Evaluation of the Geographical Accessibility of Genome-Matched Clinical Trials on a National Experience.

BACKGROUND: Molecular-driven oncology allows oncologists to identify treatments that match a cancer's genomic profile. Clinical trials are promoted as an effective modality to deliver a molecularly matched treatment. We explore the role of geographical accessibility in Italy, and its impact on patient access to clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed molecular data from a single-institutional case series of patients receiving next-generation sequencing testing between March 2019 and July 2020. Actionable alterations were defined as the ones with at least one matched treatment on Clinicaltrials.gov at the time of genomic report signature. We then calculated the hypothetical distance to travel to reach the nearest assigned clinical trial. RESULTS: We identified 159 patients eligible for analysis. One hundred and one could be potentially assigned to a clinical trial in Italy, and the median distance that patients needed to travel to reach the closest location with a suitable clinical trial was 76 km (interquartile range = 127.46 km). Geographical distribution of clinical trials in Italy found to be heterogeneous, with Milan and Naples being the areas with a higher concentration. We then found that the probability of having a clinical trial close to a patient's hometown increased over time, according to registered studies between 2015 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The median distance to be travelled to the nearest trial was generally acceptable for patients, and trials availability is increasing. Nevertheless, many areas are still lacking trials, so efforts are required to increase and homogenize the possibilities to be enrolled in clinical trials for Italian patients with cancer.

Molecular tumour board at European Institute of Oncology: Report of the first three year activity of an Italian precision oncology experience.

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcomes by personalising treatment options for patients with cancer. Exploiting vulnerabilities identified in a patient's cancer genome requires reliable interpretation of a huge mole of alterations and heterogeneous biomarkers. ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) allows evidence-based evaluation of genomic findings. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) convey the required multi-disciplinary expertise to enable ESCAT evaluation and strategical treatment choice. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 251 consecutive patients discussed by European Institute of Oncology MTB between June 2019 and June 2022. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty-eight (74.6%) patients had at least one actionable alteration. After MTB discussion, 76 patients received molecularly matched therapies (MMTs) while 76 patients received standard of care. Patients receiving MMT displayed higher overall response rate (37.3% versus 12.9%), median progression-free survival (mPFS 5.8 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-7.5 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.5-4.8, p = 0.041; hazard ratio 0.679, 95% CI 0.467-0.987) and median overall survival (mOS 35.1 months, 95% CI not evaluable versus 8.5 months, 95% CI 3.8-13.2; hazard ratio 0.431, 95% CI 0.250-0.744, p = 0.002). Superiority in OS and PFS persisted in multivariable models. Among 61 pretreated patients receiving MMT, 37.5% of patients had PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥1.3. Patients with higher actionable targets (ESCAT tier I) had better OS (p = 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.049), while no difference was observed in lower evidence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that MTBs can yield valuable clinical benefit. Higher actionability ESCAT level appears to be associated with better outcomes for patients receiving MMT.

Evaluation of a Hybrid Capture-Based Pan-Cancer Panel for Analysis of Treatment Stratifying Oncogenic Aberrations and Processes.

Stratification of patients for targeted and immune-based therapies requires extensive genomic profiling that enables sensitive detection of clinically relevant variants and interrogation of biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Detection of single and multiple nucleotide variants, copy number variants, MSI, and TMB was evaluated using a commercially available next-generation sequencing panel containing 523 cancer-related genes (1.94 megabases). Analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and cytologic material from 45 tumor samples showed that all previously known MSI-positive samples (n = 7), amplifications (n = 9), and pathogenic variants (n = 59) could be detected. TMB and MSI scores showed high intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibility (eight samples tested in 11 laboratories). For reliable TMB analysis, 20 ng DNA was shown to be sufficient, even for relatively poor-quality samples. A minimum of 20% neoplastic cells was required to minimize variations in TMB values induced by chromosomal instability or tumor heterogeneity. Subsequent analysis of 58 consecutive lung cancer samples in a diagnostic setting was successful and revealed sufficient somatic mutations to generate mutational signatures in 14 cases. In conclusion, the 523-gene assay can be applied for evaluation of multiple DNA-based biomarkers relevant for treatment selection.

Molecular markers of breast cancer cells identified in fine needle aspiration samples from resected sentinel lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze a procedure for breast cancer that requires performance of a molecular test before extensive intraoperative examination, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of surgically removed sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). STUDY DESIGN: The diagnostic accuracy of extensive histologic examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of 101 SLNs from 98 breast carcinoma patients were compared with that of the evaluation of 2 specific mRNA markers by reverse transcriptase polymerase change reaction (mammaglobin and MUC-1). Cell specimens were obtained by FNAC of the SLNs immediately before freezing. RESULTS: Metastases were detected on frozen sections in 19 cases (18.81%). IHC on serial sections confirmed the metastases and showed micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in 24 SLNs (23.76%). Mammaglobin was expressed in 20 FNAC specimens (19.80%). MUC-1 assay was positive in 11 cases only (10.89%). CONCLUSION: This technique allows a complete histologic examination without sacrifice of part of the SLN and at the same time is a valuable diagnostic adjunct to the detection of occult tumor cells. Moreover, it is less expensive and time consuming than extensive IHC.

Immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: report from an international experts panel meeting of the Italian association of thoracic oncology.

INTRODUCTION: The potential long term survival gain, related to immune adaptability and memory, the potential activity across multiple tumour types through targeting the immune system, and the opportunity for combinations offered by the unique mechanism of actions and safety profile of these new agents, all support the role of immunotherapy in the cancer treatment pathway or paradigm. Areas covered: The authors discuss the recent advances in the understanding of immunology and antitumor immune responses that have led to the development of new immunotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoint pathways, such as Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Currently, two PD-1 inhibitors are available in clinical practice for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Expert opinion: Ongoing research will dictate future strategies, including the potential incorporation of immunotherapy in stage dependent treatment settings (early stage locally advanced disease and first line therapy for metastatic disease). Immunotherapy combinations are promising avenues, and careful selection of patients, doses of each agent and information supporting strategies (i.e. concomitant or sequential) is still needed.