Diagnostic Utility of Mucosal Biopsies Taken During Colonoscopy-Guided Colonic Manometry Catheter Placement.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic utility of mucosal biopsies taken during colonoscopy-guided colonic manometry catheter placement is unknown. The aims of our study were to determine the frequency and histopathology results of mucosal biopsies during these procedures and to assess whether there were any associations between the histology or gross findings with manometry results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of children who had a colonic manometry study completed between 2008 and 2020 at a quaternary children's hospital. We captured patient demographics, biopsy locations, histopathology results, gross endoscopy findings, and manometry results. The chi-squared test and when appropriate Fisher exact test was used to evaluate categorical associations. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included. One hundred eighteen (80%) had colonic biopsy and 63 (43%) had ileal biopsy. Colonic histology findings, which patients could have multiple, included lymphonodular hyperplasia (34%), normal (27%), chronic inflammation (24%), melanosis coli (21%), colonic eosinophilia (10%), and acute inflammation (8%). Ileal histology findings included increased Peyer patches (44%), normal (44%), acute inflammation (11%), chronic inflammation (3%), eosinophilia (5%), and eosinophilic ileitis (3%). The majority of acute and chronic inflammation was graded as mild. There were no statistically significant associations of histology to gross endoscopy or manometry findings. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic biopsies are obtained in the majority of patients presenting for colonic manometry evaluation with ileal biopsies obtained less frequently. Histopathology findings are noted frequently, but the majority are the result of or did not impact clinical care. There were no associations between abnormal histopathology or abnormal gross endoscopy findings with colonic manometry results.

Gastrojejunal Enteral Tube Serving as a Small Bowel Bezoar Nidus.

Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement is indicated in the management of gastric feeding-related intolerance. Though uncommon, GJ complications may occur. We present the case of a five-year-old male with congenital heart disease in which image-guided replacement of a GJ tube was unable to be completed due to a mass adhered to the tip of the tube. The subsequent endoscopic evaluation identified the mass as a hair-based bezoar and the tube was successfully removed. The child was subsequently diagnosed with trichotillomania, trichophagia, and pica. This case illustrates the importance of recognizing bezoar formation as a potential complication of GJ enteric tubes, particularly in children with trichophagia and pica.

Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography.

BACKGROUND: Neuroangiographic techniques (diagnostic and interventional) can be lengthy and complex and can be associated with high radiation entrance skin doses from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). OBJECTIVE: To measure entrance surface doses received by pediatric patients undergoing neuroangiographic procedures and to (1) compare these doses with thresholds for deterministic effects, (2) compare these doses with those reported in adults, and (3) to understand the dose relationships among diagnostic and interventional procedures, DSA and fluoroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A neurobiplane unit with fluoroscopic and DSA capabilities was used for all neuroangiographic procedures. An automated patient dosimeter, installed on both planes of the unit, calculated maximum surface dose. The dosimeter also recorded the number of angiographic frames and the length of fluoroscopy time for each procedure. RESULTS: This retrospective study analyzed entrance surface doses to 100 pediatric patients, 76 of whom underwent neuroangiographic diagnostic procedures and 24 of whom underwent neuroangiographic interventional procedures. The DSA acquisitions ranged from 44 frames to 1,428 frames per procedure and fluoroscopy times ranged from 1.1 to 85.6 min per procedure. The mean surface dose from fluoroscopy was 68.1 mGy (max: 397.1 mGy) in the frontal (PA) plane; in the lateral (LAT) plane, the mean surface dose was 40.9 mGy (max: 418.5 mGy). The mean surface doses from DSA were 263.1 and 126.9 mGy in the frontal and lateral planes, with maximum doses of 924.4 and 410.1 mGy, respectively. Mean fluoroscopy dose rates were 5.4 mGy/min in the PA plane and 4.7 mGy/min in the LAT plane. The DSA largely contributed to the overall procedural surface dose, accounting for 82% of the combined surface dose in the each of the imaging planes. CONCLUSION: The surface dose for each procedure measured in this study was found to be below thresholds for deterministic effects. Interventional procedures consistently yield the highest doses.