Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 40(6): 102276, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447185

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence supports the use of ampicillin-sulbactam as a favored choice for antibiotic prophylaxis following head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery. However, there is a paucity of evidence guiding the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to compare the infection rates of short courses of ampicillin-sulbactam versus extended courses of various antibiotics in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted from 2012 to 2017 at a tertiary academic center on 266 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. The primary outcome measure was the rate of any infection within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: There were 149 patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis for an extended duration of at least seven days. 117 patients received a short course of antibiotics defined as 24 h for non-radiated patients and 72 h for radiated patients. Postoperative infections occurred in 45.9% of patients, of which 92.6% occurred at surgical sites. There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative infection rate between patients receiving an extended duration of antibiotics versus a short duration (p = 0.80). This held true for subgroups of surgical site infections (p = 0.38) and distant infections (p = 0.59 for pneumonia and p = 0.76 for UTI). Risk factors for infections were identified as hypothyroidism (p = 0.047) and clean contaminated wound classification (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Shorter duration of ampicillin-sulbactam prophylaxis in free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects does not negatively affect postoperative infection rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Protocolos Clínicos , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
J Cell Biochem ; 117(4): 959-69, 2016 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26375403

RESUMO

C-Mpl is the receptor for thrombopoietin (TPO), the main megakaryocyte (MK) growth factor, and c-Mpl is believed to be expressed on cells of the hematopoietic lineage. As MKs have been shown to enhance bone formation, it may be expected that mice in which c-Mpl was globally knocked out (c-Mpl(-/-) mice) would have decreased bone mass because they have fewer MKs. Instead, c-Mpl(-/-) mice have a higher bone mass than WT controls. Using c-Mpl(-/-) mice we investigated the basis for this discrepancy and discovered that c-Mpl is expressed on both osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs), an unexpected finding that prompted us to examine further how c-Mpl regulates bone. Static and dynamic bone histomorphometry parameters suggest that c-Mpl deficiency results in a net gain in bone volume with increases in OBs and OCs. In vitro, a higher percentage of c-Mpl(-/-) OBs were in active phases of the cell cycle, leading to an increased number of OBs. No difference in OB differentiation was observed in vitro as examined by real-time PCR and functional assays. In co-culture systems, which allow for the interaction between OBs and OC progenitors, c-Mpl(-/-) OBs enhanced osteoclastogenesis. Two of the major signaling pathways by which OBs regulate osteoclastogenesis, MCSF/OPG/RANKL and EphrinB2-EphB2/B4, were unaffected in c-Mpl(-/-) OBs. These data provide new findings for the role of MKs and c-Mpl expression in bone and may provide insight into the homeostatic regulation of bone mass as well as bone loss diseases such as osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteogênese/genética , Receptores de Trombopoetina/genética , Trombopoetina/genética , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Densidade Óssea , Contagem de Células , Diferenciação Celular , Divisão Celular , Efrina-B2/genética , Efrina-B2/metabolismo , Homeostase/genética , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Macrófagos/genética , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Macrófagos/metabolismo , Megacariócitos/citologia , Megacariócitos/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Knockout , Osteoblastos/citologia , Osteoclastos/citologia , Osteoprotegerina/genética , Osteoprotegerina/metabolismo , Ligante RANK/genética , Ligante RANK/metabolismo , Receptor EphB2/genética , Receptor EphB2/metabolismo , Receptor EphB4/genética , Receptor EphB4/metabolismo , Receptores de Trombopoetina/deficiência , Transdução de Sinais , Crânio/citologia , Crânio/metabolismo , Trombopoetina/metabolismo
3.
Semin Thromb Hemost ; 37(6): 682-9, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22102271

RESUMO

The GATA family of transcription factors, including the founding member, GATA-1, have an important role in gene regulation. GATA-1 is integral to successful hematopoiesis. A wide variety of mutations in GATA-1 affect its function, as well as its interaction with its cofactors (especially Friend of GATA) and the genes upon which GATA-1 acts. Here we review the known mutations, focusing on the specific alterations within the amino acid sequence, the resulting effect on hematopoietic development, and the clinical manifestations that result. Attention is also paid to the relationship between Trisomy 21, also known as Down syndrome, and the phenomenon of a truncated GATA-1, named GATA-1s. The evidence for specific interaction between GATA-1 and chromosome 21, which may explain the correlation between these two mutations, is briefly reviewed.


Assuntos
Fator de Transcrição GATA1/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Mutação , Trombocitopenia/genética , Substituição de Aminoácidos , Animais , Síndrome de Down/genética , Humanos , Trombopoese/genética
4.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 160(5): 829-838, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30857478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) includes time medically necessary in the hospital and time waiting for discharge (DC) afterward. This DC delay is determined in head and neck free flap patients. Reasons for and factors leading to DC delay, as well as associated adverse outcomes, are elucidated. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for all head and neck free flap surgeries from 2012 to 2017. Data including demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors were collected. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with DC delay. RESULTS: In total, 264 patients were included. Mean total LOS was 13.1 days. DC delay occurred in 65% of patients with a mean of 4.8 days. Factors associated with DC delay on univariate analysis included Medicaid/self-pay insurance, DC to a facility, and not having children ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed prolonged medically necessary LOS and surgery on a Monday/Friday ( P < .05) were associated with DC delay. Top reasons for DC delay included case management shortages, rejection by facility, and awaiting supplies. Eleven percent experienced complications during the DC delay. DISCUSSION: DC delay can add days and complications to the LOS. Prevention begins preoperatively with DC planning involving the patient's closest family. Understanding limitations of the patient's insurance may help plan DC destination. Optimizing hospital resources when available should be a focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Head and neck free flap patients require a team of teams unified in optimizing quality of care. DC delay is a novel quality metric reflecting the team's overall performance. Through strategic DC planning and capitalizing on available resources, DC delay can be minimized.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação , Alta do Paciente , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Laryngoscope ; 128(2): 336-342, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28498522

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Head and neck free flap patients require complex postoperative care. The quality of care for these patients often depends on their management from the time they leave the operating room. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a postoperative inpatient coordinator (IC) for head and free flap patients on quality outcomes: length of stay (LOS), 30-day unplanned return to the emergency department (30dRED), 30-day unplanned readmissions (30dUR), and complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent head and neck free flap surgery between January 2012 and January 2016 were reviewed using a prospective database. Patients had an IC for their entire hospitalization (group 1) or for less than their entire hospitalization (group 2). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for quality outcomes. RESULTS: Mean LOS was 13.8 days and 17.3 days in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .002). The 30dRED rate was 12% and 22%, respectively (P = .04). Group 2 had an increased LOS by 4.1 days (P = .001) and a 2.4 fold increased 30dRED (P = .03). 30dUR and complications were not influenced by the IC (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: An IC may help decrease LOS and 30dRED in head and neck free flap patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:336-342, 2018.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA