Evaluation of a Rapid, Fully Automated Platform for Detection of BRAF and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma.

BRAF and NRAS genetic analyses are time-consuming and can delay treatment choices in patients with metastatic melanomas presenting with acute deterioration. We compared the rapid, real-time, fully automated molecular diagnosis platform Idylla™ with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry for detection of BRAF and NRAS mutations in 36 patients with metastatic melanomas. The Idylla™ NRAS-BRAF-EGFRS492R mutation assay (110 min per sample) detected BRAF and NRAS mutations in 15 and 17 samples, respectively. One NRAS mutation was different between NGS and Idylla™ (NRASG13C vs. NRASG12A/D). Four samples were BRAF and NRAS wild-type. The global concordance between NGS and Idylla™ assays was 97.2% (35/36 cases). Immunohistochemistry was positive only in 9/9 BRAFV600E- and 6/6 NRASQ61R-mutated samples with VE1 and SP174 antibodies, respectively. The Idylla™ platform is a valuable rapid molecular diagnosis tool to reduce the delay in BRAF and NRAS analyses-related treatment choices for patients with metastatic melanoma presenting with acute deterioration.

Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational status and microsatellite instability in early colorectal carcinomas invading the submucosa (pT1): towards an in-house molecular prognostication for pathologists?

AIM: We aimed to study the prognostic value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF mutations and microsatellite stable (MSS)/instable (MSI) in the field of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa (ie, pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC)). METHODS: We led a case-control study in tumour samples from 60 patients with pT1 CRC with (20 cases) and without (40 cases) metastatic evolution (5 years of follow-up) which were analysed for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF mutations (Idylla testing and next generation sequencing, NGS) and MSS/MSI status (Idylla testing and expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins using immunohistochemistry). RESULTS: KRAS mutations were encountered in 11/20 (55%) cases and 21/40 (52.5%) controls (OR=1.11 (0.38 to 3.25), p=0.8548), NRAS mutations in 1/20 (5%) cases and 3/40 (7.5%) controls (OR=3.08 (0.62 to 15.39), p=0.1698) and BRAF mutations in 3/20 (15%) cases and 6/40 (15%) controls (OR=1.00 (0.22 to 4.5), p=1.00). A MSI status was diagnosed in 3/20 (15%) cases and 5/40 (12.5%) controls (OR=1.2353 (0.26 to 5.79), p=0.7885). Beyond the absence of significant association between the metastatic evolution and any of the studied molecular parameters, we observed a very good agreement between methods analysing KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations (Kappa value of 0.849 (0.748 to 0.95) between Idylla and NGS) and MSS/MSI (Idylla)-proficient MMR/deficient MMR (immunohistochemistry) status (Kappa value of 1.00). CONCLUSION: Although being feasible using the fully automated Idylla method as well as NGS, the molecular testing of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and MSS/MSI status does not seem useful for prognostic purpose in the field of pT1 CRC.

Fast and Easy-to-Perform BRAF Testing in Melanoma Samples: An Accessible Tool for Pathologists With no Experience in Molecular Analyses.

BRAFV600 mutation testing is mandatory for treatment choices in patients with advanced melanomas. Besides molecular methods, VE-1 immunohistochemistry has paved the way for BRAF mutation detection by every pathologist, but it only detects BRAFV600E mutant protein, and additional DNA-based molecular analyses are often delegated to molecular genetics laboratories to detect mutations other than BRAFV600E. In this technical article, we present a new diagnostic device that is easy to implement in surgical pathology laboratories, even for pathologists lacking any experience in molecular analyses, to diagnose most of the BRAF mutations encountered in melanoma. The implementation of this fast (<2 h per analysis) and fully automated new real-time polymerase chain reaction diagnostic device, in pathology laboratories, could help to reduce the turnaround times for molecular results, to allow rapid subsequent therapeutic choices in patients with advanced melanomas and other cancers.

Histopathological factors help to predict lymph node metastases more efficiently than extra-nodal recurrences in submucosa invading pT1 colorectal cancer.

