Surgeon Gender and Early Complications in Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between surgeon gender and early postoperative complications, including 30-day death and readmission, in elective surgery. BACKGROUND: Variations between male and female surgeon practice patterns may be a source of bias and gender inequality in the surgical field, perhaps impacting quality of care. However, there are limited and conflicting studies regarding the association between surgeon gender and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched in October 2023 for observational studies including patients who underwent elective surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia across multiple surgical specialties. Multiple independent blinded reviewers oversaw the data selection, extraction, and quality assessment according to the PRISMA, MOOSE, and Newcastle Ottawa Scale guidelines. Data were pooled as odds ratios, using a generic inverse-variance random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 944 abstracts screened, 11 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 4,440,740 postoperative patients were assessed for a composite primary outcome of mortality, readmission, and other complications within 30 days of elective surgery, with a total of 325,712 (7.3%) surgeries performed by 7,072 (10.9%) female surgeons. There was no association between surgeon gender and the composite of mortality, readmission, and/or complications (odds ratio=0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00; I2=64.9%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results support that surgeon gender is not associated with early postoperative outcomes, including mortality, readmission, or other complications in elective surgery. These findings encourage patients, healthcare providers, and stakeholders not to consider surgeon gender as a risk factor for postoperative complications.

History and background of quality measurement.

Health care quality measurement has become increasingly emphasized, as providers and administrators respond to public and government demands for improved patient care. This article will review the evolution of surgical quality measurement and improvement from its infancy in the 1850s to the vast efforts being undertaken today.

The clinical impact of preoperative percutaneous drainage of abdominopelvic abscesses in patients with Crohn's disease.

PURPOSE: Although image-guided percutaneous drainage is increasingly being used to treat Crohn's disease-related abdominopelvic abscesses, surgery is seldom avoided. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes following the treatment of intra-abdominal Crohn's abscesses with percutaneous drainage followed by surgery to those after surgery alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients treated for Crohn's-related abdominopelvic abscesses at Mount Sinai Medical Center between April 2001 and June 2010. Patients who underwent drainage followed by surgery were compared to those who underwent surgery alone. Differences in operative and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients with Crohn's disease-related abdominopelvic abscesses were identified, 38 (54%) of whom underwent drainage before surgery. Percutaneous drainage was technically successful in 92% of patients and clinically successful in 74% of patients. No differences in rate of septic complications (p = 0.14) or need for stoma creation (p = 0.78) were found. Patients who underwent percutaneous drainage had greater overall hospital lengths of stay (mean 15.8 versus 12.2 days, p = 0.007); 8.6% of patients had long-term postponement of surgery after percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, the treatment of Crohn's abscesses with percutaneous drainage prior to surgery did not decrease the rate of postoperative septic complications.