Exposure to Stress Alters Cardiac Gene Expression and Exacerbates Myocardial Ischemic Injury in the Female Murine Heart.

Mental stress is a risk factor for myocardial infarction in women. The central hypothesis of this study is that restraint stress induces sex-specific changes in gene expression in the heart, which leads to an intensified response to ischemia/reperfusion injury due to the development of a pro-oxidative environment in female hearts. We challenged male and female C57BL/6 mice in a restraint stress model to mimic the effects of mental stress. Exposure to restraint stress led to sex differences in the expression of genes involved in cardiac hypertrophy, inflammation, and iron-dependent cell death (ferroptosis). Among those genes, we identified tumor protein p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21), which have established controversial roles in ferroptosis. The exacerbated response to I/R injury in restraint-stressed females correlated with downregulation of p53 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2, a master regulator of the antioxidant response system-ARE). S-female hearts also showed increased superoxide levels, lipid peroxidation, and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2) expression (a hallmark of ferroptosis) compared with those of their male counterparts. Our study is the first to test the sex-specific impact of restraint stress on the heart in the setting of I/R and its outcome.

Using the social vulnerability index to assess COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Louisiana.

Using data from the Louisiana Department of Public Health, we explored the spatial relationships between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and COVID-19-related vaccination and mortality rates. Publicly available COVID-19 vaccination and mortality data accrued from December 2020 to October 2021 was downloaded from the Louisiana Department of Health website and merged with the SVI data; geospatial analysis was then performed to identify the spatial association between the SVI and vaccine uptake and mortality rate. Bivariate Moran's I analysis revealed significant clustering of high SVI ranking with low COVID-19 vaccination rates (1.00, p < 0.001) and high smoothed mortality rates (0.61, p < 0.001). Regression revealed that for each 10% increase in SVI ranking, COVID-19 vaccination rates decreased by 3.02-fold (95% CI = 3.73-2.30), and mortality rates increased by a factor of 1.19 (95% CI = 0.99-1.43). SVI values are spatially linked and significantly associated with Louisiana's COVID-19-related vaccination and mortality rates. We also found that vaccination uptake was higher in whites than in blacks. These findings can help identify regions with low vaccination rates and high mortality, enabling the necessary steps to increase vaccination rates in disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Contemporary diagnosis and management of severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Many novel percutaneous interventions are being developed for application in the tricuspid valve position. At the present time in the United States, there are no commercially available transcathter devices for this application. This article reviews the growing evidence for diagnosing, imaging, and treating severe tricuspid regurgitation as well as the surgical and transcatheter options that are under current development and in various stages of clinical trials.

Review of Prosthetic Paravalvular Leaks: Diagnosis and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively uncommon complication associated with prosthetic valve implantation. PVL can occasionally lead to serious adverse consequences such as congestive heart failure, infective endocarditis, and hemolytic anemia. Surgical re-operation carries a high mortality risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Transcatheter closure therapy provides a viable alternative for the treatment of this disorder with reasonable procedural and clinical success. The recent advent of hybrid imaging modalities has increased procedural success. This article summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment modalities surroundings prosthetic paravalvular leak.

Associations between calf, thigh, and arm circumference and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in NHANES 1999-2004.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prior studies have described an association between calf circumference and cardiovascular disorders. We evaluated the associations between calf, thigh, and arm circumference and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 11,871 patients in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to determine the association between calf circumference and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards. We additionally examined the association between thigh and arm circumference and mortality. In the multivariable Cox regression for the female stratum, each centimeter increase in calf circumference was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92), and a hazard ratio of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95) for cardiovascular death. In the model with males, the hazard ratio for higher calf circumference was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.96) for all-cause mortality and 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.99) for cardiovascular death. There was a statistically significant association between higher thigh circumference and lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Arm circumference was not similarly associated with mortality in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Calf and thigh circumference may provide important prognostic information regarding cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Future prospective studies should examine the role of extremity circumference and cardiovascular events.

Correction to: Update on Devices for Diastolic Dysfunction: Options for a No Option Condition?

In the original publication, the author name "Amit Gupta" was incorrectly spelled as "Ahmit Gupta". The original article has been corrected.

