RESUMO
Background and Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to understand the factors affecting disease severity. Prior research has indicated the potential roles of the ABO blood group system in disease susceptibility and progression. Our objective was to investigate the association between ABO Blood groups and the severity of COVID-19 and clinicopathological parameters. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted across three locations of Ziauddin University Hospital, including COVID-19 outpatient departments (OPDs), wards, and intensive care units (ICUs) from May 2020 to December 2020.The study utilized a non-probability convenient sampling technique with a sample size of 120 PCR-positive adult patients, as calculated by OpenEpi with a 95% confidence interval. Patients were excluded if they were under 14, intellectually impaired, post-chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or had a malignant condition. Disease severity was determined based on clinicopathological parameters and associated with blood group data using ANOVA and Chi-square tests in SPSS version 21. Results: A significant association was found between the ABO blood groups and COVID-19 severity. Blood group-A was notably overrepresented in patients with severe COVID-19 and correlated with higher inflammatory markers and coagulation parameters. Conclusion: ABO blood group, particularly Blood Group-A significantly associates with the severity of COVID-19. This finding suggests the potential utility of ABO blood group typing as a predictive marker for disease severity, which could contribute to personalized patient management strategies. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying this association.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer is characterized by diverse genetic mutations that influence disease progression and treatment response. This study was launched to explore the genetic basis of prostate cancer patients. METHODS: We employed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to analyze 14 cancer-susceptible genes in prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Our study identified genetic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and PMS2. In BRCA1 gene, we identified two pathogenic mutations, c.181T>G (p.Cys61Gly) and c.2457delC (p.Ala819fs), found in 10 patients, along with three benign mutations, c.5357T>G (p.Leu1786Arg), c.1111T>C (p.Leu371Pro), and c.1201C>G (p.Thr401Arg), present in 13, 11, and 15 patients, respectively. For the BRCA2 gene, one pathogenic mutation, c.6275_6276del (p.Val2092fs), was detected in 10 patients, and four benign mutations, c.5347A>T (p.Met1783Leu), c.5198A>G (p.Asp1733Gly), c.5158A>G (p.Thr1720Ala), and c.5117G>C (p.Gly1706Ala), were found in 17, 21, 34, and 12 patients, respectively. In the TP53 gene, we found two pathogenic mutations, c.1014_1015insT (p.Glu339Ter) and c.916C>T (p.Arg306Ter), in 10 and 11 patients, respectively, and two benign mutations, c.311T>C (p.Ser104Pro) and c.1129C>T (p.Arg377Cys), in 8 and 9 patients, respectively. Lastly, the PMS2 gene exhibited 16 benign mutations. Notably, the detected pathogenic mutations are rare in the broader Asian population according to the gnomAD database. Functional analyses using RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry showed decreased expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 in samples with pathogenic mutations, corroborating their impact on tumor suppressor function. Furthermore, drug sensitivity analysis revealed that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are associated with increased sensitivity to a range of chemotherapeutic agents, supporting the concept of synthetic lethality. However, TP53 did not significantly impact drug sensitivity. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive analysis emphasizes the critical roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and PMS2 in prostate cancer pathogenesis and highlights the importance of population-specific genetic screening.