Does optimal lesion preparation reduce the amount of acute recoil of the Absorbe BVS? Insights from a real-world population.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acute recoil of the ABSORB bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and its relationship with procedural characteristics in a real world population. BACKGROUND: In vivo acute recoil of the BVS was evaluated in selected patients. METHODS: Acute recoil was studied with videodensitometry in a consecutive series of patients treated by means of a BVS, and the results were compared with those obtained in subjects receiving an everolimus-eluting stent (EES). Recoil was defined as the difference between the mean diameter of the fully expanded balloon on which the device was mounted (or the mean diameter of the post-dilatation balloon), and the mean luminal diameter of the treated segment immediately after the final inflation. RESULTS: Recoil was assessed in 106 lesions treated with a BVS and 71 treated with an EES. The absolute and percent recoil of the BVS were significantly greater (0.32 ± 0.16 mm and 10% ± 5% vs. 0.17 ± 0.07 and 5% ± 3%; P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that BVS use was associated with acute recoil (ß = 0.477; P<0.001). Suboptimal lesion preparation (residual stenosis after balloon angioplasty >20%) (ß = 0.217; P = 0.027) and a small vessel reference diameter (ß = 0.335; P = 0.002) were associated with increased BVS but not EES recoil. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients, the acute recoil of the BVS was significantly greater than that of the metal EES. In the BVS group, residual stenosis after predilatation correlated with percent recoil, and so optimal lesion preparation seems to be mandatory in order to maximize the mechanical properties of the scaffold.

Five-Year Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting: A Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the popularity of less invasive approaches for conduits procurement in coronary artery bypass graft surgery, concerns have been raised about the potential detrimental effects of the endoscopic technique when compared with the conventional "open" technique. METHODS: Among 470 patients undergoing coronary surgery with the use of a radial artery conduit, a propensity score analysis was performed among those patients assigned either to an open technique (n = 82) or to an endoscopic approach (n = 82). Endoscopic harvesting was performed with a nonsealed system. The primary endpoint was cardiac-related mortality, and secondary endpoint was survival free from major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events. Moreover, hand and forearm sensory discomfort and forearm wound healing were also assessed. RESULTS: No conversion to the open technique occurred in patients undergoing endoscopic harvesting. No patients in either group showed hand ischemia; wound infection occurred only in the open group (open 7.3% versus endoscopic 0%, p = 0.007). Wound healing (Hollander scale) was considerably better in the endoscopic group (open 3.3, endoscopic 4.7; p < 0.001) as well as paresthesia at the latest follow-up (open 19.5% versus endoscopic 3.6%, p < 0.001). Pain (visual analog scale score) was significantly reduced with the endoscopic technique (open 3.2, endoscopic 1.2; p = 0.003). At 5 years of follow-up, freedom from cardiac-related mortality (open 96.3% ± 2.1% versus endoscopic 98.1% ± 1.8%; p = 0.448) as well as survival free from major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events (open 93.9% ± 2.6% versus endoscopic 93% ± 3.4%; p = 0.996) were similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting allows for incremental benefits in the short term in terms of improved cosmesis and reduced wound and neurologic complications, without yielding detrimental effects in terms of graft-related events at 5 years of follow-up.

Recurrent very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis.

In-stent thrombosis is a severe and potentially fatal event. The incidence of this pathological process does not differ significantly after implantation of either bare metal or drug-eluting stents (DESs) in the first month after intervention, but stent thrombosis (ST) continues to occur over a long period of time after implantation of DESs, a phenomenon known as late and very late ST. Multiple predictors of late ST have been identified, and among others, patient's adherence to medical therapy as well as an optimal interventional technique of stent implantation emerge as crucial variables. Scarce data is available about the occurrence of recurrent very late ST. We report three cases of recurrent very late thrombosis of first generation DESs in middle-aged patients with different degrees of coronary artery disease, presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Usefulness of ultrasonographic markers of carotid atherosclerosis (intima-media thickness, unstable carotid plaques and severe carotid stenosis) for predicting presence and extent of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of carotid ultrasound evaluation in predicting the presence and the extent of coronary artery disease in a consecutive series of patients. DESIGN: We examined retrospectively 1337 patients in whom both coronary angiography and carotid ultrasound were evaluated, from 1995 to 2005. Markers of carotid artery disease were considered, such as intima-media thickness more than 0.90 mm, unstable plaque and severe stenosis (> or =70%). Carotid risk score was defined as the sum of these parameters. We considered as affected by significant coronary artery disease those patients with at least one lesion more than 50% within the main branches of the coronary arteries. RESULTS: The markers of carotid atherosclerosis increased proportionally in patients with one-, two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease. At univariate analysis, intima-media thickness more than 0.90 mm was associated with an odds ratio of coronary artery disease of 2.28 (1.8-2.9) (P < 0.0001), unstable plaque 3.6 (2.3-5.7) (P < 0.001) and severe carotid stenosis 4.2 (2.0-8.7) (P = 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, the three markers mentioned above were independent risk factors for coronary artery disease even when considering other risk factors. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the usefulness of carotid ultrasound evaluation in predicting the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Considering the high correlation between carotid and coronary artery disease, carotid screening is useful in patients with coronary artery disease. In patients with an occasional finding of a carotid risk score of at least 2, a careful search for coronary artery disease seems warranted.

Percutaneous Impella Recover circulatory support in high-risk coronary angioplasty.

Due to the increased life expectancy derived from better conditions of life and improved medical technology, interventional cardiologists are facing challenging procedures in older and much more delicate patients, in whom percutaneous coronary intervention is generally considered less dangerous than cardiac surgery. We present two recent cases of high-risk complete myocardial revascularization in patients older than 80 years assisted by the Impella Recover 2.5. In our initial experience this device proved to be relatively easy to set up and hemodynamically useful for patients with left ventricular dysfunction and end-stage coronary atherosclerosis.