Update on Devices for Diastolic Dysfunction: Options for a No Option Condition?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides an update on percutaneous devices to treat diastolic dysfunction, current clinical experience, and actively enrolling trials. We also discuss potential complications and limitations of devices. RECENT FINDINGS: Exertional symptoms including exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance are common features of heart failure that are driven by left ventricular and left atrial non-compliance that results in pulmonary vascular congestion. Multiple studies that have shown that reducing total body volume and intravascular pressure, using pharmacologic therapies, are associated with improved outcomes among patients who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (ejection fraction [EF] < 40%), but not heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (EF > 55%).This is related to the fact that HFpEF is associated with altered diastolic compliance but not volume overload, which presents as exertional increases in left atrial pressure. Exercise assessment of LA and pulmonary pressures are not commonly assessed today in the clinic or in the catheterization laboratory. As elevated left atrial pressure mediates these symptoms, selective reduction in left atrial pressure may provide improvement in symptoms without complications of pharmacologic therapy such as diuresis and aggressive blood pressure reduction. Mechanical devices that aim to reduce left atrial pressure have been developed and evaluated in HFpEF and HFrEF patients. The current data from the small number of patients who have undergone treatment with left atrial decompression devices indicate that they have a high rate of success and may improve patient's exercise capacity. Larger, controlled trials are underway to better understand the role of these devices in patients with diastolic dysfunction.

Contemporary practice patterns related to the risk of acute kidney injury in the catheterization laboratory: Results from a survey of Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) cardiologists.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to survey the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) member cardiologists to evaluate contemporary practice patterns with regards to contrast use, acute kidney injury (AKI) risk assessment, and prevention in patients undergoing invasive angiography. We sought to compare the physician responses against guideline statements and evidence-based data from clinical studies. METHODS: A 20-question online survey based on a modified Likert scale was sent out via email to the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) member cardiologists. The survey questions focused on prophylaxis methods, medication management, risk assessment, contrast agent use, and postprocedure care. A scoring system was developed which examined the individual responses to analyze the 10 questions with the greatest strength of evidence in the literature and guidelines. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 506 individuals. Selected responses of note included the use of standardized volume expansion protocols: 64.8%, use of iso-osmolar contrast (iodixanol) in the majority of patients at risk of AKI: 55%, and 27% of individuals reported diluting contrast with saline for patients at risk of AKI during coronary angiography. For questions with support from guideline documents, 56.9% of the responses were scored as concordant with evidence-based data. Individuals who reported that the risk of AKI was often or always important in planning angiography for "at risk patients" were more likely to closely monitor renal function (76.7% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.003), obtain nephrology consultation (45.2% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.016) and use iso-osmolar contrast agents (56.0% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cardiologists participating in this survey, reported practice patterns consistent with guideline and evidence-based recommendations. However, over 40% of responses to questions were inconsistent with these recommendations, suggesting continued opportunities for education and quality improvement concerning AKI prevention. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Revascularization Strategies in STEMI with Multivessel Disease: Deciding on Culprit Versus Complete-Ad Hoc or Staged.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will address the clinical conundrum of those who may derive clinical benefit from complete revascularization of coronary stenosis that are discovered at the time of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The decision to revascularize additional vessels with angiographic stenosis beyond the culprit lesion remains controversial, as does the timing of revascularization. RECENT FINDINGS: STEMI patients represent a high-risk patient population that have up to a 50% prevalence of multivessel disease. Multivessel disease represents an important risk factor for short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Potential benefits of multivessel PCI for STEMI might include reduced short- and long-term mortality, revascularization, reduced resource utilization, and costs. Which population will benefit and what the optimal timing of revascularization in the peri-MI period remains controversial. Consideration of multivessel revascularization in the setting of STEMI may occur in up to one half of STEMI patients. Evaluation of the comorbidities including diabetes, extent of myocardium at risk, lesion complexity, ventricular function, and risk factors for complications such as contrast induced nephropathy which is important in determining the appropriate care pathway.

Coronary and peripheral stenting in aorto-ostial protruding stents: The balloon assisted access to protruding stent technique.

Treatment of aorto-ostial in-stent restenosis lesions represents a challenge for interventional cardiologists. Excessive protrusion of the stent into the aorta may lead to multiple technical problems, such as difficult catheter reengagement of the vessel ostium or inability to re-wire through the stent lumen in repeat interventions. We describe a balloon assisted access to protruding stent technique in cases where conventional coaxial engagement of an aorto-ostial protruding stent with the guide catheter or passage of the guide wire through the true lumen is not feasible. This technique is applicable both in coronary and peripheral arteries.

