Clopidogrel Vs Aspirin Monotherapy Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by aspirin monotherapy indefinitely. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin in the post-PCI population after completing DAPT. We systematically searched 5 electronic databases to identify studies comparing clopidogrel with aspirin following completion of DAPT after PCI. We pooled outcomes for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We included 5 studies with 13,850 patients, of whom 5601 (40.4%) received clopidogrel. Mean follow-up was 12-36 months. All patients received drug-eluting stents. Duration of DAPT before antiplatelet monotherapy was 1-18 months. Clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE (Risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.91), any stroke (RR 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.76), ischemic stroke (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.94), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.68) when compared with aspirin. Cardiac death (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.53-1.41), all-cause death (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.81-1.39), major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.43-1.29), MI (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64-1.60), repeat revascularization (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.09), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-1.13), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.35-2.59) were not significantly different among groups. Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE and stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) following DAPT completion after PCI. There were no significant differences in mortality, major bleeding, MI, and repeat revascularization between groups.

Use of coronary artery calcium and coronary tomography angiography in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease.

Over the years, significant technological advances have been made in the field of cardiac CT imaging which has led to the widespread use of the modality in the evaluation of ischemic and structural heart disease. The advent of newer scanning techniques has led to a reduction in scanning time as well as a reduction in the radiation and contrast media dose required - making these scans both convenient and safer to perform. Research has shown that coronary CT angiography has a high negative predictive value in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. There is more recent evidence that coronary CTA has a positive impact on clinical outcomes as well. In this review article, we discuss the clinical applications of coronary CTA in the evaluation of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, the most recent studies evaluating the efficacy and limitations of the modality, the role of coronary calcium in cardiovascular risk prediction in asymptomatic patients and the future applications of the modality.