The therapeutic management of patients with endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa (i.e. pT1 CRC) depends on the balance between the risk of cancer relapse and the risk of surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to report on the histopathological risk factors predicting lymph node metastases and recurrences in an exhaustive case series comprising every pT1 CRC (of adenocarcinoma subtype only) diagnosed in Finistère (France) during 5-years. For 312 patients with at least 46 months follow-up included in the digestive cancers registry database, histopathological factors required for risk stratification in pT1 CRC were reviewed. Patients were treated by endoscopic resection only (51 cases), surgery only (138 cases), endoscopic resection followed by surgery (102 cases) or transanal resection (21 cases). Lymph node metastases were diagnosed in 19 patients whereas 15 patients had an extra-nodal recurrence (7 local recurrences only, 4 distant metastases only and 4 combining local and distant recurrences). Four patients with distant metastases died of their cancer. Poor tumor differentiation, vascular invasion and high grade tumor budding on HES slides were notably identified as strong risk-factors of lymph node metastases but the prediction of extra-nodal recurrences (local, distant and sometimes fatal) was less obvious, albeit it was more frequent in patients treated by transanal resection than with other treatment strategies. Beyond good performances in predicting lymph node metastases and guiding therapeutic decision in patients with pT1 CRC, our study points that extra-nodal recurrence of cancer is more difficult to predict and requires further investigations.

High reproducibility is attainable in assessing histoprognostic parameters of pT1 colorectal cancer using routine histopathology slides and immunohistochemistry analyses.

Assessment of the risk of lymph node invasion and tumour recurrence is critical to determine whether additional surgery is required in patients with endoscopically-removed pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC). A reproducible assessment of this risk of recurrence based on histopathological parameters is crucial for relevant therapeutic decisions. The inter-observer reproducibility of these parameters was the subject of our study. Two pathologists independently analysed 163 endoscopically-removed pT1 CRC recorded in a local digestive cancer registry database (Finistère, France). Using haematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) and immunohistochemistry slides, they evaluated several parameters related to the risk of tumour recurrence according to the international pT1 CRC-dedicated guidelines. Based on Kappa and intra-class correlation coefficients, good to very good inter-observer agreement was obtained by analysing vertical and lateral margins, submucosal invasion, tumour differentiation and lymphovascular invasion. The reproducibility of tumour budding quantification was only fair on the basis of HES slides but reached a very good agreement using cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Dual colour cytokeratin and podoplanin immunohistochemistry also improved inter-observer agreement for the detection of lymphovascular invasion. All patients with loco-regional nodal metastases (7 of 101 who underwent complementary surgery) or distant metastases (3 patients) were diagnosed as having a high risk of recurrence and requiring an additional surgery by the two observers. Our study showed that good to very good inter-observer agreement is achievable in evaluating the pathological parameters of recurrence risk in endoscopically-removed pT1 CRC. In addition to HES slides, the detection of lymphovascular invasion and tumour budding can benefit with more reproducible immunohistochemical analyses.

Evaluation of a fast and fully automated platform to diagnose EGFR and KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded non-small cell lung cancer samples in less than one day.

AIMS: Searching for EGFR and KRAS mutations within non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) samples remains time-consuming and can delay treatment choices in patients with acute deterioration. We evaluated the performances of the fully automated Idylla platform to quickly detect these mutations in NSCLC samples. METHODS: We used the Idylla EGFR Mutation Assay and the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test to analyse 18 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumour samples with known EGFR and KRAS mutation status according to next-generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for EGFRT790M mutations. RESULTS: Idylla assays identified KRAS and EGFR activating mutations in 4 and 10 NSCLC samples, respectively. EGFRT790M resistance mutations were identified in only 1 sample using Idylla but in 4 and 14 samples using NGS and ddPCR, respectively. No false-positive result was noted with Idylla assays. Mutation written report was obtained after 130 min (KRAS assays) to 140 min (EGFR assays). CONCLUSIONS: The Idylla platform is an interesting ancillary first-line fast and fully automated tool to detect EGFR and KRAS mutations in NSCLC samples allowing rapid treatment choices in patients with acute deterioration.