The use of the AVERT system to limit contrast volume administration during peripheral angiography and intervention.

BACKGROUND: The AVERT(TM) Contrast Modulation System (AVERT) (Osprey Medical, MN) is designed to reduce contrast volume administration during angiography. The AVERT provides an adjustable resistance circuit which decreases the pressure head delivering contrast towards the patient. The AVERT has not been previously studied in patients undergoing peripheral digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate contrast savings with the AVERT and (2) to evaluate the ability to generate clinically acceptable DSA images in the process. To better define the mechanism of action in the peripheral circulation, we also developed a bench model to study the effects of the AVERT on the hydrodynamics of contrast delivery. METHODS: Patients undergoing lower extremity DSA (diagnostic or intervention, sheath or catheter) were studied. The following variables were recorded for each injection: starting control syringe contrast volume, contrast volume injected towards patient, contrast volume returned to AVERT reservoir, net contrast administered to the patient and % savings. The AVERT resistance was adjusted manually based on operator's discretion--balancing image quality and contrast savings. RESULTS: About 408 DSA angiographic sequences were obtained in 22 patients undergoing 29 procedures. Almost 68% of the patients had chronic kidney disease. An 82% presented with critical limb ischemia, 18% had claudication. There was an overall 37% ± 14% savings of contrast (31% for diagnostic DSA, 40% for interventional procedures). Overall 91% of all images were acceptable for clinical decision making. Specifically, 94% of diagnostic and 87% of interventional images were acceptable. Injection through a 4 Fr catheter (77% acceptable) resulted in poorer image quality as compared to a 5 Fr catheter (96% acceptable). Image quality for 5, 6, and 7 Fr sheath injections was 86%, 91%, 98%, respectively. The bench model of peripheral angiography demonstrated a significant reduction in reflux of contrast proximal to the end of the catheter without loss of antegrade image quality - confirming the in vivo findings. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that the use of the AVERT device during peripheral angiography results in significant contrast savings without compromising image quality.

ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of common clinical presentations for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) to consider use of stress testing and anatomic diagnostic procedures. This document reflects an updating of the prior Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) published for radionuclide imaging (RNI), stress echocardiography (Echo), calcium scoring, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography for SIHD. This is in keeping with the commitment to revise and refine the AUC on a frequent basis. A major innovation in this document is the rating of tests side by side for the same indication. The side-by-side rating removes any concerns about differences in indication or interpretation stemming from prior use of separate documents for each test. However, the ratings were explicitly not competitive rankings due to the limited availability of comparative evidence, patient variability, and range of capabilities available in any given local setting. The indications for this review are limited to the detection and risk assessment of SIHD and were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Eighty clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate rating panel on a scale of 1-9, to designate Appropriate, May Be Appropriate, or Rarely Appropriate use following a modified Delphi process following the recently updated AUC development methodology. The use of some modalities of testing in the initial evaluation of patients with symptoms representing ischemic equivalents, newly diagnosed heart failure, arrhythmias, and syncope was generally found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate, except in cases where low pre-test probability or low risk limited the benefit of most testing except exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). Testing for the evaluation of new or worsening symptoms following a prior test or procedure was found to be Appropriate. In addition, testing was found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate for patients within 90 days of an abnormal or uncertain prior result. Pre-operative testing was rated Appropriate or May Be Appropriate only for patients who had poor functional capacity and were undergoing vascular or intermediate risk surgery with 1 or more clinical risk factors or an organ transplant. The exercise ECG was suggested as an Appropriate test for cardiac rehabilitation clearance or for exercise prescription purposes. Testing in asymptomatic patients was generally found to be Rarely Appropriate, except for calcium scoring and exercise testing in intermediate and high-risk individuals and either stress or anatomic imaging in higher-risk individuals, which were all rated as May Be Appropriate. All modalities of follow-up testing after a prior test or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 2 years and within 5 years after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the absence of new symptoms were rated Rarely Appropriate. Pre-operative testing for patients with good functional capacity, prior normal testing within 1 year, or prior to low-risk surgery also were found to be Rarely Appropriate. Imaging for an exercise prescription or prior to the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation was Rarely Appropriate except for cardiac rehabilitation clearance for heart failure patients.