RESUMO
Prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) is a commonly used treatment to decrease heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with traumatic hip injuries. We conducted a retrospective review of patients at risk for HO who underwent XRT. Of the patients reviewed, 27.3% developed radiographic HO, 11.2% developed symptoms, and 2.0% required resection surgery. Patients were divided into primary (n = 71) and secondary prophylaxis (n = 27) cohorts. In the primary group, 25.0% developed radiographic HO, 5.6% developed symptoms, and 0 required surgery. In the secondary cohort, 33.3% of patients developed new radiographic HO, and 25.9% were symptomatic: four had a Brooker score of 3, and three had a score of 4 (p = 0.03), and 7.4% required surgical resection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):113-118, 2022).
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossificação Heterotópica , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Attempts to control costs associated with total joint arthroplasty have included efforts to shorten hospital length of stay (LOS). Concerns related to patient outcomes and safety with decreased LOS persist. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 after joint replacement is associated with increased rates of 90-day return to the operating room, and 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: After chart review, 447 patients admitted between January 2, 2013 and September 16, 2016 met inclusion criteria. All patients underwent one total joint arthroplasty. Patients were either discharged on POD 1 (subgroup 1) or POD 2 or 3 (subgroup 2). Statistical evaluation was performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, and Fisher exact tests for categorical and frequency data. Statistical significance was established at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Subgroup 1 had significantly fewer return trips to the operating room (P = .043) and significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (P = .033). ED visits were not significantly different between groups (P = .901). CONCLUSION: Early discharge after joint arthroplasty appears to be a viable practice and did not result in increased rates of reoperation within the 90-day global period, or rates of 30-day readmission and ED visits. Our results support the utilization of an early discharge protocol on POD 1, with no evidence that shorter LOS results in higher rates of short-term complications.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Período Pós-Operatório , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , VeteranosRESUMO
Introduction: Septic arthritis is an orthopaedic emergency, with permanent cartilage damage possible within hours of the onset of symptoms. Diagnostic criteria for septic arthritis in immunocompetent patients are well established, however, there is a paucity of literature evaluating diagnostic criteria in immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this retrospective case-control study was to evaluate the laboratory and clinical information of immunocompromised patients with septic arthritis and compare them to immunocompetent patients with septic arthritis to enable physicians to diagnose septic arthritis more accurately in this population. Methods: All patients at our institution, a level I trauma center, with a clinical diagnosis of septic arthritis between January 1, 2006 and November 1, 2021 were identified and reviewed retrospectively. Patients 18 years old or older were screened for immunocompromised status and those meeting criteria were included for review. The control cohort was matched by the joint affected and age. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, Turkey's test, Mann-Whitney U test, independent sample t-test, and chi-square analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 36 patients with positive joint aspirate cultures were compared (18 immunocompetent and 18 immunocompromised). The immunocompromised group had a significantly longer length of hospital stay than the immunocompetent group (p = 0.044). There was no significant difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = 0.852), peripheral white blood cell count (pWBC) (p = 0.696), joint aspirate white blood cell count (aWBC) (p = 0.901), polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%) (p = 0.325), or total operations performed per patient (p = 0.365). Conclusion: At our institution, immunocompromised patients with septic arthritis did not have significantly different diagnostic laboratory values when compared to immunocompetent patients. This suggests that immunocompromised patients with suspicion of septic arthritis can be assessed with similar diagnostic criteria as immunocompetent individuals; however, a larger cohort study is needed to assess the difference more precisely in laboratory values.
RESUMO
Background: Traumatic ankle injuries are commonly complicated by persistent symptoms and the development of chronic ankle instability. Purpose: To describe the epidemiology of ankle injuries in the National Football League (NFL) and investigate the effects that ankle injuries have on performance metrics in the years after injury. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiologic study. Methods: Ankle injuries sustained by NFL players during the 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 seasons were identified using the Pro Football Reference database. Cumulative incidence was calculated, and demographic identifiers were collected for each injury. The return-to-play (RTP) rate was also recorded. For each player who met inclusion for the performance analysis, power rating (PR) was calculated for the preinjury season (Y-1) and 2 postinjury seasons (Y+1 and Y+2) as follows: PR = (offensive yards/10) + (total touchdowns × 6) + (combined tackles) + (sacks × 2) + (interceptions × 2). Mean PRs were calculated for each season as well as the percentage change and mean difference in PR between Y-1 and Y+1 (ΔPR1%, ΔPR1) and between Y-1 and Y+2 (ΔPR2%, ΔPR2). Subgroup analyses of PR were performed by player position, injury type, and years of experience. Results: Overall, 668 ankle injuries were identified, with an average cumulative incidence across the 3 seasons of 11.2% and RTP rate of 91%. Of those injuries, 159 met inclusion criteria for the PR analysis. The mean overall PR (96.95 in Y-1) declined 22% in Y+1 to 76.10 (-20.85 [95% CI, -13.82 to -27.89]; P < .001) and 27% in Y+2 to 70.93 (-26.02 [95% CI, -18.04 to -34.00]; P < .001). The mean PR per game played (6.70 in Y-1) decreased 14% in Y+1 to 5.75 (-0.95 [95% CI, -0.56 to -1.34]; P < .001) and 17% in Y+2 to 5.54 (-1.16 [95% CI, -0.63 to -1.62]; P < .001). Conclusion: It was found that ankle injuries hampered the performance of NFL players, even multiple years after the injury occurred, despite a relatively high RTP rate. There was a decrease in total games played after ankle injuries as well as a decreased performance output per game played.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15-year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. Ninety-eight percentage of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS: The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT and 11.1% required surgery to resect the heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow-up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Articulação do Cotovelo , Ossificação Heterotópica , Cotovelo , Articulação do Cotovelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Cotovelo/cirurgia , Humanos , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/prevenção & controle , Ossificação Heterotópica/radioterapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Management of odontoid fractures has improved and evolved due to advancing diagnostic guidelines and understanding of long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to quantify the most frequently cited publications pertaining to odontoid fractures and determine their validity as a tool to practice evidence-based medicine. METHODS: A Clarivate Analytics Web of Science search was used to identify all articles related to odontoid fractures. The 50 most cited articles were reviewed. Criteria included the frequency of citation, year of publication, countries of origin, journal, levels of evidence (LOE), article types, and supporting authors and institutions. RESULTS: The top 3 most cited papers were "Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique" (Madawi 1997), "Atlantoaxial fixation using, plate and screw method: A report of 160 treated patients" (Goel 2002), and "The anatomical suitability of the C1-2 complex for transarticular screw fixation" (Paramore 1996). Spine (n = 13; 26%) was the most common journal, and the most frequent decade was 2000-2009 (n = 18; 36%). The United States was associated with the greatest number of publications, and the most common article type was clinical outcomes (n = 16; 32%). The most recurring LOE was IV (n = 20; 40%). CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the historical literature pertaining to odontoid fracture management. There is a paucity of high LOE publications regarding this topic, and clinicians should strive to provide more high-level studies. This article can help practitioners navigate the vast body of literature about this topic and identify high-impact publications.