RESUMO
UNLABELLED: With the aging population, elderly patients with degenerative, severely calcified, and symptomatic aortic stenosis are becoming a frequent problem in medical decision making, particularly because many are declined for surgical valve replacement. For these patients, balloon aortic dilatation could be a palliative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: we analyzed retrospectively our techniques and complications during hospitalization for percutaneous aortic balloon dilatation in 141 consecutive patients (45% women, mean age 83 +/- 10 y) from January 2002 to April 2005. The Parsonnet's score was 41 +/- 8 and the Euroscore was 10 +/- 2. We excluded the patients enrolled for percutaneous aortic valve implantation. This technique was performed under local anesthesia, from retrograde or antegrade approach. Rapid pacing stimulation (220/bpm) with a pacing-lead placed in the right ventricle was performed during balloon inflation. RESULTS: the aortic valve area was increased from 0.59 +/- 0.19 to 1.02 +/- 0.34 cm2 (p < 0.001) and the transvalvular mean gradient decreased from 49.3 +/- 21.2 to 22.2 +/- 11.8 mmHg (p < 0.001). Six patients (4%) died (3 during aortic valve dilatation) and 9 patients (6%) had non fatal complications: 2 transitory strokes, 8 non surgical vascular complications and 5 episodes of atrio-ventricular complete block (these complication were non exclusive). The patients were discharged at 5, 6 +/- 3 days. CONCLUSION: In the hands of skilled operators, aortic percutaneous balloon dilatation has become a simple technique, associated with a low risk of complications despite a very ill patient population. This technique remains a good option for a number of patients before the onset of percutaneous aortic valve implantation.