Electromyography of pelvic floor muscles with true differential versus faux differential electrode configuration.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In pelvic floor muscle (PFM) electromyography (EMG) two different bipolar configurations are applied: "true differential" configuration (TD) measures neuromuscular activity with two ipsilateral electrodes, whereas "faux differential" configuration (FD) has two electrodes placed on each side of the PFMs. The aim of the study was to determine possible differences and the relationship between both configurations. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of 28 continent (CON) and 22 stress urinary incontinent (SUI) women was performed. Surface EMG was measured using a vaginal probe during maximal voluntary (MVC) and fast voluntary (FVC) contractions. TD and FD were explored with amplitude- and time-related EMG parameters, cross-correlation coefficients (R(0)) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). RESULTS: Of a total of 62 comparisons of EMG parameters of MVC and FVC, only one comparison showed significant differences between the two configurations (CON group, FVC4peak TD versus FD, p = 0.015). R(0) were high in both groups for all MVC and FVC variables (R(0) ≥ 0.989). SPM detected 3 out of 28 comparisons with short (0.124-0.404 s) significant supra-threshold clusters (p < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that TD and FD might measure neuromuscular activity almost the same. Very high cross-correlation coefficients and a very limited number of significant results from EMG parameters, as well as SPM, suggest that in the measured sample the choice of TD or FD might remain practically irrelevant. To gain further insight into the scientific and clinical relevance of choosing either of the electrode configurations, the comparisons should be re-evaluated on a sample with more severe incontinence symptoms.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of worksite health promotion programs in Europe: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the evidence regarding economic evaluations of worksite health promotion programs in Europe. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the literature search, study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by two researchers. Full economic evaluations of worksite health promotion programs carried out in a European workplace were included. RESULTS: From 1728 search results, 39 articles describing 37 studies were included. Regarding methodological quality, 9 studies were rated as strong, 15 as moderate and 15 as weak. Six of the studies fulfilled the minimum standard for health economic evaluations. Worksite health promotion was applied in many different forms for a wide range of settings. Cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit and cost-utility analyses were performed from different perspectives. Effects on health outcomes tended to be small and uncertain. Only 9 out of 21 cost-benefit analyses reported a financial benefit and 10 out of 23 cost-effectiveness analyses concluded that the intervention was cost-effective. Two out of eight cost-utility analyses were found to be cost-effective. Productivity loss accounted for more than 85% of the total costs and thus, was the main cost driver in the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Due to considerable heterogeneity, no specific type of intervention could be identified to be particularly effective and the economic value of worksite health promotion remains uncertain. Further studies, investigating comprehensive worksite health promotion programs are needed to provide evidence on their efficiency. Guidelines to perform economic evaluations in the field of worksite health promotion, especially for valuation of productivity loss, are required.