Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 28(3): 640-6, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24050854

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Resection of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) with tumor thrombus invasion into the inferior vena cava (IVC) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study examined the intra- and inter-departmental collaboration among cardiac, liver transplantation, and urologic surgeons and anesthesiologists in caring for these patients. DESIGN: After IRB approval, medical records of patients who underwent resection of RCC tumor thrombus level III and IV, from 1997 to 2010 in this institution, were reviewed. Data were collected and analyzed by one way-ANOVA and chi-square test. SETTING: Major academic institution, tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study based on the medical records of patients who underwent resection of RCC tumor thrombus level III and IV, from 1997 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (82.9%) with level III thrombus and 12 patients (17.1%) with level IV thrombus were analyzed. Sixty-five (92.9%) did not require any extracorporeal circulatory support; 5 (2 with level III and 3 with level IV; 7.1%) required cardiopulmonary bypass. No patients required veno-venous bypass. Compared to patients with level III thrombus extension, patients with level IV had higher estimated blood loss (6978±2968 mL v 1540±206, p<0.001) and hospital stays (18.8±1.6 days v 8.1±0.7, p<0.001). Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was utilized in 77.6% of patients with level III thrombus extension and in 100% of patients with level IV thrombus extension. Intraoperative TEE guidance resulted in a significant surgical plan modification in 3 cases (5.2%). Short-term mortality was low (n = 3, 4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of specialized liver transplantation and cardiac surgical techniques in the resection of RCC with extension into the IVC calls for a close intra-and interdepartmental collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists. The transabdominal approach to suprahepatic segments of the IVC allowed avoidance of extracorporeal circulatory support in most of these patients. Perioperative management of these patients reflected the critical importance of TEE-proficient practitioners experienced in liver transplantation and cardiac anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Trombose/cirurgia , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia , Assistência Perioperatória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Card Surg ; 27(3): 275-80, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22497220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Extubation in the operating room (OR) after cardiac surgery is hampered by safety concerns, psychological reluctance, and uncertain economic benefit. We have studied the factors affecting the feasibility of extubation in the OR after cardiac surgery and its safety. METHODS: The outcomes of 78 patients extubated in the OR after open heart surgery were retrospectively compared to a matched control group of 80 patients with similar demographics, co-morbidities, and operative procedures, that were performed over the same time period, but extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) following a standard weaning protocol. Variables collected included the incidence of subsequent unplanned tracheal reintubation in the ICU, postoperative complications, need for mediastinal re-exploration, surgical and OR times, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: Out of a total of 372 cardiac procedures performed during the designated time frame, 78 (21%) resulted in extubation in the OR, mostly after off-pump coronary revascularization (41%) and aortic valve replacement (19.4%). Preoperative hypertension, EF ≥30%, off-bypass revascularization and shorter surgical times increased the likelihood of extubation in the OR. Extubation in the OR did not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality rates, but decreased the length of ICU and hospital stays. The incidence of unanticipated subsequent tracheal intubation in the ICU was comparable to noncardiac high-risk procedures (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Extubation in the OR can be safely performed in a select group of cardiac surgery patients without any increase in postoperative morbidity or mortality. The proposed mathematical model performed reasonably well in predicting a successful extubation in the OR.


Assuntos
Extubação/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 25(2): 233-7, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20709569

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become established as a sensitive and accurate diagnostic method for the rapid assessment of myocardial function. It was theorized that dexmedetomidine (Precedex; Hospira, Inc, Lake Forest, IL) might prove to be useful for sedating patients while undergoing TEE. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial was designed comparing dexmedetomidine versus standard therapy (eg, midazolam and opioids) for sedation. SETTING: This trial was performed in a tertiary care, single-institution university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Males and females, American Society of Anesthesiologists I to IV, ages 18 to 65 years, requiring diagnostic TEE. Patients were excluded if pregnant, if they had taken benzodiazepines or opioids within 24 hours, or if they were deemed to be too unstable to receive any kind of sedation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to standard therapy or dexmedetomidine infusion groups. Sedation was assessed at 6 time points. Pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram, heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, and respiratory rate were monitored. Additional variables measured were the amount of each drug given, the time of the TEE procedure, and the time to recovery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A survey about the quality of sedation, the level of comfort, and whether or not they would accept this type of sedation again was administered after recovery from sedation. Demographic data and patient questionnaire responses were reported as means and standard errors or percents and were analyzed with the t test and chi-square test. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Hemodynamics were statistically different between the two groups at several time points. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) were elevated in the standard therapy group, whereas the dexmedetomidine group had a lower BP. Heart rate was elevated significantly in the standard therapy group compared with the dexmedetomidine group. There was no statistical or clinical difference between the groups in terms of oxygenation or respiratory rate. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that dexmedetomidine appears equivalent in achieving adequate levels of sedation without increasing the rate of respiratory depression or decreasing oxygen saturation compared with standard therapy, and it may be better in achieving desired hemodynamic results.


Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/métodos , Dexmedetomidina , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Vigília/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vigília/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Arch Surg ; 139(5): 552-63, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15136357

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: Safety differences exist among colloids widely used for fluid management in acutely ill patients, as judged according to the comparative incidence of adverse events. DATA SOURCES: Colloid safety data for human subjects were sought, without language or time period restrictions, by means of computer searches of bibliographic and clinical trial databases, hand searches of medical journals and Index Medicus, inquiries with investigators and colloid suppliers, and examination of reference lists. Search terms included "colloids", "morbidity", and "mortality". STUDY SELECTION: Controlled trials, cohort studies, pharmacovigilance studies, and prior meta-analyses were independently selected by 2 unblinded investigators. Of 189 candidate studies, 113 were included, with safety data encompassing 1.54 x 10(6) patients and 1.09 x 10(8) colloid infusions. DATA EXTRACTION: Two unblinded investigators independently extracted data. Study limitations and confounding factors were tabulated. DATA SYNTHESIS: With albumin as the reference colloid, the incidence rate ratio for anaphylactoid reactions was 4.51 (95% confidence interval, 2.06-9.89) after hydroxyethyl starch administration, 2.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-4.45) after dextran, and 12.4 (95% confidence interval, 6.40-24.0) after gelatin. Pruritus occurrence was significantly increased by hydroxyethyl starch exposure (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.58). Artificial colloid administration was consistently associated with coagulopathy and clinical bleeding, most frequently in cardiac surgery patients receiving hydroxyethyl starch. On the basis of large-scale pharmacovigilance study results, albumin infusion resulted in a low rate of both total adverse events (3.1 to 8.6 per 10(5) infusions) and serious adverse events (1.29 per 10(6) infusions). CONCLUSIONS: Significant safety differences exist among colloids. Therefore, conclusions regarding the clinical usefulness of colloids as a fluid class should be formed with caution.


Assuntos
Coloides/uso terapêutico , Hidratação , Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Dextranos/administração & dosagem , Dextranos/efeitos adversos , Dextranos/uso terapêutico , Gelatina/administração & dosagem , Gelatina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/administração & dosagem , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/uso terapêutico , Razão de Chances , Substitutos do Plasma/administração & dosagem , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Prurido/induzido quimicamente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA