Clinical Monitoring of Sacrococcygeal Teratoma.

BACKGROUND: Sacrococcygeal teratomas (SCT) are often highly vascularized and may result in high-output cardiac failure, polyhydramnios, fetal hydrops, and demise. Delivery is guided by the SCT to fetus volume ratio (SCTratio), SCT growth rate, and cardiac output indexed for weight (CCOi). METHODS: We compared measurements and outcome in 12 consecutive fetuses referred with SCT. Adverse outcomes were: fetal surgery, delivery < 32 gestational weeks or neonatal demise. Only SCTratio and CCOi were used to manage the cases. SCT vascularization index (VI%) was derived from the 3D virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) software. The SCTModel (modified from acardiac twins) calculated a hypothetical SCT draining vein size and derived a risk line, using diameters of the superior and inferior vena cava, the azygous and umbilical veins. VI% and a model of systemic and umbilical venous volumes (SCTModel) were tested as indicators for outcome in SCT. RESULTS: Fetuses were monitored from 20.1 to 36.4 gestational weeks and 5/12 had adverse outcomes: 1 had successful open fetal surgery at 23.8 weeks and delivered at term, 4 delivered at < 32 weeks with 3/4 having neonatal demise between 25 and 29 weeks. VI% was significantly higher in cases with adverse outcomes (mean 10.3 [8.9-11.6] vs. 4.4 [3.4-5.3], p < 0.0001). The additional fraction of the fetal cardiac output required to perfuse the SCT-draining vein (XSCO%) (p = 0.46), SCTratio (p = 0.08), and CCOi (p = 0.64) were not significant. All cases with adverse outcome had VI% > 8%. The SCTModel risk line predicted nonadverse outcomes well but lacked data in 2/5 cases with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: VI% is a significant indicator of SCT cases with adverse outcomes and combined with SCTratio may guide timing of delivery better than current measures.

Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data.

OBJECTIVE: Determine maternity hospital and lesion-specific prenatal detection rates of major congenital heart disease (mCHD) for hospitals referring prenatally and postnatally to one Congenital Cardiac Centre, and assess interhospital relative performance (relative risk, RR). METHODS: We manually linked maternity data (3 hospitals prospectively and another 16 retrospectively) with admissions, fetal diagnostic and surgical cardiac data from one Congenital Cardiac Centre. This Centre submits verified information to National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR-Congenital), which publishes aggregate antenatal diagnosis data from infant surgical procedures. We included 120 198 unselected women screened prospectively over 11 years in 3 maternity hospitals (A, B, C). Hospital A: colocated with fetal medicine, proactive superintendent, on-site training, case-review and audit, hospital B: on-site training, proactive superintendent, monthly telemedicine clinics, and hospital C: sonographers supported by local obstetrician. We then studied 321 infants undergoing surgery for complete transposition (transposition of the great arteries (TGA), n=157) and isolated aortic coarctation (CoA, n=164) screened in hospitals A, B, C prospectively, and 16 hospitals retrospectively. RESULTS: 385 mCHD recorded prospectively from 120 198 (3.2/1000) screened women in 3 hospitals. Interhospital relative performance (RR) in Hospital A:1.68 (1.4 to 2.0), B:0.70 (0.54 to 0.91), C:0.65 (0.5 to 0.8). Standardised prenatal detection rates (funnel plots) demonstrating inter-hospital variation across 19 hospitals for TGA (37%, 0.00 to 0.81) and CoA (34%, 0.00 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Manually linking data sources produced hospital-specific and lesion-specific prenatal mCHD detection rates. More granular, rather than aggregate, data provides meaningful feedback to improve screening performance. Automatic maternal and infant record linkage on a national scale, requires verified, prospective maternity audit and integration of health information systems.