Empowering nurses through inclusive leadership to promote research capacity building: A James Lind Alliance priority setting Partnership in Community Nursing.

AIMS: This paper focuses on the benefits of inclusive leadership when undertaking a priority setting partnership in community nursing, through providing a collaborative and committed nurse-led forum for initiating impactful changes, identifying evidence uncertainties and driving research capacity-building initiatives. DESIGN: This is a Discussion paper. The project was undertaken between 2020 and 2021. DATA SOURCES: This paper is based on shared reflections as 70@70 Senior Nurse Research Leaders and is supported by literature and theory. It draws on issues relating to collective leadership, stakeholder engagement, diversity, inclusivity and COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership catalysed the development of a rigorous evidence-base in community nursing. The collaborative opportunities, networks and connections developed with patients, carers, nursing leaders, policy makers and healthcare colleagues raised the profile of community nursing research. This will benefit nursing research, practice, education and patients in receipt of community nursing care. Collective buy in from national leaders in policy, education, funding and commissioning has secured a commitment that the evidence uncertainties will be funded. CONCLUSION: Four key learnings emerged: collective leadership can ensure learning is embedded and sustained; developing an engaged stakeholder community to promote community nursing research is essential; a diverse membership ensures inclusivity and representation; and insights into the impact of COVID-19 aid progress. The process increased research engagement and created capacity and capability-building initiatives. This will help community nurses feel empowered to lead changes to practice. Sustained engagement and commitment are required to integrate research priorities into community nursing research, education and practice and to drive forward changes to commissioning and service delivery. IMPACT: The study promoted research capacity building through inclusive leadership. This can increase community nurses' research engagement and career development and patient care quality and safety; this can incentivize funders and policy makers to prioritize community nursing research.

The productive ward: encouraging teambuilding and innovation.

The aim of the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement's Productive Ward series is to remove wasteful activities from ward processes and reinvest the time saved in making care more interactive, stimulating, reliable and safe. This article describes how the introduction of Productive Ward on one unit in a mental health trust has delivered improvements in general ward organisation and a range of ward processes, and has motivated and empowered team members to make changes and innovate. The article also describes leadership and teamworking lessons that the ward matron and project facilitator have learnt.

Prison in-reach mental health nursing.

Surveys have shown that over 90 per cent of the prison population have a diagnosable mental illness, substance abuse problem, or both (ONS 1998). There is general agreement that although there are areas where practice is excellent, practice is not consistent across England and Wales, and often does not equate to standards in the NHS. In 2001 the Department of Health and the prison service set out their joint approach to the modernization of mental health services in prisons (DoH 2001), and proposed mental health in-reach as a means of improving services and achieving the objectives of the NHS Plan (DoH 2000). This article looks at the one of the first prison in-reach services that was launched at HMP Leicester early in 2002, and considers the effect these nurses have had on the care of mentally ill adults at the prison. A case study outlining the in-reach team's approach to one of the prison's greatest challenges, self-harm, is also included.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of night pain.

BACKGROUND: Night pain is a significant problem for many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but clinicians often overlook it. This study aimed to explore the issue of night pain among patients with RA both at home and in the hospital setting. METHODS: This was a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews among 8 hospital inpatients with established RA. Each interview was recorded, transcribed, and underwent framework analysis. RESULTS: The following themes were identified: Night pain in RA is a significant problem both at home and in hospital. All patients had established routines that they used in the home setting when disturbed by night pain. This often included getting out of bed and walking around, making hot drinks, and/or taking extra painkillers. These activities were often curtailed in the hospital setting for fear of disturbing other patients or the nurses. The effect of disturbed sleep and night pain on other people, be it partners or family members at home or patients and nurses in the hospital, was raised by all interviewees. CONCLUSION: Night pain in particular appears harder to control in the hospital setting than at home, and some of this may stem from lack of a tailored routine and fears of disturbing others. Information could be provided when patients are first admitted to the ward. This could describe or orient patients to the facilities available, which may be beneficial in the management of night pain. Further work on identifying influences upon night pain needs to be undertaken.