Sclerosing Pneumocytoma: A Ten-Year Experience at a Western Balkan University Hospital.

Background and objective: Sclerosing pneumocytoma is a rare, benign tumor of the lung that represents a diagnostic challenge due to the diversity of pathohistological findings. The aim of this study was to present a 10-year experience with sclerosing pneumocytoma of a large center for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary diseases, and to emphasize differential diagnostic dilemmas as a potential source of errors. Material and Methods: This represents a retrospective study of six patients diagnosed and treated with sclerosing pneumocytoma in the 10-year period. The study analyzed various parameters, which are: Sex, age, symptoms, size and localization of the tumor, and its gross and histological features. Results: Sclerosing pneumocytoma was more frequently diagnosed in females (83.34%). The patients ranged in age from 38 to 61. Most of the patients (66.66%) were asymptomatic. Two patients underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, two patients had a video-assisted minithoracotomy, and two patients underwent a thoracotomy in order to remove the tumor. The tumor was localized in the left lower lobe, in the right upper lobe, and in the right lower lobe in 50%, 33.34%, and 16.66% of patients, respectively. The tumor size ranged from 1 to 2.5 cm. A pathohistological examination of all six cases reported that all four major histological patterns were found in tissue sections: solid, papillary, sclerosing, and hemorrhagic. In all six cases, an immunohistochemical analysis showed positive expression of TTF-1 and panCK in surface epithelial cells, and TTF-1 positivity and panCK negativity in round stromal cells. Conclusions: Sclerosing pneumocytoma is a strictly histological diagnosis supported by clinical and radiological findings and corresponding immunohistochemical methods. Lung pathologists should always keep this tumor in mind, since its spectrum of differential diagnosis is wide, and therefore it can be an important diagnostic pitfall.

HER2-low metastases of HER2-negative primary tumors: a single institution analysis of intertumoral and internodal heterogeneity in node-positive breast cancer.

Objective: HER2 status in breast cancer is an essential parameter in individual therapeutic decision-making and is routinely assessed in primary tumors in accordance with international recommendations. Reports of HER2 heterogeneity raise the question of basing treatment decisions on HER2 status in metastases, if present. We investigated the degree and clinical implications of HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node-positive breast cancer. Because of recent recognition of therapeutic opportunities in this group of tumors, we especially focused on cases involving low-level HER2 expression. Methods: The HER2 status of primary tumors and of corresponding lymph node metastases was determined in archived material at the protein and gene levels using the gene- protein assay and interpreted in accordance with 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria. HER2-low status was defined as protein expression levels 1+ or 2+ with negative amplification status. Results: We analyzed a series of 43 cases of primary infiltrating breast cancer, each with at least two axillary nodes harboring macrometastases (>2 mm), in total 206 such nodes. In 7% of cases, we detected intertumoral HER2 heterogeneity. Three of nine HER2-positive primary tumors were associated with HER2-negative metastases. No cases with HER2-negative primary tumors had HER2-positive metastases, but 55% (6/11) of HER2 0 primary tumors had HER2 1+ and/or 2+ metastases, and 19% (3/16) HER2 1+ cases had exclusively HER2 0 metastases. All metastases in HER2 2+ cases showed HER2-low protein expression levels. Internodal HER2 heterogeneity at low protein expression levels (presence of HER2 0, HER2 1+, and/or HER2 2+ metastatic deposits within the same axilla) was seen in 40% (17/43) of cases. We found no statistically significant association between HER2 heterogeneity and other tumor-related parameters. Survival data indicated worse outcomes in the HER2-low group compared with the rest of the cohort. Conclusion: Our results indicate a substantial instability of HER2 protein expression, leading to considerable intertumoral and internodal HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node-positive breast carcinomas. This heterogeneity is particularly relevant in HER2-low tumors in which the corrective effects of HER2 gene copy number analysis definitionally is absent. Our findings suggest that determining HER2 status in metastatic lymph nodes may generate relevant information for therapeutic decision-making.

Internodal HER2 heterogeneity of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

Determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is important for adequate treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients. The novel HER2 gene protein assay (GPA) is particularly convenient, as it allows the simultaneous assessment of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification at individual cell level. Here we investigated the frequency of internodal HER2 heterogeneity in axillary lymph node macrometastases of BC patients and compared HER2 status between primary breast tumor and its metastases. We included a total of 41 female patients operated between 2014 and 2015 for primary BC with axillary lymph node macrometastases. Representative paraffin blocks of metastatic lymph nodes were sectioned and the slides were stained using the GPA in 38 BC cases. GPA results were assessed according to the ASCO/CAP 2013 criteria. We analyzed 12586 individual tumor cells, 120 cells per section of each metastatic lymph node. HER2 status differed between the primary tumor and its metastases in 5/38 cases (13.2%). In patients with at least two metastatic nodes, the HER2 status of lymph node metastases was only slightly different in 4/23 cases (17.4%). Our results indicate rare but substantial differences in HER2 status between primary breast tumor and its axillary lymph node metastases that may direct the choice and outcomes of targeted therapy in BC patients. The impact of the rare and subtle internodal HER2 heterogeneity evidenced in this study remains uncertain. Determining the HER2 status of lymph node metastases in BC seems to be rational, but assessing a limited number of metastatic nodes may be sufficient.