Derivation and validation of a predictive model for subtotal cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) are increasing in response to challenging cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to avoid bile duct injury, yet are associated with significant morbidity. The present study identifies risk factors for STC and both derives and validates a risk model for STC. METHODS: LC performed for all biliary pathology across three general surgical units were included (2015-2020). Clinicopathological, intraoperative and post-operative details were reported. Backward stepwise multivariable regression was performed to derive the most parsimonious predictive model for STC. Bootstrapping was performed for internal validation and patients were categorised into risk groups. RESULTS: Overall, 2768 patients underwent LC (median age, 53 years; median ASA, 2; median BMI, 29.7 kg/m2), including 99 cases (3.6%) of STC. Post-operatively following STC, there were bile leaks in 29.3%, collections in 19.2% and retained stones in 10.1% of patients. Post-operative intervention was performed in 29.3%, including ERCP (22.2%), laparoscopy (5.0%) and laparotomy (3.0%). The following variables were positive predictors of STC and were included in the final model: age > 60 years, male sex, diabetes mellitus, acute cholecystitis (AC), increased severity of AC (CRP > 90 mg/L), ≥ 3 biliary admissions, pre-operative ERCP with/without stent, pre-operative cholecystostomy and emergency LC (AUC = 0.84). Low, medium and high-risk groups had a STC rate of 0.8%, 3.9% and 24.5%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The present study determines the morbidity of STC and identifies high-risk features associated with STC. A risk model for STC is derived and internally validated to help surgeons identify high-risk patients and both improve pre-operative decision-making and patient counselling.

Implementing a unique immersive near-peer-led clinical skills educational bootcamp for early-year clinical medical students.

We establish the development of a unique immersive clinical skills bootcamp for third-year medical students, with formal teaching under five key themes: procedural skills day, examinations, imaging, data interpretation and prescribing. Lastly a simulation event was developed to allow the participants to bring the different themes together, in order to successfully manage an acutely unwell patient for their stage of learning using the newly learnt skills. A 4-week bootcamp was developed and delivered to students. A curriculum was developed based on student's precourse answers to specific questions. Pre and post bootcamp questionnaires were used to assess participants confidence and knowledge using a 5-point Likert scale. A combination of objective structured examination, didactic lectures and group-based discussions were utilised. Tutors' teaching performance was also analysed. A focus group was held post bootcamp. Bootcamp was delivered to 15 students. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Students were more confident in all of the five key domains post bootcamp. All students feel more equipped to take opportunities that arise on medical wards as a result of the skills learnt. Participants were receptive to the combination of teaching methods used. All students would recommend this course to their peers. Early-year clinical students successfully received an immersive goal-directed course with formal teaching. The near-peer teaching model improved participants educational experience. We were able to successfully demonstrate that near-peer teaching is effective when it is goal directed, and further when it addresses areas of medical education whereby there is a disparity in the formal teaching available.

Can a Fully Electronic Patient Record-Based Virtual Fracture Clinic Increase Compliance With British Orthopaedic Association Guidelines for the Assessment of Acute Orthopaedic Trauma Patients?

Introduction There is clear guidance for the follow-up of acute orthopaedic trauma patients within 72 hours of presentation as per British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) model has been adopted nationwide to increase compliance with these guidelines. Traditionally our VFC was paper-based, but recently it has been made completely electronic with the introduction of Hive which is a comprehensive electronic patient record (EPR). The aim of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Hive VFC and to see the impact it has on improving the patient experience. Methods Data was collected retrospectively by looking at referrals to the Hive VFC across a seven-month period from its date of introduction. No patients were excluded and data was collected for 2,158 patients. Patient demographics, referral details, and outcomes were recorded on a Microsoft Excel version 16.0 for Windows spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States). Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results Data was collected for 2,158 patients between September 9, 2022, and March 31, 2023, in the Hive VFC. The largest proportion of injuries was found in the foot and ankle region with 32% of referrals (n=688), followed by hand and wrist with 30% (n=651), upper limb with 28% (n=595), and lower limb with 7% (n=142). There was a 50.4% (n=125) increase in the number of patients seen in the VFC across the study period with 248 patients being seen in September 2022, increasing to 373 in March 2023. The number of patients with acute traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were assessed within 72 hours on average was 94.5% per month. There was an increase of 7.3% during the study period from September 2022 to March 2023, 89.9% to 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion We believe that Hive VFC is a clinically sound and effective way of assessing acute traumatic orthopaedic patients and increasing compliance with BOA and NICE guidelines. The number of patients needing acute orthopaedic assessment is rising steadily, and this should alert us to find more convenient, time and cost-saving methods of delivering safe and effective patient care.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Neck of Femur Fracture Service in a Tertiary Care Hospital in the United Kingdom.

Introduction The emergence of the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in late 2019 ushered in a global crisis that profoundly impacted healthcare systems worldwide. In the United Kingdom, COVID-19 resulted in a significant toll on public health and the National Health Service (NHS). As the virus surged, the NHS faced unprecedented challenges, including surges in COVID-19 cases, a dire need for medical equipment, and a strain on intensive care units. Simultaneously, stringent nationwide lockdowns were imposed to curb the virus's spread, disrupting daily life and healthcare access. Amid this crisis, the interactions between COVID-19 and other prevalent health conditions came to the forefront of medical research, sparking interest in understanding their connections. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between COVID-19 and neck of femur (NoF) fractures, exploring shared risk factors, resource implications, and potential alterations in patient pathways. Given the severity of both conditions and their impact on the vulnerable elderly population, elucidating these connections is crucial for comprehensive patient care and resource allocation within the healthcare system. Methods This study used data from the National Hip Fracture Audit (NHFA) database, focusing on NoF fracture patients at Wythenshawe Hospital. We examined two cohorts: pre-pandemic (from March 2019 to March 2020) and pandemic (from March 2020 to March 2021). We compared key parameters and incorporated COVID-19 data. Graphs showed trends and cohort similarities. We also analyzed demographic data (age, gender, fracture type, times, COVID-19 status, and mortality), removing outliers for accuracy. Results The data revealed that while certain factors such as patient age and mobilization remained largely unaffected, there was a modest association between COVID-19 incidence and NoF fracture patients. Notably, regional lockdown measures had a substantial impact on patient care. The initial lockdown effectively reduced COVID-19-positive cases upon admission but led to prolonged intervals and surgical delays. However, the second lockdown showed improvements, attributed to lessons learned, increased resource allocation, and better familiarity with hospital-specific lockdown measures. This research sheds light on the intricate relationship between a global pandemic and orthopedic patient care, highlighting the importance of adapting healthcare systems to evolving challenges. Conclusion This study explores the impact of COVID-19 on neck of femur (NoF) fracture patients, highlighting key findings from Wythenshawe Hospital. It uncovers a dynamic relationship between the pandemic and patient care, with increased COVID-19 cases coinciding with reduced NoF fracture rates. Lockdowns influenced outcomes, with the first causing delays and higher post-discharge mortality, while the second improved efficiency and safety. These insights extend beyond Wythenshawe Hospital, offering implications for healthcare practices in the United Kingdom and beyond, especially in countries with limited vaccination resources. This research underscores the need for tailored strategies to optimize NoF fracture patient outcomes during pandemics and lockdowns.

Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome: Can the Presence of an Orthopaedic Doctor in the Emergency Department Reduce Waiting Times for MRI Scans and Inpatient Stays?

Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a very rare but devastating surgical emergency that can lead to permanent bowel, bladder or sexual dysfunction and lower limb paralysis. Although it is a clinical syndrome, an MRI scan is a critical diagnostic investigation for these patients and should be done as soon as possible. Our hospital is a district general hospital with no spinal services on site. There is a protocol in place for the management of these patients locally with MRI scanning during daytime hours. However, if the patient presents after 8 pm, they are discussed with the tertiary spinal centre, which then advises if the patient requires transfer overnight for urgent scanning. Considering an MRI scan is a critical diagnostic step for these patients, we introduced a role for an orthopaedic doctor in the Emergency Department (ED) to assess all of these patients before collecting data for the second cycle. The aim of this audit was to see the effect of having an orthopaedic doctor in the ED for the assessment of these patients and its impact on waiting times and admission rates. Methods A closed-loop audit cycle was done looking into all referrals to trauma and orthopaedics with acute back pain and suspected CES in a district general hospital with no spinal services on site. The first cycle was between September 30, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and included 93 patients in total. Following this, a role for an orthopaedic doctor in ED was introduced from December 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022, for assessment of these patients. Data was then collected retrospectively for all patients referred during this period (n=36). Data was extracted from all relevant clinical systems including electronic patient record (EPR), Patient Pass (Patient Pass Ltd, Greater Manchester, England), which is the system used to digitally communicate with regional spinal services, and PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). The data was collated on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washinton, United States) and analysed. Results Data were collected for a total of 36 patients in the second cycle following the introduction of an orthopaedic doctor in the ED. The age of patients referred was 30-89 years with a mean age of 51; 44.4% were male (n=16) and 55.5% female (n=20). All the patients who were referred received their MRI scan and report within 24 hours of presentation to the ED. In the first cycle of the audit, the mean waiting time for an MRI scan had been 12.5 hours, which was reduced to eight hours following the introduction of an orthopaedic doctor in the ED during daytime hours. This was stratified further according to the time patients presented to the hospital. From 8 am to 4 pm, the mean waiting time for an MRI scan was 9.5 hours pre-intervention and 5.5 hours after. From 4 pm to 12 am, the mean waiting time was 18 hours before and 13 hours after, and from 12 am to 8 am, the waiting time for scans improved from 8.5 hours to 6.5 hours. The number of patients discharged on the same day greatly improved from 29% (n=27) in the initial study to 58% (n=21). This decreased unnecessary inpatient stays from 71% (n=66) to 42% (n=15). Conclusion This study showed that an orthopaedic doctor in the ED for the acute assessment of patients referred with possible CES is an effective way of improving their management. This decreases waiting times for MRI scans and therefore allows the patient to be managed more efficiently.

Comparing Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia to Rectus Sheath Catheter Analgesia for Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

Controlling postoperative pain is essential for the greatest recovery following major abdominal surgery. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has traditionally been considered the preferred method of providing pain relief after major abdominal surgeries. Thoracic epidural analgesia has a wide range of complications, including residual motor blockade, hypotension, urine retention with the need for urinary catheterisation, tethering to infusion pumps, and occasional failure rates. In recent years, rectus sheath catheter (RSC) analgesia has been gaining popularity. The purpose of this review is to compare the effectiveness of TEA and RSC in reducing pain following major abdominal surgeries. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score were included according to the set criteria. A total of 351 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were included in this meta-analysis. There were 176 patients in the TEA group and 175 patients in the RSC group. In the random effect model analysis, there was no significant difference in VAS pain score in 24 hours at rest (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.46; 95% CI -1.21 to 0.29; z=1.20, P=0.23) and movement (SMD -0.64; 95% CI -1.69 to -0.14; z=1.19, P=0.23) between TEA and RSC. Similarly, there was no significant difference in pain score after 48 hours at rest (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.36 to 0.08; z=1.29, P=0.20) or movement (SMD -0.69; 95% CI -2.03 to 0.64; z=1.02, P=0.31). In conclusion, our findings show that there was no significant difference in pain score between TEA and RSC following major abdominal surgery, and we suggest that both approaches can be used effectively according to the choice and expertise available.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international reconstructive collaborations in Africa.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has catalysed a widespread humanitarian crisis in many low- and middle-income countries around the world, with many African nations significantly impacted. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the planning and provision of international reconstructive collaborations in Africa. Methods: An anonymous, 14-question, multiple choice questionnaire was sent to 27 non-governmental organisations who regularly perform reconstructive surgery in Africa. The survey was open to responses for four weeks, closing on the 7th of March 2021. A single reminder was sent out at 2 weeks. The survey covered four key domains: (1) NGO demographics; (2) the impact of COVID-19 on patient follow-up; (3) barriers to the safe provision of international surgical collaborations during COVID-19; (4) the impact of COVID-19 on NGO funding. Results: A total of ten reconstructive NGOs completed the survey (response rate, 37%). Ethiopia (n = 5) and Tanzania (n = 4) were the countries where most collaborations took place. Plastic, reconstructive and burns surgery was the most common sub-speciality (n = 7). For NGOs that did not have a year-round presence in country (n = 8), only one NGO was able to perform reconstructive surgery in Africa during the pandemic. The most common barrier identified was travel restrictions (within country, n = 8 or country entry-exit, n = 7). Pre-pandemic, 1547 to ≥ 1800 patients received reconstructive surgery on international surgical collaborations. After the outbreak, 70% of NGOs surveyed had treated no patients, with approximately 1405 to ≥ 1640 patients left untreated over the last year. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed huge pressures on health services and their delivery across the globe. This theme has extended into international surgical collaborations leading to increased unmet surgical needs in low- and middle-income countries.Level of evidence: Not gradable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00238-021-01892-4.