato and mean airway pressures, EtCO2, airway compliance and leak volume were periodically recorded during the operation. The presence of blood on device removal and postoperative sore throat were also assessed. RESULTS: The device insertion time in Group I-gel was shorter than that in Group LMA (21.00±4.15 vs. 30.40±12.17 s, p=0.001). The success rate in first attempt, peak, plato and mean airway pressures, EtCO2 and airway compliance did not differ between the groups. The leak volume was lower in Group I-gel 5 and 45 min after insertion (p=0.041 and p=0.027). The presence of blood on device removal and postoperative sore throat were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: I-gel may be a more advantageous supraglottic airway device compared with LMA.