Bloodstream infections due to multi-drug resistant bacteria in the emergency department: prevalence, risk factors and outcomes-a retrospective observational study.

Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are prevalent in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) and increase the risk of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy. Risk stratification for MDRO infection is essential to early identify patients requiring empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, but it remains challenging for emergency physicians. This study aimed to evaluate prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients admitted to the ED with a bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by MDROs. A retrospective observational study enrolling all consecutive adult patients admitted with a BSI to the ED of Niguarda Hospital, Italy, from January 2019 to December 2021 was performed. 757 patients were enrolled, 14.1% with septic shock. 156 (20%) patients had a BSI caused by MDRO: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales were the most prevalent followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Risk factors for BSI due to MDRO and specifically for ESBL were chronic renal failure (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.4-3.6), nursing home residency (OR 4.4; 95%CI 1.9-10.2) and antibiotic therapy in the last 90-days (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.7-4), whereas for MRSA were dialysis (OR 12.3; 95%CI 1.8-83), antibiotic therapy and/or hospital admission in the past 90-days (OR 3.6; 95%CI 1.2-10.6) and ureteral stent or nephrostomy (OR 7.8; 95%CI 1.5-40.9). Patients with BSI due to MDRO had a higher rate of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (50%) and longer length of stay, but no higher in-hospital mortality. Among patients admitted to the ED with a BSI, MDROs are frequent and often associated with inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy. Specific updated risk factors for MDRO may help clinicians to better identify patients requiring a broader antibiotic therapy in the ED, while awaiting microbiological results.

Safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life of self-administration with plasma-derived nanofiltered C1 inhibitor (Berinert®) in patients with hereditary angioedema: the SABHA study.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency is a disabling, potentially fatal condition characterized by recurrent episodes of swelling. Self-treatment is recommended, in order to reduce admissions to the Emergency Room and the time between the onset of the attack and the treatment, resulting in a better treatment outcome and an improved quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and effect on QoL of self-administration of pnf C1-INH for IV use (Berinert®). METHODS: An observational, monocenter, prospective study was designed. Patients referring to a center for angioedema that attended two sessions of self-infusion training course in the period March 2014-July 2015 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was to monitor the safety and feasibility of pnf C1-INH self-infusion. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of self-infusion on the QoL, by means of the HAE-QoL questionnaire and the need for access to Emergency Room for infusion of Berinert®. Patients' medical history data were collected upon the first visit and questionnaires were filled after each attack treated with Berinert® (diary and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) and upon the first visit and the follow-ups (HAE-QoL). RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled (median age = 42, IQR: 39-49; 60% females). Fifteen patients completed the study. A total of 189 attacks were recorded (annual median rate of 4 attacks/patient). Patients waited a median of 2 h (IQR: 1-4) before self-administration, and the resolution of the attack occurred after a median of 6 h (IQR: 4-11). Most attacks were abdominal (39%) and peripheral (22%). 92% of the attacks were treated through self-/caregiver-administration. In most attacks no side effects were reported. The number of attacks with side effects decreased over time, from 37% to 13%. Global satisfaction grew over time during the study period, reaching statistical significance over the first 6 months. The median total HAE-QoL score at baseline was 86 (IQR: 76-103) and improved in a non-significant manner throughout the study period. 8% of the attacks treated with Berinert® required ER admission/healthcare professional help in the study period, compared with 100% in the 3 years before enrollment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Self-administration of pnf C1-INH is safe, and increases patients' confidence in the treatment, showing also a trend towards an improvement in QoL. It reduces the need for ER admission/healthcare professionals help for the acute attacks, as well as the related costs.

Therapeutic Approach to Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies in the Emergency Room.

Hypertensive urgencies-emergencies are important and common events. They are defined as a severe elevation in BP, higher than 180/120 mmHg, associated or not with the evidence of new or worsening organ damage for emergencies and urgencies respectively. Anamnestic information, physical examination and instrumental evaluation determine the following management that could need oral (for urgencies) or intravenous (for emergencies) anti-hypertensives drugs. The choice of the specific drugs depend on the underlying causes of the crisis, patient's demographics, cardiovascular risk and comorbidities. For emergencies a maximum BP reduction of 20-25% within the first hour and then to 160/110-100 over next 2-6 h, is considered appropriate with a further gradual decrease over the next 24-48 h to reach normal BP levels. In the case of hypertensive urgencies, a gradual lowering of BP over 24-48 h with an oral medication is the best approach and an aggressive BP lowering should be avoided. Subsequent management with particular attention on chronic BP values control is important as the right treatment of the acute phase.

Diagnosis, Course, and Management of Angioedema in Patients With Acquired C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Acquired angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-AAE) is a rare disease with no prevalence data or approved therapies. OBJECTIVE: To report data on patients with C1-INH-AAE followed at Angioedema Center, Milan (from 1976 to 2015). METHODS: Diagnostic criteria included history of recurrent angioedema without wheals; decreased C1-INH antigen levels and/or functional activity of C1-INH and C4 antigen less than 50% of normal; late symptom onset (>40 years); no family history of angioedema and C1-INH deficiency. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients (58% females; median age, 70 years) were diagnosed with C1-INH-AAE and 675 patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) (1 patient with C1-INH-AAE/8.8 patients with C1-INH-HAE). Median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Median time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 2 years. Sixteen patients (21%) died since diagnosis, including 1 because of laryngeal edema. Angioedema of the face was most common (N = 63 [82%]), followed by abdomen (N = 51 [66%]), peripheries (N = 50 [65%]), and oral mucosa and/or glottis (N = 42 [55%]). Forty-eight of 71 patients (68%) had autoantibodies to C1-INH. In total, 56 patients (70%) used on-demand treatment for angioedema including intravenous pdC1-INH 2000 U (Berinert, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) (N = 49) and/or subcutaneous icatibant 30 mg (Firazyr, Shire; Milano, Italy) (N = 27). Eventually, 8 of 49 patients receiving pdC1-INH became nonresponsive; all had autoantibodies. Thirty-four patients received long-term prophylaxis with tranexamic acid (effective in 29) and 20 with androgens (effective in 8). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of C1-INH-AAE was 1 for every 8.8 patients with C1-INH-HAE. Thirty percent of the deaths were related to the disease. Treatments approved for C1-INH-HAE are effective in C1-INH-AAE, although with minimal differences.